BlueStater
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-14-06 11:21 PM
Original message |
Ever notice how we've never had a president born in the 1930s? |
|
It's the first decade since the 1810s to be skipped over.
And, no. I don't have a point.
|
aclog
(521 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-14-06 11:23 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Well it'd be kinda late now |
|
since any 30s candidate would be at a minimum close to 70 by 08
|
texanwitch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-14-06 11:23 PM
Response to Original message |
2. That's a very interesting fact, I never thought of that. |
undeterred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-14-06 11:27 PM
Response to Original message |
3. There was no procreation allowed in the 30s |
|
because the economy was so bad. I can't think of anyone born in the 30's, can you?
|
aclog
(521 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-14-06 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Right but I know people who survived the 30s |
|
and obviously they would've suicided if no procreation was allowed...
|
undeterred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-15-06 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Sex was allowed, just no procreation |
|
The opposite of the republican view, which is procreation, but no sex...
|
fishwax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-15-06 12:25 AM
Response to Original message |
6. we've never even had a presidential candidate born in the 30s |
|
have we? Or even anybody ho came close to getting a nomination? Jerry Brown was born in the 30s, I think, but he didn't really get close ...
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-15-06 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
Edited on Sun Jan-15-06 12:56 AM by JVS
|
name not needed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-15-06 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-15-06 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. Thanks captain obvious. Read the post before mine |
name not needed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-15-06 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. The trains are electric! You cannot fool me! |
fishwax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-15-06 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
12. oops! forgot about him |
|
but, then, he was pretty forgettable ;) I still wish he'd won, though, and not just to get the 30s covered ...
|
BlueStater
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-15-06 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
14. Gary Hart was born in 1936 and almost took the nomination away... |
DS1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-15-06 01:00 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Yes, you do have a point |
|
You just don't know it, yet
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-15-06 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. Tell us what it is! Thinking is hard! |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 11:39 AM
Response to Original message |