Lots of wonderful insights into the fundie mind here:
http://www.capalert.com/capreports/"March of the Penguins also includes an instance of animal copulation. There is absolutely nothing lewd about it and no animal privates are seen, but it is still a sexual act that can create thinking in your adolescents."
The Indian in the Cupboard (1995) was a most difficult movie to justify....For example, this movie presented nineteen scenes of exposure of what has been traditionally too much posterior flesh and frontal flesh between the beltline and the thigh. Granted, the American Indians wore outfits similar to the outfit worn by Little Bear in this movie, but if the amount of exposure of his flesh was not a deliberate attempt to show as much skin as the producers thought they could get away with, then why did Little Bear the man not wear as much clothing as Little Bear the figurine?...I made no attempt to account for the contradiction of bringing plastic figures to life with only Jesus having the power to give life or to resurrect.
The Lion King seemed innocent enough, didn't it? But did we really notice all the issues of assault on morality and ethics the first time we watched it? ...To address the many accusations we have received that the film presents many hints of the homosexual nature, only one was incorporated into the scoring distribution: the matter of Timon speaking to dressing in drag. But if attention to the posterior is an indication of an undercurrent of a homosexual nature, there were eleven instances noted of special attention given to the posterior of animals. "
Parents in the RUGRATS movie gambled on the birthweight of an unborn baby. One of the diaper-wearing toddlers tucked a chocolate coin in the crotch of his diaper to save it for his sister. Astrology is indeed an unholy entity and has no righteous place anywhere let alone in a cartoon for kids....To make matters even more questionable, the producers presented cartoon nudity -- a rear view of a toddler without his diaper...a cartoon is not the place for such display.
Just know that Lilo & Stitch is PG and indeed possesses some programming that may be offensive to your acceptance standards. ...In one scene, a woman on the beach is wearing a swimsuit that challenges the limits of acceptability in terms of how much frontal pelvic skin should show. And, of course, the under curvature of gluteous maximi are revealed by brief beach wear, I guess just to convince younger and younger ones each year it is okay to show a little more skin than last year ... and the year before
. There is nothing accidental, unintentional, or "blooper" about what is seen in animation.
*Toy Story 2* would have earned a CAPCon green light if there was but one less issue of violence -- just one less. Whatever. *Toy Story 2* earned a CAPCon Yellow light. A video game killing, a theft (of Woody from a yard sale), a breaking and entering (to rescue Woody), and a threat of physical violence by another story figure topped off the matters of violence and crime in *Toy Story 2*....Sex/Homosexuality lost points only to a gaggle of Barbie(tm) dolls dancing in swimwear as Mr. Potato Head and others ogle at them with a sensual presence. Bo Peep was also her usual alluring self but so ambiguously as to make declaring her behavior an influence very difficult.
Re: Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire--"A word on "magic." Our Director - Child Psychology Support, a practicing clinical psychologist and licensed school counselor has this to say about "magic" in and as entertainment: "Kids who revere Harry can't help to notice their own impotence by comparison, and yearn for the antidote that having "magical powers" would provide." Such dissonance can cause and has caused children to not only have unclean thoughts but to dabble and experiment with dark evil matters.
Peter Pan GREAT SCOTT! Gunfire to kill children! Cannon fire to kill children! Murder by impalement! Murder by gunfire! Attempted murder of children by drowning! Attempted murder of children by sword! Attempted murder by poisoning! Suicide to save! Choking a young girl! Arrow impalement of a child! Horrible threats and endangerment of children! By raw numbers (see CAP Rule of 1000), Peter Pan <2003> was most certainly as violent and invasive as some R-rated movies.
http://www.capalert.com/capreports/
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
