Is "nt" necessary or good or useful or anything like that?

[uppityperson]

[leftstreet]

1. not sure n/t

[alarcojon]

2. I've seen people rag on both sides

Those who use it and those who don't. So I'm diggin' this poll!

[SofaKingLiberal]

3. No, It's f**king worthless. n/t

:P

[uppityperson]

6. .

:rofl: nt?

[hiaasenrocks]

4. I think so.

I get tired of clicking on posts only to find no message, just the poster's sig. Not a huge deal, but, just my opinion...

[jobycom]

5. Keeps people from clicking on posts with no text. Should be mandatory. nt.

[Dr Fate]

7. Right- perfect for one liners. n/t

n/t

[lakemonster11]

8. It's better than "eom," which I always pronounce mentally.

:eyes:

Not a big fan of either, I guess.

[tyedyeto]

9. For those of us living in the Dark Ages (have dial-up)

It's very useful. On threads that have 150 or more posts, I will open the thread, not by clicking on view all, but by clicking on the title. If there's 'no text', it's nice to know so you're not opening up individual messages that are empty except for the title.