Not_Giving_Up
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 09:08 AM
Original message |
Is this for real? (Tom DeLay-CNN) |
|
Tom DeLay's attorney is asking for a new judge because the one he's appearing before now contributed to MoveOn, and he's a dem.
|
BigMcLargehuge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 09:10 AM
Response to Original message |
|
just saw the same thing on MSNBC.
Unfuckingreal...
|
Not_Giving_Up
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. I know, I'm just trying to believe it |
|
Saw it on CNN. The reporter on the scene on CNN just told the anchor that he's shocked that a judge would contribute to such a site. They keep pointing out that they are selling t-shirts with the mug shot.
|
GOPisEvil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
I refuse to put cable news on my TV.
|
PDittie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
GOPisEvil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
I just wish he could have ordered Hot Tub Tom remanded without bond.
|
atomic-fly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 09:10 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Do we have that right? I don't think so. |
Not_Giving_Up
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 09:10 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Even better - the "anchor" |
|
Referred to it as "MoveOn.com"....last time I checked, it was dot org.
|
Loonman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 09:16 AM
Response to Original message |
7. A Dem lawyer is still a lawyer |
|
Backbiter. Snake. You know...
|
Not_Giving_Up
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-21-05 09:19 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Dick Degeurin makes me want to puke |
|
I hope that if they give him a repuke judge, the prosecutor asks for another judge because of bias.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 11:53 AM
Response to Original message |