XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 08:48 PM
Original message |
Name three books you hated that everyone else thought were terrific |
|
1. Nickel and Dimed. I thought she sort of created a self-fulfilling prophecy by not staying longer in each place she moved to. Moving is expensive, and of course you're going to be ridiculously short on cash when you move to a new town, much less working minimum wage when you get there. Furthermore, all the people she worked with... how well can you get to know someone in a month? I think it would have been a MUCH more profound book if she had spent 6 months in each place, working each job. Doing it for a month makes her a tourist.
2. Collapse. I thought there were some flaky things in Guns, Germs, and Steel, but I also thought there were some good ideas. Collapse was just BAD. After the chapter on Easter Island I put the book back on the shelf and never finished it. The whole question "What was the islander who chopped down the last tree thinking?" would be much more profound if he didn't state that all the tree seeds found had been chewed by rats, and would be even more profound if palm "wood" was good for anything, which it isn't, because it isn't really wood. He just gets on a tangent and only presents stuff that supports his idea.
3. Cryptonomicon. The main (male) characters were one dimensional, the women were just there so the men could get laid (except for the ex wife and the two old women), there were HUGE numbers of typos, and he used the word "interstitial" 7 times. All that and there were whole 100 page sections that were boring as shit about random, nerdy, Aspie topics like Turing machines. :snore:
So what say ye, DU? :D
|
Jade Fox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 09:01 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Mystic River. I read a glowing review, and it wasn't until I was near the end that I realized the book was never going to get good.
One Hundred Years of Solitude. Maybe it's the title, but I tried three times to get into that book, and failed.
|
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. One hundred years of solitude |
|
Went ON and ON and ON... and the part with him having 17 sons with the same name who all got killed? Like WTF?
|
femmocrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
9. I hated that book! Never finished it. |
|
"Love in the Time of Cholera" was so good, and "100 Years" so disappointing.
|
crim son
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
11. Wow. I absolutely loved that book. |
|
I'm looking at it on my bookshelf right now. Sometimes it's just a mood thing. The mold and tedium which practically sprang from the pages suited me very well at the time I was reading it.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. I did, too. In fact, I loved every word of his work. |
|
He was a POS but he wrote like an angel.
|
crim son
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
for Latin writers, and Russian ones. These people are so deeply human, so passionate, that it overwhelms me. The French, on the other hand... "Les Miserables"? Heaven help me have the patience.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
18. I'm hooked on magical realism. But, you're right. I liked |
|
the Russians, too, and I think that's because I'm a Latina and the culture felt familiar to me.
|
Shakespeare
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
43. Are you talking about Garcia-Marquez??? |
|
Good lord, I have the great fortune to meet the man a few years ago, and found him delightful. He's also a hardcore leftist.
|
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
15. Maybe it's less interesting |
|
if your life is tedious and your bathroom moldy? :shrug:
|
crim son
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
I read it in the middle of summer, friendless, lonely, in a small town in Maine. I related to the humidity and most assuredly the solitude. :hug: I wish you a bit more excitement and a dab of bleach.
|
amitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
14. Five hundred thousand million bazillion years of solitude. |
|
That was MY name for that book (hated it)!!!!
|
yellowdogintexas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 09:09 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Moby Dick, Catcher in the Rye, and anything by Ernest Hemingway |
|
although he gets props for his love of cats
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. Anything by Hemingway, Moby Dick and ? |
|
DaVinci Code? I got exactly two pp in and gave it away.
Hemingway bores the hell out of me. Moby Dick I'd probably like if I wrestled with it.
|
idgiehkt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
10. 3rd vote for Moby Dick |
|
I loved Catcher in the Rye and I was working with Holden Caulfied at the time (a prototype) which totally freaked me out completely.
The Fall of the House of Usher was stupid and needlessly perverted.
I don't know why I veer off toward short stories when I start talking about this stuff, I remember them better than novels.
I've liked everything that I've read by Hemingway and Fitzgerald. Maybe not loved, but liked.
The last book I remember reading that I just outright loathed was one by Dean Kootz I can't remember the name of.
|
Cygnusx2112
(214 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I don't know if "everyone" thought it was terrific, but about 500 pages in, I realized what tripe it was. But I kept plugging on...
Add on to that an ~80 PAGE soliloqy by John Galt and its all I could keep from :wtf:
No more will I pick up 1000 page books by someone I've never read before...
|
ThomCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
20. Atlas Shrugged was predictable, dogmatic |
|
and not even a particularly good story. It was 2 dimensional and preachy, but it didn't bother to see beyond it's own preaching.
I read this book and could not believe that people thought this was profound.
|
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 09:18 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Oh, and Diamond is a really bad writer too... |
|
His writing style is very stilted and awkward, and he has trouble distinguishing between FACTS and OPINION.
|
femmocrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 09:34 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Fri Sep-29-06 09:36 PM by femmocrat
Ulysses Lady Chatterly's Lover
I don't read much fiction.
|
Mz Pip
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
63. Definitely agree on the DaVinci Code |
|
Boring, linear no real surprises. Mrs' Jesus had a baby. BIg wow. :eyes:
Mz Pip :dem:
|
WhollyHeretic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 09:35 PM
Response to Original message |
8. I think I'm going to get into trouble here (at least for one) |
|
Interview with the Vampire -I had about 20 pages left put it down and never picked it back up again. I just didn't care. I'm a voracious reader and I've never gotten that far in a book and not finished it.
Managing and Maintaining a Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Environment -People kept telling me things like "it's a laugh riot" or "thrilling action" But I just don't find it all that exciting. :shrug:
Here's the one that gets people foaming mad at me
1984 -I like dystopian novels but didn't enjoy this one. I didn't like the characters, the writing just didn't grab me.
:hide:
|
crim son
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
12. Everything by Ann Rice AFTER Interview With A Vampire, |
|
all books by Dan Brown, anything at all written by E.M. Forster. Even his biography bores the hell out of me.
|
ThomCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
21. I agree. Ann Rice spiraled downhill, and Dan Brown sucks. |
crim son
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
22. Sweetie, is there anything we don't agree on? |
ThomCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
|
What's your opinion of Tofu? :P
:hug:
|
crim son
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #38 |
41. I like it and eat it regularly. |
|
I guess this spells the end of our friendship, huh?
|
HarukaTheTrophyWife
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #41 |
42. Have no fear. He is a vegan. |
crim son
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #42 |
|
I have found we do disagree. I can't live without roast lamb.
|
HarukaTheTrophyWife
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #58 |
59. He won't lecture you on it. |
|
Edited on Sat Sep-30-06 04:05 PM by haruka3_2000
Thom's even nicer in person than on DU (and he's very nice on DU).
Edited for stupid grammar.
|
Lydia Leftcoast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 10:11 PM
Response to Original message |
19. I hated Cryptonomicon, too |
|
What a boring, disorganized mess.
Everyone assumed that I'd like Snow Falling on Cedars, because of its Japanese-American connection, but I didn't. I'm not sure why.
Let's see, the third. I've read so many bad mysteries, that it's hard to pick just one.
|
Fenris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 10:28 PM
Response to Original message |
23. 1. The Metamorphosis. |
|
Of all the books I have disliked, this is the only one I threw across the room 5 times. What most people find to be an interesting existential parable, I find stupid.
2. The Scarlet Letter. To be fair, I know a lot of people who hate this book. But because it's considered a classic, I have to assume *a lot* of people like it. Tedious, dry, and dull.
3. Song of Solomon. This is the worst book I've ever read, hands down.
|
LostInAnomie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
26. I agree with "The Metamorphosis" |
|
I've never been too impressed with existentialist literature though. I like that philosophy but not the reading material.
2. Candide - I've always just thought it was kinda silly. Voltaire has always seemed to be good for catch phrases and slogans but not really for deep philosophy.
3. Guns, Germs, and Steel - Too simple.
|
WildEyedLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 10:56 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I think if I'd read it when I was 12, I would have loved it. But as it was, I read it in high school, and the constant reaching efforts of my curriculum to make the book a big treatise on race relations just ruined for me what was obviously a book aimed at kids. I just hated the dialect, hated everything about it.
I also hated The Great Gatsby. What a dull, pretentious book. Also overdiscussed and analyzed in my lit class. Hell, maybe if I hadn't read these books in lit class, I wouldn't have hated them... who knows.
|
trackfan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 11:13 PM
Response to Original message |
25. If I hated it, I probably wouldn't finish it - but then it wouldn't be |
|
fair to say I hated it, since I wouldn't have actually read it. What a paradox.
|
Cygnusx2112
(214 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
28. That was my dilema... |
|
I hated Atlas Shrugged about page 500, but couldn't actually say I read it, if I bailed.
I slogged thru the additional 500, 600?, 700? pages and now can say with certainty it sucked. :)
|
gkdmaths
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 11:18 PM
Response to Original message |
27. The first three books of |
|
the bible.
but you knew that was coming.
/gkd
|
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
|
I didn't care much for LOTR.... dull, dull, dull... too uninteresting to inspire hatred. :P
|
gkdmaths
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #30 |
|
thats crossing the line a little, doncha think?
;)
|
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #32 |
|
Furthermore, that would have taken up all three books right there, and would have left no room for Cryptonomicon, which wasn't just boring, but offensive and poorly written/edited as well. Well, more so than Tolkien. :P
|
gkdmaths
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
34. well, it would have all made sense if |
|
Edited on Sat Sep-30-06 01:17 AM by gkdmaths
you'd just read the Silmarillion.
Really.
O8)
on edit: I should add that, when I was in middle and highschool, my friends and I would write the requisite 'notes' in elvish, strictly following Mr. Tolkien's well-documented rules. Of course this was exceedingly juvenile, but hell, we could.
|
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #34 |
35. That's what they said about the Hobbit |
|
Book #4 on my list of top three most boring books ever.
|
gkdmaths
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #35 |
36. Okay, I will give it to you. |
|
but remember, you're talking to a guy who reads The Merck Index and J. Chem. Ed. for fun - W.V. Quine's Mathematical Logic sits next to my toilet for some light reading when necessary.
:o
I heard the most beautiful birdsong yesterday outside the lab and I wanted to tape it so I could ask you what it was. Whatever it was now rivals S.neglecta as my favorite flier.
|
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #36 |
40. Was it fluty, bubbly, whistling, or what? |
|
What's the habitat like? :shrug:
|
gkdmaths
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #40 |
56. it was in a 40 year old rhodie under |
|
an elevated skywalk between two concrete five-story laboratory buildings.
it was really bubly and melodic, long winded but broken into non-repeating parts. I saw a little guy fly out of there, but it was what my kind of birder calls an LBB (little brown bird).
sorry!
|
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #56 |
57. How bout the Winter Wren? |
gkdmaths
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #57 |
|
its a pretty good match by song and visually. I've never paid that much attention to the wren to understand its song. Troglodytes troglodytes just moved up a few spots on my list.
:thumbsup: thanks!
|
gkdmaths
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #57 |
69. And here's your raccoon head |
|
Sorry, its the only one I could find that wouldnt alert the FedEx guy that he might be handling a significant biohazard via the odor. :7
|
WolverineDG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
47. Sticking up for XemaSab |
|
I tried & tried & tried, but I could NEVER get past the first few chapters of the first LOTR books. :boring:
I tried so hard & so often, I've got a "Go Directly to Heaven" card. :P Damn, that book drove me nuts!
dg
|
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #47 |
|
Because I was like "this HAS to get better."
But it didn't. :P
|
Oeditpus Rex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-29-06 11:24 PM
Response to Original message |
29. Only one I can think of is 'The Shipping News' |
|
Horrible, horrible writing.
I actually liked the movie better.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
31. That was a great, freaky movie. Beautiful, too. |
peacefreak
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
37. I agree with you on that. |
|
Tried 3 times to read that sucker. Hated it. Spot on about the movie.
|
annonymous
(850 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 10:16 AM
Response to Original message |
39. I absolutely hated The Hobbit. |
|
I gave up after 100 pages. Other overrated books of mine include The Prince of Tides by Pat Conroy which I found terribly boring, and Wuthering Heights by Charlotte Bronte? I had to read that one in high school and found Heathcliff to be totally creepy.
|
idgiehkt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
48. the Prince of Tides was hard to follow for me |
|
and really unbelievable too.
Wuthering Heights wouldn't have done it for me if now for the arm raking across the glass part, that kind of hooked me in.
|
Calliope
(177 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
49. Obnoxious pedant here |
|
It was Emily Bronte. But I agree with you. I still don't understand why Heathcliff is supposed to be such a romantic figure
|
WolverineDG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #49 |
51. You might like the Thursday Next series |
|
by Jasper Fforde. One of the books (Well of Lost Plots) pretty much rips "Wuthering Heights" to shreds.
dg
|
yvr girl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 01:33 PM
Response to Original message |
44. The Bridges of Madison County |
|
I'd heard so much about it, and couldn't understand the hype after I read it. The author never found an adjective he didn't like. It was so tiresome.
|
kwassa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #44 |
72. I was laughing so hard after the first chapter that I upset someone |
|
who loved the book.
I never made it farther than that.
|
Shell Beau
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 01:34 PM
Response to Original message |
45. Anything by Dan Brown |
Richardo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #45 |
KFC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message |
46. Harry Potter, Harry Potter, and Harry Potter |
|
I read the first one in about an hour. Third grade level crap.
|
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #46 |
Raster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #46 |
80. Have you read any of the others?? |
|
Betcha you'll change your opinion. My favorite so far is the fourth. Dark, very dark.
|
WolverineDG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message |
50. Bell Jar, Catcher in the Rye, LOTR series |
|
The DaVinci Code (dear god, he would always stop the action to go into PAGES of exposition); ironically, I'm one of those weirdos who liked the movie better (except for Tom Hanks' hair.)
Anything by Ann Rice (dear god x 2, I once counted about 25+ pages of some old vampire philosophizing about being a vampire, when all I wanted him to do was STFU & get on with the damn story) :boring:
I know that's more than three but I don't care. :p
dg
|
TimeChaser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message |
54. Let's see... I couldn't stand The Great Gatsby |
|
I don't like the Hobbit, even though I love everything else LotR related. I've read the Silmarillion three times :D
Hm... can't think of a third right now. :shrug:
|
Liberalynn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message |
55. Know it is a Classic but the "Grapes of Wrath" |
|
Edited on Sat Sep-30-06 02:38 PM by Liberalynn
I understood the metaphor between the Okies and the turtle crossing the road, who kept getting knocked over, but three pages of the turtle crossing the road?
I know it's lesson was important, and it was a great issue book, but I have to confess, I thought it was the most boring thing I ever read.
I couldn't even make it through the movie! Confessed to my 11th grade English teacher, that it was a struggle for me to complete the assignment. She was disappointed because she said I was one of most enthusiastic sutdents about the classics, and she was really surprised I hated this one.
Love books and reading and even have loved many of the classics, and other Steinbeck novels like "East of Eden" just not the Grapes of Wrath!
Didn't care for the Red Badge of Courage either by Crane!
|
skygazer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 04:08 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The guy who wrote it knew nothing about horses - the behavior portrayed was ridiculous. It was a love story (or something) set within a horsy milieu. Very bad.
I'll add my vote for Moby Dick - never been able to slog all the way through it.
And I've never thought The Pet Goat was good enough to justify ignoring 9/11.
|
RetroLounge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 04:40 PM
Response to Original message |
61. Infinite Jest - David Foster Wallace |
|
as big a three books, 3 times worse than anything else, totally a slog-fest of pretentious writing and amazinglyly annoyinng and long endnotes.
anyone who says they read the whole thing is lying. or needs to get a life. or just has Infinite amounts of patience.
RL
|
jane_pippin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #61 |
65. Thank you--I hated that monster too. |
|
Edited on Sat Sep-30-06 09:06 PM by jane_pippin
I stuck it out for 400 pages. 4-fucking-hundred pages of masturbatory, go-nowhere, neo post-modern (excuse me a moment, :eyes: ) plotless drivel hiding under some kind of hipster boy-genius cred, or who knows what. I had to stop, and I rarely give up on a book. Generally, even if I don't like a book, I finish it in case the ending or the book as a whole changes my mind. Not this one. It's one of 3 books out of a lifetime of reading I had to just give up on.
Oh, and some guy tried telling me that I "just didn't get it." Yeah. Because I'm an idiot, right? :eyes: I got it pal. I just thought it was utter crap.
|
RetroLounge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #65 |
66. "just didn't get it." |
|
I just love that condescending reply...
I got it, it just sucked ass, and you thinking you got it does NOT make you cool...
:hi:
RL
|
jane_pippin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #66 |
68. Ha ha! Exactly. But you know, he had a point... |
|
Edited on Sat Sep-30-06 09:24 PM by jane_pippin
it's a big book for a little lady to stuff in her tiny brain all by herself.
Speaking of big books, have you checked out The Children's Hospital yet? It's the best thing I've read in years, and I feel like I'm on a mission to get people to read it. I don't even like to say what it's about because half the joy of reading it is letting the story unfold while thinking, "Oh my god, is this what I think this is? Oh man, this is what I think it is!" So, I'll just say it's a beautiful, apocalyptic, epic and I know you'd like it.
edit: girls can't spell. :D
|
RetroLounge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #68 |
71. Not yet, but it just went on my list... |
|
I GOTTA stop giving all my money Schwatrz :rofl:
:D
RL
|
jane_pippin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #71 |
77. I didn't say you had to *buy* it--just read it. |
|
It's at the library. (Though I think there's a short waiting list for it).
Of course, if you want to give your money to your local indie bookstore, far be it from me to stop you. :D
|
InvisibleTouch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 08:51 PM
Response to Original message |
64. Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy |
|
I'm a big sci-fi fan, and an obsessive reader who finishes almost everything she starts, no matter how awful - but this one, I just absolutely could not get through. Tried several times.
And I'll add my vote for anything by Hemmingway. He writes like a third-grader: "See Spot run." How anyone could consider this "classic" material, I'll never understand. But then, I like a more florid and descriptive writing style. And I tell myself that if someone who wrote like Hemmingway could get published, then surely I can too!
|
tinfoilinfor2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 09:15 PM
Response to Original message |
67. My friends were all oohing and ahhing about James Patterson. |
|
I read one of his novels while on a holiday last year. It was pure drivel. Yuk. What a waste of good reading time.
|
pitohui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 09:49 PM
Response to Original message |
70. i guess i'm the official aspie of this thread |
|
Edited on Sat Sep-30-06 10:01 PM by pitohui
didn't read the other two but i loved cryptonomicon, what a terrific story!
and those folks downthread who didn't enjoy infinite jest, what the hell? that's the book you take to the desert island if you are allowed no other books, that is it, that's everything, the story of the 80s, the story of america, the story of addiction -- everything!
and someone couldn't follow the prince of tides? what's that about? a great book but not exactly one of those books you read with a code and a map in your hand -- what's to "follow?"
the only book i can think of offhand that i didn't like that everyone supposedly liked was the pandering piece of shit ender's game
i'm sure there are others but when it comes to books, i find the ones that stay in the mind are the good ones not the bad
aha, thanks to the poster who reminded me of ann rice, a wonderful lady who has done so much for new orleans, but i just can't read her work, i'm glad others like it though and allow her to give to the preservation society etcetera -- she is just not to my taste altho i know her heart is in the right place -- i like her super short stuff (the first beauty book, the interview with a vampire) but i feel books that are primarily porno/sexually charged need to be short for obvious reasons and once she got into the long drawn out stuff it just got to be too much for me
ok, and another shout-out to the person who pointed out james patterson is drivel, that makes it three! he sure is, thank you!
|
iconoclastic cat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-30-06 10:17 PM
Response to Original message |
73. Sister Carrie, Tough Guys Don't Dance, Already Dead, Confederacy of Dunces |
|
Edited on Sat Sep-30-06 10:18 PM by iconoclastic cat
and so many others.
|
mitchum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 12:06 AM
Response to Original message |
75. "Gravity's Rainbow", "The Corrections", "Prozac Nation" |
philosophie_en_rose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 12:15 AM
Response to Original message |
76. The Bible (mainly Old Testament); DaVinci Code; Dune |
|
After reading the OT, I remain completely flabbergasted by freeper censors that are so offended by sex and violence. Gruesome stuff right there.
I read the DaVinci Code at a friend's house while waiting for pancakes. It was okay, but not anything special.
Dune was unbearably dull, dull, and dull. Did I mention dull?
|
boobooday
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 07:38 AM
Response to Original message |
78. Bridges of Madison County |
|
Totally putrid. :puke: Lame, stupid, chauvenist.
Anything by Hemingway.
Hotel New Hampshire by John Irving (I think that was the one) pissed me off at the end and left me feeling betrayed.
|
lettre de cachet
(73 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-01-06 08:35 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I like many of Anne Rice's books, but while I'm reading them I keep thinking, "Please don't describe the trees again." She goes on and on about trees and I have to skip paragraphs.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:10 AM
Response to Original message |