billyskank
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 01:26 PM
Original message |
|
Wasn't Fitzgerald appointed by Ashcroft? And didn't he recuse himself?
Ashcroft did the right thing. :wtf: :shrug:
And for the mainstream media: who needs you! We can have a perfectly good scandal without your help!!! :bounce:
|
billyskank
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Doesn't anybody else think this is wierd? |
|
Or am I wrong about the Ashcroft thing?
|
KitchenWitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
billyskank
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. I guess Ashcroft just makes a shit neo-con |
|
He's got batshit insane fundamentalist whacko down pat, but he just can't get the satan-spawned neocon thing right. :hi:
|
miss_american_pie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. There was a third party in there |
|
Between Ashcroft and Fitz. Name starts with a C, but I'm blanking on it.
I can't quite picture a world where Ashcroft does the right thing.
|
billyskank
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Doesn't sound right, does it? |
|
It was a real "what's wrong with this picture?" thing. :wtf:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 11th 2024, 02:07 AM
Response to Original message |