Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Yaaaghh! Grammar Gripe!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 10:40 AM
Original message
Yaaaghh! Grammar Gripe!
I am a grammar cop--I could bitch all day about the travesties perpetrated upon the English language.

Today's gripe--not grammar exactly, but who the hell came up with the term "test out"? Since when do we test something OUT? And test it out of WHAT? You can "try out" something, but even then, why the extra word? You try something. You test something. WHERE has "test out" come from? :puke:

:rant:

I feel better now. Anybody else got some grammar gripes so I don't feel so all alone in my anal retentiveness? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Lose, loose, loser, looser
Also their, they're and there are so often used incorrectly and it drives me up the wall. Also, the use of apostropes in plural nouns makes me wanna scream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. All good ones
"Loose" for "lose" is one of my major pet peeves. And I can't believe all the house signs that say "The Smith's"--proudly carved/painted/printed/diecast by professionals. Just not professionals with good grammar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Oh, I know. Everytime I see one of those signs
I want to knock on the door and point out the error.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
44. This reminds me of a homemade tattoo that a former neighbor
of mine had prominently displayed on his bicep:

"Born too loose"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. From testing out of a class?
Taking the final at the beginning of the course and passing it so you don't have to take the class and still get the credit?

That's the only time I've ever heard it used -- but I don't get out much. And I've got a whole lot of 'em that make me crazy. Don't get me started...

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. No, that one I can handle
To get out of a class by getting a high mark on a test at least makes SENSE. Nope, lately I've been hearing things like "I just got a new cell phone. I'm gonna test it out." YYeeeaaaagghhh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
58. Idiomatic expressions
phrases that don't literally mean what one would expect.

They are particularly deadly to those of us who learned English as a second language.

In this case, my theory is that "test it out" is a contraction of a phrase borrowed from car sales jargon:

"take it out for a test drive" makes sense. Shorten to "take it out for a test", then "test it out on the road", then simply "test it out".

English is full of such abbreviated expressions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Courtesy Flush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. Too many words!!!
I feel better now. Anybody else got some grammar gripes so I don't feel so all alone in my anal retentiveness?


Juuust kidding
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Poopyhead
:P

Admit it! It's a stupid term. Admit it, or I will taunt you a second time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Courtesy Flush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I concede. Please relent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cwydro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. There
and their and they're. To and too. Oh, I could go on...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. You did good in pointing that out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
10. The out part just means that you get out of doing something.
At my community college, I tested out of having to take any remedial math classes. I do not know who came up with the term, but it got me out of having to take any remedial math classes. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cwydro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. it is just like
"where do you live AT?" That one drives my mom crazy...Also lie and lay. She gets NUTS about hose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I never noticed that one
until I had to teach a basic composition course at a local business school, and there was a whole section in the grammar and usage workbook about not saying "Where you at?"

Then I heard it all the time on "Cops"... (DH's favorite show, alas.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
32. It's these short directional adverbs, people just love 'em.
"Up" is another overused word, as in "listen UP" or "meet UP".

(I'll bet your mom gets really nuts about hose when she gets a run in one of them!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deucemagnet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. I don't even know if this is technically incorrect, but I hate it when..
...the verb to grow is used with certain objects, such as "to grow the economy" or "to grow our business". I have no problem with "to grow tomatoes" or "to grow one's hair", but the previous two are very irksome to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Oh YUCK!
Hate it when somebody waters and fertilizes the economy.

That reminds me of another word shift that makes me shout back at the TV or radio--when meteorologists say "For the overnight..." Overnight is not a noun! Grf!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
novalib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. Nauseous!!!
Whenever I hear someone say, "I'm nauseous", I wonder if s/her realizes how much s/he is putting her/himself down.

"Nauseous" means "causing nausea in someone".

For instance, "The color of the room was nauseous" (Meaning: The color of the room caused me to have nausea.)

When a person has nausea, s/he is "NAUSEATED".

So, it is correct to say, "I'm nauseated" when you feel that you have nausea.

It is correct to say "I'm nauseous" ONLY when you are causing nausea in someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Makes me...er...sick. Yeah, that's the ticket. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
novalib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. It NAUSEATES me!!
It DISGUSTS me (NOT: "It makes me disgusting").

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kay1864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
31. Merriam-Webster disagrees with you....
Main Entry: nau·seous
Pronunciation: 'no-sh&s, 'no-zE-&s
Function: adjective
1 : causing nausea or disgust : NAUSEATING
2 : affected with nausea or disgust
- nau·seous·ly adverb
- nau·seous·ness noun

usage Those who insist that nauseous can properly be used only in sense 1 and that in sense 2 it is an error for nauseated are mistaken. Current evidence shows these facts: nauseous is most frequently used to mean physically affected with nausea, usually after a linking verb such as feel or become; figurative use is quite a bit less frequent. Use of nauseous in sense 1 is much more often figurative than literal, and this use appears to be losing ground to nauseating. Nauseated is used more widely than nauseous in sense 2.

http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/nauseous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Merriam-Webster also disagrees with me in this case...
...much as an unripe apple would. The usage of "nauseous" meaning sick to the stomach is disputed, so we'll have to agree to disagree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kay1864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #33
52. ...
Well, they're much more of an authority than you, so they really don't have to "agree" to anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #52
59. Nor do I.
There are other authorities that prescribe the opposite (I think Fowler's may be one) and I choose to agree with them. What's more, I said the question is in dispute, which is surely correct. And besides, "agree" was your word, so I used it as well; no need to get personal about it.

Finally, I'm Canadian, so I don't automatically consider Merriam-Webster the authority on language -- certainly not on spelling, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kay1864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #59
81. Didn't mean to get personal
I meant to show that it's not a contest of equals, so the concept of "agree to disagree" doesn't really apply between you and them. M-W certainly has far more authority than anyone posting here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #81
87. Oh, I meant you and me, not me and them.
You choose one authority, I choose another. And so the matter is in dispute. That's all that was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #52
88. A dictionary is not an 'authority'
Edited on Sat Nov-18-06 03:48 PM by Oeditpus Rex
Dictionaries reflect common use. What's acceptable is not necessarily what's correct.



Edit: I thought about it, and in the sense that a dictionary can authorize a certain use, it is an authority. It can also be an arbitrator. But I stand by my original premise that it isn't the final word. (No pun intended.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
34. "Nauseous for nauseated (experiencing nausea) has become so common that to call it an error
Edited on Fri Nov-17-06 06:11 PM by Karenca

is to exaggerate.

First, the nauseous vs. nauseated debate highlights the fact that we speak and write a living language. Usage changes with time. What is considered correct changes, too, albeit at a slower rate. And what is considered correct is heavily affected by usage and effective conveyance of meaning. The editors of style manuals and dictionaries have recognized the shift in usage regarding nauseous/nauseated. So the occasional purist waving his/her arrogant flag demanding that we all must feel nauseated (when we'd rather feel nauseous) has very little real ammunition anymore."


http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:c3n5X96JCEAJ:www.techdirt.com/articles/20060420/026248.shtml+proper+use+word+nauseous&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=12
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
novalib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #34
68. I Think I Understand
I think I understand what you are inferring here.

I also think that 50 states comprise the United States.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
60. saying I AM NAUSEOUS is like saying I AM POISONOUS
that is an easier way of explaining it to folk :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. You can "test" your way "out" of having to take a class.
My oldest took and passed the tests for several math and science classes, got 95s or better, and received the class credits toward his diploma. Why waste sitting in a class for a whole school year if you already know the subject matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
19. "Yeppir"
Can somebody tell me what the hell that means? How do you take the word "yes" and come up with "yeppir"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. A lot, not "alot"
It's two words. :-) One of my biggest peeves, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
novalib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. That's Alright!
Not to worry.

Its alright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhiannon55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
21. "Have went" drives me crazy.
As in "I have went to the store." Aarrgghh!! I'm amazed at how many people say "have went" instead of "have gone". The word "went" can stand alone, as in "I went...". But "gone" needs help from words like "have" or "had".

I know a college teacher who says "have went".

Je-ZUS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewWaveChick1981 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
22. OMG, that makes my brain hurt...
:grr: "Test out" is as bad as "teaching to the test", "up or down vote", "actioning an item", "ramp up", and many others. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pwb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
23. starting a sentence with look or listen.
that really bothers me. maybe google will start a grammer check?.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Oooh and
"Not fer nuthin', but..."

:wtf: does that mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. When I'm really pissed off, I sometimes resort to "Look here!"
Edited on Fri Nov-17-06 06:12 PM by IntravenousDemilo
And when I want someone to pay particular heed to what I'm saying, I often preface it with "Listen..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Irishonly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #35
82. When did test out
become the phrase to describe clepp out? Clepp out was the phrase every one used when I was in college. Looking back, I can see why people always looked at us strangely when we said we had clepped out of a class. I don't know if was a midwestern term.

I hate hearing you know after sentences. I have to resist the urge to yell I don't know because you are telling me.

My grammar skills have slipped over the years but I also think Americans are lazy speakers. We also love slang. Where else can you be swift boated? There are so many others but I am having a mental block.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
novalib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
26. "I'm Like"
So she said, "I saw him yesterday with Vanessa".

And I'm like, "Oh, what was Vanessa wearing?"

And she's like, "Vanessa was wearing leather".

And I'm like, "No!"

And she's like, "For real!"

And I'm Like, "Get OUT!"

And she's like, "Like, you get out".

And I'm like, "Totally"

You Like??!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. ROFL!
Aw man thank you--I needed that! It's been such a day but that made me snarf. (I work around college kids so I hear conversations like that a LOT!) (Alot?)

Oh that made me think of another pet peeve--people who put hyphens everywhere: "Thank-you for the flowers." :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
novalib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Well, I'm Like....
Well, I'm like TOTALLY glad that you're like totally cool with what I wrote.

And I'm like totally bummed that your day was like totally uncool.

So I'm like totally hoping that you're like totally gonna chill.

I'm gonna totally eat something like totally good like for dinner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #30
39. Totally! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. But...
The hyphen is required if you say, "I'm sending him a thank-you card for the flowers."

There are occasions when people omit hyphens where they belong, and that irritates me more. For instance, though you don't need a hyphen in "The piece of bowel is 1.5 cm in length", you do need one in "This is a 1.5-cm length of bowel", since it's a compound adjective. I got fired from my last job because I insisted on using this correct construction in a medical transcription and wouldn't back down when the doctor said it was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Oh absolutely
Sorry I wasn't clear. I am a hyphen freak--I loves me some compound adjectives. I apply them all over the place--where it's appropriate. I just can't stand it when people misuse my lovely little horizontal line, applying it to anything and everything because, for instance, they once saw the compound adjective "thank-you note" and forever after assume that "thank you" needs a hyphen, no matter what the form it takes in the sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #26
73. My daughter does that....
when she starts, I'll hold up my hand and start counting how many times she says 'like'. She gets flustered because she knows what I'm doing and it makes her aware.

A few nights ago, she was relating a story about her best friend and I got up to 47. I'm afraid of how many it would have been if I wasn't counting.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #26
108. On a realted note "I go", "she goes"
Used just like "I'm like"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nuxvomica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
29. I see nothing wrong with "test out"
The "out" implies the expectation of a definitive outcome which "test" alone doesn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert H. Hubert Donating Member (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
37. "try and"
This one makes me want to paint "TRY TO" on a 2x4 and whack the offender upside the head with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
38. Some people can't distinguish between "bring" and "take".
"Bring" is directed towards your present location. "Take" is directed away from where you are.

I mean, really, it's not "I'm going now. I'll bring those papers home with me." Didn't these people watch Sesame Street?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
41. And how about "print out?" What's wrong with just "print?"
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. Gah! It's everywhere!
I suspect a government plot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. And maybe this is a regionalism, but people in CT talk about "passing someone out"
on the highway, instead of just passing them.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. Okay, that's just evil
Your state wins the prize for misuse of "out"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. I yell at my older son every time he says it (he grew up here; I didn't). So at least
you can take some comfort in knowing that I'm trying to fight it.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guava Jelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
45. You would shoot me on sight than
I am the biggest grammar criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Nahhhh
(Insert goomba voice here) (and I can get away with that because I come from a long line of goombas): You, I like. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guava Jelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. thank you for the mercy :o)
I promise ta try ta lern ta be all literate and stuff :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
48. Here is an explanation.
Here is an example from Dictionary.com.

4. to a state of exhaustion, extinction, or depletion: to pump a well out.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #48
62. Thanks, but I'm not buyin' it
"Pump a well out" makes sense--pump it till it's dry of water. But "test out" a product or something till it's...what...dead? out of existence, so it vanishes into thin air due to exhaustion? Nope, until just about a year or so ago, products were "tested"--full stop. This "test out" thingie is new and dang it, I don't like it! :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
51. "Waiting on" someone. The ONLY time you wait ON someone is if you work
in a restaurant as a server. Otherwise, you wait FOR someone.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. And even then, it's questionable.
Edited on Fri Nov-17-06 08:09 PM by reyd reid reed
When you're a server, you're serving.

"Tooken" drives me insane. There's no such word!!!!

And I heard a brand-new one today.

"Intoxification"

:eyes:



edited because I remembered another one - using the wrong word...for instance, another one of today's fun ones: saying 'intersected' instead of 'intercepted' until I wanted to scream.

Okay...I'm done. I'm not going to click on this thread again no matter what occurs to me.

For my sanity.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. Tooken? TOOKEN? My ears would melt if I heard that.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. Yup. Tooken.
And I hear it all the time. No wonder I'm insane.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. Let me whisper in your ear of gerunds, and subjunctives, and sundry other
grammatational goodies, and mahyap it will bring you peace...

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #57
65. Just keep whispering
Edited on Fri Nov-17-06 09:24 PM by reyd reid reed
those little goodies that are so essential to proper expression and I'm yours forever...


:loveya:



Oh...and for the record, I tried. I really, really tried.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #65
75. Well, I, uh, you know, I mean, I'd, um, you see, I, ahem, well...whoa.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #54
61. "Intoxification" sounds like a Bushism, which he likely came up with while "intoxificated". n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #61
64. The madness is spreading...
it does sound like one, doesn't it? That's not where I heard it, though.

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #64
78. I think you have a great handle...
...if I may be so forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #78
80. Awwww...thank you.
:hug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
53. I hate it when the transvestites perpetrate upon the English language too...
:bounce: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #53
63. Yeah! Them TOO!
Darn them anyway!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
66. "Who the Hell" makes no sense. "Who in Hell" does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #66
67. I Love Irony
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #66
72. Who the hell
is a shortening of the phrase 'Who in the hell'. 'in' just dropped out like those lazy prepositions occasionally do. :+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
69. Someone (not you) complaining about someone else's
bad grammEr! Aaaarrrggghhhhhhhhh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
novalib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
70. "Different Than"
One thing differs from another.

So, one thing is different FROM another.

At least, that's my own opinion.

I hope you get what I am inferring here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. Yup...that one's right up there with
"On accident"

GAH!!!!

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #70
76. Yes, I imply what you're inferring.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #76
90. Yes, but
does the inference you're implicationing make you want to do something different than what you would usually do, whether deliberately or on accident?


















Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #90
111. Oh, goody. This one's still alive. I'll help keep it going by posting because I really
like reading this kind of thread (that's not sracasm).

Also, RRR will think of me whether she wants to or not because my reply will show up on her "my posts" list.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #111
112. And it did.
:hi:

And you...sarcastic? Never....























:eyes:

*smooches*

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #112
113. The smooch is a very underrated small pleasure in life. I like 'em.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #113
116. When it comes right down to it,
it's the small pleasures that make life worth living. The little ones that we take for granted every day but, were they to disappear, we would miss desperately.

:hug::hug:

:loveya:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #116
118. Or the ones we DON'T have every day. Such as having someone else wash your hair.
How good does THAT feel?

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
74. OK, grammar police, I have a question for you!
Funner and funnest. Why are they "not words."

I want an explanation, not a rote, "It makes you sound uneducated."

Why is big, bigger, biggest ok, but fun, funner, funnest not ok?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #74
79. No takers?
I guess the explanation is just as I always suspected: there is no real reason, it's just "the way it is."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nuxvomica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #74
83. Strictly speaking, "fun" is a noun while "big" is an adjective
The comparative and superlative word forms -- "-er" and "-est" -- apply to adjectives, like "funny", which can be modified to "funnier" and "funniest". It's not uncommon to see "fun" itself used as an adjective, as in "You're a fun guy." but it's primary use is as a noun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #83
115. That makes some sense
But I would argue that fun as an adjective is as common as fun as a noun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nuxvomica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #115
119. The frequency of it's use as an adjective is immaterial
Because it started out as a noun, the comparative and superlative forms remain noun-like. Language is a code that is dependent for ease of use on the gestalt of each word. While it doesn't bother most folks to hear "We had a fun time" it would bother many to hear "We had the funnest time." "We had the most fun time." may sound stodgy but it's nonetheless clear in meaning. We have no gestalt for "funnest" so when we hear it, it has to be deconstructed to be understood. That requires extra brainwork and the listener may, at least temporarily, think it's a new word that has nothing to do with "fun".
If, however, you want to promote forms like "funnest", you can. Convince enough people to use that form instead of "most fun" and it will prevail if it is found to be easier to use. The best way to do that is in poetry and song, especially if you can find rhymes for "funner" and "funnest". I've caught myself using the word "drownded" because I've listened to "Mary, Don't You Weep" too many times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
novalib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #74
92. Not Just Funner, Funnest
It's not just funner and funnest.

It's also the case that we do not say gooder and goodest.

But I think the reason we don't say funner and funnest is that the word fun is normally used as a noun and not an adjective.

That is, "fun" is most commonly used like this: I had fun at the party.

It is sometimes used like this: I had a fun time at the party. (fun used as an adjective)

I suppose some people say, I had a funner time than you at the party, but I don't know many. A much more common way of expressing that though (and one which uses "fun" as a noun is like this: I had more fun than you at the party.

I don't know anyone who says: I had the funnest time at the party. This sentence is unclear because "funnest" can mean at least two different things: (1) I had more fun than anyone else at the party, or (2) At the party, I had the most fun of my life. (both (1) and (2) are clearer and both use "fun" as a noun.

Using "fun" as a noun -- and not as an adjective -- gives greater clarity in speaking. And using "more fun" and "most fun", instead of funner and funnest provide greater clarity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
novalib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #92
93. "The reason is because"
It's not really that big a deal with me, but it bothers me to hear people say, "The reason is because......"

It is more correct to say, "The reason is that...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ariana Celeste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
77. Grammar doesn't bother me.
If I can understand you, that's all that matters to me. Our language evolves, anyhow. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reverend_Smitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #77
86. I'm with you on that
The only time I have a low tolerance for bad grammar is in a formal academic paper. I guess also writing something for work you should know how to string two sentences together. But if I'm talking to someone or writing on a forum like this, it really doesn't matter to me as long as you don't sound like a total idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #77
96. Language evolves, yes
But that's too often used as an excuse for ignorance, laziness, etc.

If we hold hard to the "language evolves" excuse, before long "wut r u doin" will be acceptable outside chat rooms and text messaging. I can foresee newspapers with "OMG!" in headlines.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flaxbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
84. "try and"... NO! you "try TO"
Drives me crazy, though very respected writers use "try and"...so perhaps that rule has officially relaxed. To try AND do something means you're trying, and you're doing something - two different activities. You usually want to TRY TO do something - as in, try TO be on time, not try AND be on time.

I want to try TO swim, not try AND swim.
I wan to try TO improve my tennis serve, not try AND improve....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertha katzenengel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
85. Split infinitives seem to be more acceptable than when I learned
not to split an infinitive. That just tears me. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
89. I just read this in the local excuse
After rallying from a 14-0 first-half deficit to tie the game in the third quarter, the 'Balers watched Piedmont Hills quarterback Danny Cruz architect a game-winning drive that concluded with a 6-yard touchdown pass to Joe Follen with 2:30 left.

"Architect" is not a verb. If it were, it'd be the wrong one in that context.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #89
91. *I* know that
and *you* know that...but you have to consider the source. These are the Three Marys people. And the Three Bobs (and a Bobbi). And the...

Well...it's all that hard-nosed reporting and looking under rocks in that great news town. It's gone to their heads.

Literally.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #91
94. When they look under rocks, the hed is
GROUND FOUND



BTW — they're advertising for another education reporter.

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #94
95. We just hired a new designer
and I guess we're looking for another features reporter.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #95
97. I think this is the fourth ed reporter since The Carnage
The one they've had for the last year or so was still in high school when she started.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #97
98. Somehow that's just....wrong.
At least here, most of the staffers stick around. They might go from one section to another, but they stay.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #98
99. Would *you* stay at the Flea Ranch?
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #99
101. We ain't talking about *me*
I'm a creature of habit and tend to stay Far past my welcome. But I see your point. It *is* the Flea Ranch, after all.

I wish I had that fuckin' degree, though...I'd jump on that features thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #101
102. Funny, innit?
The median tenure of victims of The Carnage was around six years, and none had any ideas about leaving that I was aware of.

In the three years since The Carnage, they've gone through six EICs, five city editors and Dog knows how many reporters.

I gotta wonder if they think they're better off.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #102
103. Bet they think they are.
They keep bringing in inexperienced kids who'll work for peanuts (okay...a lot of places do that) and then, when they start to figure it out, they bring in a new batch of Twinkies. It's like a Hostess bakery.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #103
104. I dunno
Circulation's way down. You'd think they'd wonder if the revolving door has something to do with it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #104
105. Nope. Betcha anything
that they're looking everywhere else and blaming everything else. If they even bother. There's the little thing about them really not giving a shit. I mean...I haven't seen the print edition and I don't know that I'd want to...just look at what they put out.

It's scary. And it's sad. And it's obvious that the people putting it out don't know what they're doing and that the Powers That Be just don't care.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #105
106. You're probably right
I imagine they're blaming the sales reps and the circ people.

Must be nice to never have to examine one's mistakes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #106
107. Tell me about it.
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KayLaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
100. Product
Frizzy hair? Dry hair? You need product. Get some product.

When did this happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
109. I have a couple of friends who use borrow wrong
Edited on Sat Nov-18-06 07:18 PM by Nikia
As in "I'll borrow that cd to you."
It just feels wrong. I think part of the reason is that it didn't seem to be a common grammar mistake where I grew up.
I know that I use incorrect grammar sometimes and hear incorrect grammar that doesn't bother me. That is because it doesn't sound bad since I grew up hearing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reyd reid reed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #109
110. That's worse than
"Borrow off"


:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trackfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
114. Descriptive, rather than prescriptive, grammar will, in the long run,
appear to be more reasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
117. what's that!?! transvestites are being perpetrated upon the queen's tongue...
why i never x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aein Donating Member (262 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
120. prescriptive grammar = Republican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC