Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should the movie The 40 Year Old Virgin be on anyone's top ten?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:06 PM
Original message
Should the movie The 40 Year Old Virgin be on anyone's top ten?
This was the worst piece of crapola movie I've seen
in a long time. Take out the fucks and the sex references
and you have almost nothing. And this is why I don't
listen to Roeper's movie recommendations. So many
films and he names this one as one in his top 10?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seemunkee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. It was fun
but very forgettable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sorry, I liked it
Much better that the usual comedy movie fare
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Me too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. I've yet to see it.
But in terms of empty sex jokes, nothing compares to "Family Guy"...

Maybe there is a reason. But I probably doubt there is one.

It is odd since both of them gave "Serenity" two thumbs up. So there's a sign of hope...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. I thought it was funny. Not brilliantly or unforgettably funny,
but I enjoyed it. I will concede, however, that I'm easily amused and often enjoy sophomoric humor, as long as Adam Sandler isn't involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ghostsofgiants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Top 10? Definitely not.
But I quite enjoyed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, of course if you take out the sex references
it'd be almost nothing. It's a movie about sex. You expected Capra?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
23. I didn't expect it to be on Ebert or Roeper's top ten...that's all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. I agree
It wasn't totally awful, but I don't think it was "Top Ten" material at all. I really wanted to like it, since I loved the show Freaks and Geeks and its producer (I think) was the guy behind that show, in addition to it featuring one of the main characters from that show. But it just wasn't all that good IMHO. Like you said, not a whole lot beyond sex jokes. In terms of raunchy comedies, Wedding Crashers beat it hands down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
huskerlaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Top 10 what?
Top 10 Movies of All Time? Of 2005? New on DVD?

Personally, I thought it was way funny. And what's wrong with sex jokes? That's the genre of movie it is. Seriously, look at the title. Were you expecting an in-depth discussion of quantum physics?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #8
22. Roeper's Top Ten Movies of 2005
Virgin was his 10th.
The amazing absence was "Good Night and Good Luck"
in both their lists. Hello?

http://tvplex.go.com/buenavista/ebertandroeper/today.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. i thought it was pretty funny
not exactly one of the top 10 movies of the year, but funny ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-02-06 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
10. I thought it was pretty damn funny, actually. Funnier than I expected.
but I certainly wouldn't have put it on my "Top Ten List".

Whatever. But hey, to each, their own.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. Seeing as how offensive comedies are a dying genre...
It was great to have flicks like Wedding Crashers and 40 Year Old Virgin this year!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
13. I adored this movie
It was a great movie first because Steve Carell absolutely rocked in this movie and came off quite believable as a 40-year old virgin. Sure there were a ton of "fucks" and sex references (hell, it's about a virgin) but it was something I could relate to more as a 40-year gal (ok, not a virgin) trying to find love & sex out there in today's world.

I haven't done so yet, but I'm probably going to buy a copy of this DVD for my own. The best scene was when he had his chest wax. What's amazing about that scene - they were actually waxing his chest which really is that furry.

It's a great movie and I was upset that Carell didn't get a best actor nod in the Musical/Comedy category for the Golden Globes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #13
30. people can certainly disagree...
I just found it very offensive and wouldn't
want my teenage daughters watching it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. If I had a teenaged daughter (and I admit that I don't)...
I wouldn't mind her seeing this movie. In my opinion, it really does present the message that it's just fine and even desirable to "save yourself" for "the One". (And this, by the way, is from someone who saved himself for "the One".) I'm sorry that you found the medium to be a little rough in regards to language, etc., but that's really the message the movie presents. At least, that's how I perceived it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. the "message" amidst the garbage.
The message of saving yourself for the "one" is
a personal decision and admirable if that is your
personal morality. I still don't think
that message while viewing the garbage was worth it
and it doesn't rate one of the top ten films of
2005 in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
14. I'll like it better when I see it on TCM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
15. Hell no
It wasn't even all that funny. At least to me.

Richard Roeper is a fucking joke as a film critic, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
16. I liked it but
I don't see how it should end up on a Top 10 list by the critics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
17. Sorry, but I couldn't disagree more.
There is a LOT more to it than "fucks and sex references". Sorry that you don't see it, but it's most definitely there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. Roeper cites the love story...which did hold it together.
but come on...it certainly wasn't worth wading
through the much to find that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XNASA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
18. Watched the 'Widescreen Unrated' version about a week ago.
I was doubled over during the chest waxing scene, mostly because of the expressions and comments of the actors in the background.

But overall, it was marginally better than 'Attack of the Killer Tomatoes'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bikebloke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
19. American Pie with adults
That's how it came across to me. Mildly entertaining, but not one of the year's best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
20. Not in my opinion.
It was okay funny, but I was hoping for funnier so I was a little disappointed. It is worth watching though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
21. I find obtuse, poorly filmed indie crap more enjoyable
Just kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. Nicely done.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Like comparing apples and eggplants....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. I see that went over your head too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Except that he wasn't making a comparison at all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #21
38. Obtuse, poorly filmed indie crap is ALWAYS better...
particularly when it's less than 85 minutes long, and when it involves a cast of probably 50 actors that you have never heard of (and never will again) playing characters involved in at least 20 confusingly cross-cut subplots.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
25. and where was "Good Night and Good Luck" on either list?
They both said there were so many good movies of
2005 that there should be another list 11-20.

Yeah and Virgin made it to Roeper's 10th place.
Gads, someone from that film must have sent
him a large fruit basket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coventina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
32. I thought it was the funniest movie I'd seen in a long time.
I don't know about "top 10" material, but for a silly comedy, it was perfect.

Granted, I watched it sick in bed with the flu and running a fever, so maybe if I'd been in my "right mind" I would have had a different reaction.
But I thought for what it was, it was brilliant.
I especially loved the closing sequence from "Hair".

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
33. I'm sure I could think of 10 movies I liked better overall
But it was certainly the funniest comedy I saw all year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughLefty1 Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
34. Come on it was funny....
I enjoyed it! It's def not an Oscar fare but did find myself laughing out loud several times. That's all I expected from this flick.

The boyfriend and I rented several movies this weekend and this was the only one where we didn't feel as though we were watching a video game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
35. this is a fun thread
but I have to recuse myself since I have not seen any movies made in 2005. I'm a 43 year old movie virgin. This movie is on my "to see" list though, since it is about me. Has everyone else gone to more than 10 movies this year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-03-06 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
36. I was in a bad mood when I saw it and didn't find it all that funny.
Edited on Tue Jan-03-06 12:45 PM by peekaloo
I think Steve Carell is hilarious.
I think the second season of 'The Office' was way better than season 1.

I just didn't get into this movie as I expected I would.

Top Ten? No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC