Has anyone noticed? The one exception to condemning the new O.J. book is Fox "News"

[Tab]

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,230347,00.html

The slight glimmer of hope is that most of those responding to his "article" or whatever it was resoundly heaped criticism on him ("Father" Jonathan). Even if Fox wanted to claim his presentation in the guise of being fair and balanced, this book should be beyond the pale even with that argument - it's just a gross premise no matter how you look at it. But to support the book? That's too much. On the other hand, even Bill O'Reilly is critical of Fox.

Is this some weird space-time warp continuum or what?