LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 01:00 AM
Original message |
Hall & Oates "Out of Touch" outsold The Beatles' "Hey Jude" by over two and a half million copies. |
WritingIsMyReligion
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 01:07 AM
Response to Original message |
1. And we give one flying fuck because...? |
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. I think the record sales are standalone evidence of many many flying fucks. n/t |
|
Edited on Sat Dec-02-06 01:12 AM by LoZoccolo
|
Oeditpus Rex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 01:10 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Sales are probably the worst way |
|
to gauge the quality of art.
|
Lex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 01:16 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Does the population growth have anything to do with it? |
cemaphonic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Probably also had something to do with the screwy distribution of Beatles albums |
|
Before their catalog was organized for CD mastering, they were being released by a couple different lables, with different songs on each version so there was a lot of overlap. I think most of the songs on Hey Jude were available elsewhere. It doesn't even exist as a CD release.
|
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. This is a comparison of single sales, not albums. |
|
The album on which "Out of Touch" appeared was titled Big Bam Boom.
|
idgiehkt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 01:24 AM
Response to Original message |
6. If you keep posting these threads |
|
I may just fall in love with you.
:rofl:
(no thanks for the earworm, though)
|
SPKrazy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 01:25 AM
Response to Original message |
7. While Hall And Oates Weren't Bad |
|
to compare them to beatles is just, well sacreligious
|
crispini
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 01:26 AM
Response to Original message |
|
are they bigger than Oasis? :shrug:
|
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. No, but they were the Beatles of the 80s until Terence Trent D'Arby came along. n/t |
Redstone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 01:53 AM
Response to Original message |
11. I knew those guys. Actually Oates more than Hall. Hall was a bit of a prig. |
|
Oates didn't care that I had no idea who he was when we bought each other beer and played each other's guitars. My kind of guy.
Redstone
|
pintobean
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 08:31 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Where did this info come from?
|
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Dec-03-06 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
17. I am sorry; I was under the influence of LSD when this was written. |
LSdemocrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 08:33 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Both good songs, but I would guess there were more people to buy music in the 1980's |
KG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 08:48 PM
Response to Original message |
14. score one for Hall & Oates! |
Magrittes Pipe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 09:02 PM
Response to Original message |
Rabrrrrrr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-02-06 09:04 PM
Response to Original message |
16. This is why popularity is an utterly bankrupt rubric for judging value of art |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:36 AM
Response to Original message |