hedgehog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-09-06 09:54 PM
Original message |
| When Election 2008 comes around, can we discuss results |
|
realtime, or will we have to wait 3 hours for the West Coast to catch up?
|
| XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-09-06 09:55 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Go back to FReep, troll! |
| Crazy Guggenheim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-09-06 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
|
| hedgehog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-09-06 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
That was supposed to be a joke!
No need to get insulting!
|
| XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-09-06 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
| hedgehog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-09-06 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
| MissMillie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-09-06 09:56 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Well, it's my understanding |
|
that they don't announce a winner in a particular state until the polls close in that state.
So I would think real-time wouid be just fine.
|
| AmericanErrorist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-09-06 10:11 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. This is actually a serieus problem |
|
In Canada, all media is subject to a election night blackout until the polls close in a timezone that is being reached.
|
| hedgehog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Apr-09-06 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
| 8. There you go, introducing a rational solution |
|
Next I expect you'll be suggesting that we develop a way for a fast, clean repeatable count like Canada's, too, eh?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:47 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
