|
Edited on Thu Jan-12-06 10:45 PM by necso
I think that yours is a reasonable interpretation, but I also think that the literal interpretation is correct. Because if one keeps one's displays of formal "religiosity" confined to private places, then one's adherence to his religion can only be judged by the public (that is, in public) based on one's other acts (than these formal acts).
So if you want to be publicly seen as a good Christian, then you must act as a good Christian in public, but in ways other than praying, etc.
I can also read an admonition against self-righteousness and showiness here.
And I'd go so far as to see a reference to acting anonymously when performing Christian acts. For one must consider the cultural baseline when examining a document (or whatever), because there can be a part of the necessary context that the writer leaves out -- leaves out because it is a commonplace and the baseline -- and he is not spelling out the baseline, but rather what is different or new or distinct.
...
In the old days people had little or nothing. And if they were going to entertain themselves (and each other) and thus ease the burden of life, then largely they had to turn to each other.
And one of the things that they did was use language to entertain themselves. Poems, allegory, stories, imagery, jokes, speech (text) that can be understood in different ways (in particular depending on how much the "viewer" understood of some greater thing or "message"), all these sorts of things and more provided entertainment for people.
Besides, the more time that you spend thinking about something (in the context of the greater message or not) the closer that you bring it to you... and, perhaps, the better you understand it.
But it's important to remember the larger message and the larger example when considering any piece of the NT -- and one must not rule out the possibility that something that seems contradictory to the overall message is intended to shock a little bit (as in "being out of character") and to get one to look for how this bit can be interpreted in a manner consistent with the larger.
...
Let me clarify.
I don't think that this passage says never, ever pray in public, but rather pray (perform formal religious acts) when alone or with others who are doing the same -- and this generally where there is no other public -- and never for the purposes of display.
Moreover, where this takes one -- expect to be primarily judged by acts other than formal religious ones (by man, by God) -- is the key point that the literal interpretation takes one to.
|