Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I am totally lost in the scientific world

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Th1onein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-16-06 03:29 PM
Original message
I am totally lost in the scientific world
I love science, but I don't understand this culture that I am entering into. On the one hand, you have the researchers that are frightened of you, and on the other, you have the ones who look down on you because you are not of their world. Then, you've got the ones that want to take from you.

And everything goes so damned slow. And everyone's jockying for funding. And, then, you have to watch out for the pharmaceutical giants, who are out to screw you to the wall, and bury your shit, because they have a lot to lose, if this type of research continues to product.

What a freaking mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
billyskank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-16-06 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Science and commercialism ought to be kept at arms length IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Th1onein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-16-06 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree.
I don't see how anything gets done in a timely fashion, here. It really is a major mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-16-06 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. it's not quite so dog-eat-dog outside of the bio-medical fields....
I wouldn't want to be doing that sort of research.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-16-06 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. yes, it's a messed up culture
What kind of science do you do?

I could complain at length about the culture of science, but then I imagine the alternatives -- you know, cube farms and all that -- and I'm pretty happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Th1onein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-16-06 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I research cystic fibrosis
I am not a "real" scientist, in terms of letters after my name, though. I've done this work because this disease killed my son. I got lucky, because a lot of parents with CF, and people with CF, decided to support my work. I would have done the work anyway, without these people's help, but they certainly facilitated the process. As it is, it took me eleven years, to finally get the answers I needed. I have beaten mainstream science to the answer, but how to go beyond that?

It's just a very strange situation I've gotten myself into. An entire culture that I am unfamiliar with. I am totally out of my element, and walking blind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-16-06 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. You seem like a remarkable person
I think you'll get your bearings. You've gotten this far. I wish you great success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-16-06 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. sometimes it's really important for the researchers
to remember that real people and kids are at the other end of the equation. Good for you for your determination and the willingness to enter into dialogue with the science piece.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-16-06 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. I've worked in the research arena for a long time -
Edited on Sat Dec-16-06 05:30 PM by sparosnare
if you ever want to bounce stuff off me, feel free to PM. I might be able to help in some way - I can at least try. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
some guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-16-06 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is what you were concerned about a couple weeks ago
when you posted about continuing on this line or finding a new disease to dive into.

While I don't have personal experience in all that you're up against, nothing you've written today surprises me. I'm sure it doesn't surprise you either, since you were leaning toward moving on to another disease rather than waging this fight.

Maybe you need a powerful advocate? I was hoping there might be someone in your foundation who would be able to help in that role, but maybe you need to do some research into finding a politician or celebrity or someone like that, who has a personal stake in finding a cure for CF. If you could get in touch with such a person, show them your results to date; they might be able to help you in your battle.

Another option (good thing I type slow, it came to me while typing the above) is to get your work more publicity, via the internet for starters, and then maybe more mainstream magazines or tv.

Are your volunteers still showing good results? I hope so, for their sakes. It will also help you in your own fight. Continued best wishes.

:hug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Th1onein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-16-06 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, and you can see that I made a decision, at least for now.
There's a researcher who has offered to "share" my work with me, by doing some large clinical trials, but he won't disclose what agreements he has with pharmaceutical companies. I've got a problem with that. I've got a patent on my therapy, but if you "share" the trials, etc., you also share the intellectual property rights, patent or not.

There was a paper published just recently, which brought to the fore and underscored some of the basic premises of my work. In fact, the work in it proved one of the major premises of my model of the disease. When I talked to the main author of that work, he was almost crying that there was already a patent on this therapy. As sad as that might be for him, you can imagine what it says to me, and to many of those who suffer or see their children suffer from this disease, about his priorities. Damn.

The volunteers are still showing good results, yes. I guess we're going to have to get publicity, but publicity is not really good if you want serious attention from the scientific world. It is a bit of a "slap in the face" to mainstream science that a group of amateurs got to the finish line before them.

It's just a mess. A freaking mess. And I am disgusted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
some guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Keep on trusting your self
:hug:

You started from point zero, and have got this far by trusting your instincts and research. You've also gone against mainstream science to find your breakthroughs, so it's possible you will end up going against mainstream science all the way to the end.

I wish I had better answers or ways to help...

:hug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dropkickpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-16-06 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. One reason for the funding jockeying is
that, under our beloved :puke: leader, congress managed to slash increases in NIH funding (I think it was a paltry 3% increase, which doesn't even match inflation this year), which has in turn, due to inflation and increasing research costs, become basically a huge cut in available grant funds for research. This means that pilot studies (studies done with very small group to see if a new approach/idea is viable for increased study) are pretty much sitting dead in the water now unless they get piggy-backed on a larger established study, which is hard to do as they pretty much have to spell out everything they want to do, and the grant reviewers are very reluctant right now to give any sort of funds to unproven work. Also, there are researchers who have had established research who are now scrambling. I work in biomedical research at a university, and I've seen what a huge impact this has had on the research community.

Unfortunately for those in university settings, it is harder for them to use pharma funding due to a lot of issues. This just drives researchers to big pharma so that they can continue their research. Hmmmmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC