Oooh, the freepers are having their annual evolution brawl!

[mainegreen]

I love it when they do this!

For your reading amusement.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1726431/posts

[Fox Mulder]

1. The world is only 5,000 years old?

What a bunch of stupid fucks!

[ceile]

2. Not as bad as usual.

I only read the first 15-20 or so, but at least there's someone on there familiar with evolution in relation to zoology.

[madinmaryland]

3. What a train wreck!

Ick!!!

[Initech]

4. 5,000 years old? I always thought they said it 6,000 years old.

[mainegreen]

5. That only if your using the King James version.

Or some twisted logic like that.

[Gatchaman]

18. 6,000 is the new 5,000

[Bassic]

6. Oh Jesus H. Christ on a trailer hitch,

how can anyone be that fucking dumb?

I'll say this for creationists: I can't understand how evolution and natural selection still hasen't manage to extinguish Freepers.

At least some of them seem to present a certain degree of intelligence and common sense, which is rare for FR.

[BigMcLargehuge]

15. You an attract many similar comments here...

just post an evolution thread in GD. Before long you'll be referred to as a "materialist" who isn't in synch with the vast mysterious nature of the "immaterial" universe before be asked to prove the big bang theory via quantum mechanics with references to New Agey magazine articles as "proof" that evolution doesn't exist because it doesn't account for souls, essence, or auras.

You probably won't get bums rushed by a mob of toothless Young Earth creationists like most of FR seems to be, but you'll certainly be able to apply to the "how can anyone be that fucking dumb" comment to several, if not dozens, of our own.

[Bassic]

16. I must admit that I've never tried that here,

But if I ever do, I will not hesitate to apply the label to our own if they deserve it.

[Commie Pinko Dirtbag]

7. Get this. Those people work HARD on their stupidity

to the point that iot becomes a form of art:

"Unaltered for 360 million years? Back to the books for evolutionists. Since a lamprey didn't need to evolve this means that humans didn't either. That's what I get out of this."

Suuure. And since birds have wings, that means humans must have them too!

[Bassic]

8. This one must be the dumbest of all

To: SlowBoat407
Ok, I'll warn you now so you can call me names ahead of time - I'm going to post and run, because I can't strand my son at school.

Here's my comment: I've seen in this thread the one common theme I've seen from all evolutionists - no matter what the fossil record shows, it supports evolution.

Think about it. All of these have been proposed on this one thread: 1) If there are changes, that must mean evolution. 2) If there are no changes, that must mean evolution. 3) If this branch didn't change, others must have, so that must mean evolution.

So: None of us were there, and the evidence is approached from a foregone conclusion. My conclusion just happens to be based on God, and whether any will admit it or not, He's better able to do the job than chance.

Flame away, but like I said, I gotta go.



48 posted on 10/26/2006 1:44:40 PM PDT by HeadOn (Pro Deo, Pro Familia, Pro Patria)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies >

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.


-Snip

[LaraMN]

9. "Evolution needs to get its stories straight. Constantly revising is not an answer."

:rofl:
Yeah, because discovery, analysis, and revision aren't TENETS of solid science, or anything...

That person just hates evolutionary theory because he was left out of the process.

[izzybeans]

10. That was my favorite quote as well.

[Bassic]

13. Yeah, and he's pissed off

Cause he has to walk around looking like he's half-crouching while others may stand straight :D

[C_eh_N_eh_D_eh]

17. It's just how these people think.

Changing your mind is a sign of weakness to them. It means you failed to get it right the first time.

[deucemagnet]

11. Thanks for posting!

Sometimes I forget the level of stupidity over there, and they have to prove it to me all over again. Oh, and it's good for a laugh, too. :)

[mainegreen]

12. No prob! nt

[Fuzz]

14. Had to stop, brain hurts. And this goes on nearly every day

over there too.