Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ladies:Your reaction to the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:42 PM
Original message
Poll question: Ladies:Your reaction to the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nicole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. What swimsuit issue?
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
2.  - is to post this photo:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. I really couldn't care less
It does me no harm and I'd much rather focus on sexism in the workplace than a magazine full of well paid women in bathing suits if we're discussing problematic treatment of women in our society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flaxbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. well said, LeftyMom.
Men like to look at women, women like to look at men (though I think the visual aspect isnt' as strong for/important to women). No biggie. These models are well paid and know what they're doing.

Now, discrimination in the workplace, sex tourism involving children, other forms of domination and exploitation, etc. - that's something to be angry about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divameow77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I agree
It's a magazine for guys, the models are being paid well, and hey, if you got it flaunt it.
There are much bigger sexism issues to worry about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laheina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. You don't think that those two things are connected? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Primarily by capitalism
Corporations sell photos of airbrushed women standing on midwinter beaches in skimpy swimsuits because people will buy them. They pay women less because they can, certainly they don't go out of thier way to pay men what they're worth, either.

I'm just saying focusing on minor shit doesn't win the major battles and it marginalizes feminism as being about stifling sexuality instead of beign about equal rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laheina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. Stifling sexuality,
I've never heard it put that way before. Owning our own sexuality, without social stigma, might be a better way.

I've never allied myself with feminism, but a really good book on this topic is Naomi Wolfe's "The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty Are Used Against Women."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think it's gross, and I think it is a symptom of a larger problem.
I do agree with LeftyMom that hey, let's work on discrimination in the workplace, etc. But.

I think this issue is a symptom of the larger problem, and as such, it bothers me. Am I going to start a website advocating boycotting SI? Of course not. But I think it's interesting that in this day and age we still allow women to be treated like objects. Everyone likes sexy, but I don't know, I really think it goes beyond the pale with women. If a respected mainstream woman's magazine has an entire issue devoted to men's bare buttocks, then we can talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. See, that's why I can't complain
If there were a magazine devoted to men with nice shoulders (my current odd body part obsession) wearing no shirts, I'd buy a lifetime subscription. There isn't (that I know of, who knows with niche marketed stuff these days) but knowing that about myself I can't complain about men who want to look at breasts.

A certain amount of healthy attention to sexuality isn't harmful, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Well sure, but your health magazine (or sports magazine or cooking mag)
Edited on Wed Feb-15-06 09:48 PM by tjdee
wouldn't devote an entire issue to mens' shoulders. That's what so irritating, about this particular issue, to me. If a guy wants to order a nudie mag, cool. But the fact that this issue is in a legit sports magazine ...the fact that I hear about this issue on CNN as if they're talking about a new soda coming out...
when really what it comes down to is that straight men like breasts and will pay to see them any way they can. It's like bam, here are some more breasts and ass for all of you to look at, again, like you see in every movie, magazine, etc. And, by the way, this is what beautiful woman look like, in case all you women were wondering. This size, this color hair, etc.

I don't think there is a comparable "sexy man" anything. If there were, I may feel differently.

I dunno, I'm not being clear, and I'm all over the place. I think I need some pie. :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Don't get me wrong,
I think it's tacky as hell and marketed to men who are too chickenshit to just go buy a skin mag like they really want to. I think it's a damn shame how it's full of airbrushed, made up, boob jobbed women who don't look like any woman a guy will ever actually meet.

It's a shame really, if they wanted to focus on sex appeal but in a realistic and healthy way, why not just do shots of female athletes? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I'm sorry you feel so strongly about this
I apologize if you're offended, I didn't intend this thread to be serious

:spank: self
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Oh no, I'm not offended
I just tend to phrase things really strongly. I'm told I can be a bit overbearing at times.

My apologies for the misunderstanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
30.  Yes, now that I'd be okay with.
I mean, how far removed from sports can you get, Heidi Klum for goodness sake, LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #16
41. Hear, hear
Looking at the height/weight stats of many of the athletes competing at the olympics made me feel better about myself.

5'6" and 140? Works for me! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 03:26 AM
Response to Reply #14
42. What kind?
I am partial to pecan myself. I am an older chap who is getting to be as much interested in food as in sex. Actually when I was younger and stoned I think food actually obsessed me more. And, yes, I have to dust off the exercise bicycle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Hmmm, two points here
When you say 'allow women to be treated like objects',you portray the women in SI as essentially passive and lacking a say in the matter. I disagree with that, they are exercising their choice to appear in SI (and are getting paid good money for it , besides)

The other issue might just have to do with guys being more visual than women.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Objectified women get paid the most!
Now, prostitutes with pimps don't get paid the most, LOL. But if you are a woman with "good" body parts, and you capitalize on those body parts, you get paid much more than if you have a good BRAIN.

How messed up is that?

There are various ins and outs of it, to be sure, and there are plenty of good looking men who have careers just because they're attractive.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laheina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. And this fact makes it harder for women with brains
to be taken seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
24. Women are treated like objects..
... no more than men are - albeit men as objects with a different purpose.

People like looking at attractive people. Trying to make is a big political/social issue is absurd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rbnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well...
...I actually think the women are beautiful and I like looking at them. But I understand surrounding issues, and would like to see more types.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HarukaTheTrophyWife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm a lesbian and I don't mind admitting that I do find it kind of sexy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynzM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. I think it's awful cookie-cutter....
But I agree, it's their choice, they're paid well... I just wish they weren't all size 4-8, curvy, white (or close to, in appearance) women. But that's what sells. I dunno. On one hand, I feel like it perpetuates an unreal stereotype that makes most women feel worse about themselves, and on the other hand, I don't feel like it's that big a deal. As with many things, it probably depends when you ask me :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. I never really understood WHY such things make
women feel worse about themselves. I mean, I don't look at WWE wrestlers or Brad Pitt and feel bad about it (and neither do most of the guys I know)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laheina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. That's a little like comparing apples to oranges.
It has to do with women's traditional role in society, as well as old stereotypes and attitudes that refuse to die. These lead to women making less in the work place, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynzM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. I'm going to go with socialization on this one...
I think women are socialized to compete more physically in terms of appearance, and men in terms of 'prowess' or 'skill' or 'strength' or whatever you want to call it... hence the fact that more women feel bad and compare themselves to supermodels (or whomever) and more men play competitive, often violent sports. JMHO, of course :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
33. Because women are constantly being fed the idea that beauty = worth.
In every magazine, commercial, television show...women and girls are bombarded with the message that their value is in their looks. That beautiful women get the advantages. That less attractive women have less value. On top of that, even the beautiful women pitched to us as the ideals we should strive for aren't even good enough: hence all the airbrushing and artificial retouching of photos. If THOSE women aren't good enough the way they are, what hope does the average woman have?

Popular culture in this society doesn't promote the idea that our worth is in who we are but rather what we look like. It's so deeply ingrained into so many of us that we can't disentangle ourselves from the idea emotionally even when we want to intellectually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. It's not just in magazines...
I've been thin (anorexic) and I've been fat (obese) and I had more workplace respect when I weighed less than 100 pounds than I did at 250.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
31. I can guarantee...
those models aren't size 4-8.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Definitely not.
I'm a 6 and they make me look really fat by comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynzM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Well, ok, whatever size they *are*
:) I don't mean that to sound bitchy! Just that they all look SO much the same, yk? Is there really only one look that men find sexy? (obvious 'no', just sayin') I guess they are playing to a particular crowd, and that's what does it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friesianrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. Most of the girls are gorgeous...
Except for a few who just don't do it for me (yes, I am a straight girl). Doesn't bother me at all - they're adults, and I can appreciate beautiful women the same as beautiful men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cfield Donating Member (648 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. It's hot!!!
And, I wish I looked like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellen Forradalom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
37. Christy Brinkley in 1981 was very hot
And I wish I looked like that :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
19. Harmless entertainment...Doesn't bother me in the least. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
21. What I don't like about it and didn't understand as a child
Is that Sports Illustrated is a sports magazine. Although they focus mostly on men's professional sports, women are also athletes and there are some sports stories involving women's sports. By having an issue devoted to women in bikini's but not to women's sports, they seem to be saying that the women in bikini's are more important than female athletes. Some men already see female athletes primarily in terms of their bodies. Having an issue devoted to female bodies seems to help reinforce this train of thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. The swimsuit issue is separate and optional
I don't think they claim it's a 'sports magazine'(the swimsuit edition, that is), they just use the name 'Sports Illustrated'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-15-06 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
25. Ah Yes, Nothing Better Than Sanctimony
The usual commments, "SI is objectifying women". "Women are not as visual as men". "No magazines for women." Blah, blah, blah.

First, there are plenty of mags that show half naked men and fully naked men. Go to the Men's Fitness section or Playgirl.

Second, women are every bit as visual as men are. EVERY BIT. A guy that looks like George Clooney or Brad Pitt has a much, much easier time with women than a guy who looks like Emo Phillips.

As for SI, heck, today there's sooo much soft core and hard core porn around, that a swimsuit issue doesn't really even get men going.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 05:58 AM
Response to Reply #25
49. You nailed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
39. "Pornography for Cowards"
I'm a grown man, and can buy the real thing
Why in the hell would I buy that?
And yes, I do realize the irony of using "the real thing" in reference to pornography.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlienGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
40. "If I'd been born beautiful I could afford health care and maybe even...
...buy a house someday, or make enough money to retire when I'm old."

Tucker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 04:06 AM
Response to Reply #40
46. but you were born beautiful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
43. It is sexual fascism!
As a man who is jumping unwisely in here and a hetero too, it just occurred to me that there are a lot of gays and lesbians in sports and why can't they have a special issue too? Inquiring minds want to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
44. I am tired of the MAN keeping us DOWN!
filthy mysoginistic sexist men looking at those awful pictures of those horrid scantily clad freakishly beautiful half naked gorgeous impossibly thin and buxom nubile soaking wet supermodels

BAD! BAD!

:spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank:
:patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
45. I think the girls are beautiful
I don't look like that in or out of a swimsuit, I don't have to. It's not my job but it is theirs so they had better look good (they are supposed to be eye candy). The way I look at it is; my job is to love people for who they are not how they look. In the scheme of things it's no big deal. I'm pretty sure that those who buy the mag aren't going to be asking to have one more look at the nekkid girls before their last breath, I'm sure they'll be asking to see the real loves in their lives. Men are visual, stuff like that gives them a happy heart or at least a happy something even if momentarily.

:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
47. I work at a magazine stand
And I'm already tired of the morally uppity types turning the covers over in an effort to hide the boobies.

I really got into it with some lady today. It's gonna be a rough next few weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lakemonster11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-16-06 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
48. I don't mind that it exists,
but I hate the fact that it's considered an issue of Sports Illustrated. I mean, pictures of models in swimsuits have nothing to do with sports. If guys want a pin-up magazine, they should just go buy one. If Sports Illustrated is going to have a swimsuit issue (which makes no sense to begin with :eyes:), they should have photos that cater to both genders.

I feel the same way about cheerleaders/dance teams at sporting events. What do half-naked women jiggling, gyrating, and bouncing around have to do with football or basketball? If guys want to see that, they should go to a strip club (or just watch MTV). If they're going to have women dancing around in skimpy clothes, they should have male cheerleaders, too. And those cheerleaders should be equally chosen for how hot they look in their underwear and should be wearing equally-revealing clothing.

Now this is the point in my argument where my brother always looks disgusted and says that that would never happen because men wouldn't like that. Well, guess what? Maybe women don't like the way things are now. I like basketball and football a lot, but I don't enjoy going to the games like I do with baseball, and it has everything to do with the anti-woman atmosphere the teams promote by having sexist entertainments at the games. I just don't feel welcome.

I don't have a problem with pin-up magazines or dancing girls, I just think that they should be separate from sports, which are community events during which both sexes should feel comfortable.

(end of rant...as a female sports fan, this is just something I feel strongly about)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC