Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The $124.46 million lump sum or 30 years of $6.5 million installments?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 05:06 PM
Original message
Poll question: The $124.46 million lump sum or 30 years of $6.5 million installments?
February 19,2006 | LINCOLN, Neb. -- Someone, somewhere held the only winning ticket for the record $365 million Powerball jackpot, but likely wasn't in a rush to come forward, Nebraska lottery officials said Sunday.

The winning numbers drawn Saturday were 15, 17, 43, 44 and 48, with a Powerball number of 29, according to the Multi-State Lottery Association of Des Moines, Iowa, which runs the game for the participating states.

The ticket holder has the option of taking the money in one lump sum or installments over 30 years. The cash option is $177.8 million, or $124.46 million after taxes. On the installment plan, the first payment would be $6,507,986 after taxes.

The previous U.S. lottery jackpot record was $363 million for the Big Game, the forerunner of Mega Millions. That was won by two ticket holders in Illinois and Michigan in 2000. Powerball's previous record jackpot, $340 million, was won by an Oregon family in October.

http://www.salon.com/wire/ap/archive.html?wire=D8FSCAKG7.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SmileyBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. I would snatch that $125 million in a heartbeat.
I could've done a lot of good things with that money...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Our lottery makes you choose when you BUY the ticket
Only a fool would take the lump sum.. Who couldn't live very nicely on 6.5 mil guaranteed every year:)..taxes or no taxes :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maveric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. But if you die its not transferrable. It stops!
Take the lump sum because you never know what may happen. You'd be able to set your family up better with the lump sum, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. In CA, it IS inheritable ..(It's part of your estate)
but then I will never win more than 5$ so I won;t worry too much:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Bad idea
The lottery is set like an annuity. You take the lump sum and invest it normally and you would have a better rate of return than the gov't annuity would give you. Check your present value tables.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I have heard so many horror stories about people who win big
Edited on Sun Feb-19-06 06:36 PM by SoCalDem
take the lump sum, blow it and a few years later they are bankrupt.

By taking the annuity, one would have plenty of "walking around" cash, a nice place to live, a couple of spiffy cars and guaranteed security for their heirs, after a few years of payments, and the rest could surely be invested..

Experts always advise using OPM anyway, and there's not a bank in the world that would turn down a loan to someone with a 30 yr guaranteed 6.5 million income after taxes..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. I believe I read that it makes more financial sense to take the lump sum
and invest it. I'd do the math and talk to a few people (since there's no great hurry) before deciding.

Either one is more money that I've every dreamed of having or even really wanted. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philosophie_en_rose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'd take the lump sum.
It would be easier to invest the lump sum, instead of waiting for a payment from the state every year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm probably not going to live for another 30 years...
so I'd take the money and buy an island somewhere-- populated by beautiful women whose only English is "Yes, sir."

Actually, after long talks with accountants, lawyers, and such I'd set up a foundation with most of the money and live off of a small but reasonable income. My needs are fairly modest and I could happily give most of it away.

FWIW, unless they've changed things recently, if you take the annuity and die, taxes on the full amount of the net present value are due immediately out of your estate. You really screwed your heirs if you take the annual payments and die too soon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. $124 mil in a heartbeat and here's what I'd do with it
Buy a pre war condo or whatever they call it in MANHATTAN
invest in a trust so that the money could grow
give some to organizations fighting for national healthcare, universal free college education leading to a bachelor's degree, a basic income guarantee, public transportation and affordable housing.
buy a scooter in at least three colors: purple, blue, and red
I'd have a kickin' and I do mean KICKIN' home theatre system


then I'd go back to school myself and get an undergraduate degree in Jewish studies and not have to justify it to ANYONE because I'd not have to worry about earning a living.

Oh I dream!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yvr girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-19-06 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'd talk to a financial advisor
Most likely opt for the lump sum.

I'm glad we don't have to worry about the taxes in Canada. Lottery winnings aren't taxable here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC