|
Edited on Sat Jan-10-04 01:32 PM by ldoolin
...with PIRG. Hated it.
I've done door to door and phone canvassing for Democratic congressional candidates, and collecting signatures for ballot initiatives, and loved it.
What's the difference? Why did I hate working for PIRG and last only a week? I think the reason ultimately boils down to a moral issue.
Canvassing for candidates is done with the purpose of convincing voters to get out and vote for your candidate. We only went to the homes of people registered D, I, or third party, so the reception was friendly by and large, and most importantly we weren't there to ask for money. That was a good thing that I felt good about doing, and I'll be doing it again for the 2004 elections.
Canvassing for PIRG has one purpose only: To squeeze as much money out of people as possible. We went to every door, got mostly hostile receptions, and were required to go to the homes of people who were obviously rich and poor alike, retirees struggling on social security, college kids living on ramen, etc. The most odious part of the whole thing is the quota. If you don't make the quota, you don't get paid even minimum wage. How can a group call themselves progressive if they don't even adhere to the basic bare minimum labor standards?
The only people who were successful at canvassing for PIRG and stayed around as the long-term employees were those who obviously had high-pressure sales personalities, the sort of people who could just as easily have been used car salespeople or televangelists - or successful Amway distributors, or panhandlers. It was obvious right from the start that the long-term people weren't there because they believed in PIRG's causes, but because they found it lucrative. Those who were there because we actually believed in their causes as a rule didn't last long.
The long-term people were the ones who became the supervisors, and it was obvious that they were lacking in moral standards and were interested in money and not in the cause. At one point I was canvassing and one of them was following along to see why I wasn't making the quota, and each time I stopped at a place and didn't get any money, they asked why:
"They said they don't have any money." "You see that car in their driveway, it's a BMW. They're lying."
"Well, this lady says she is on social security and can't afford to give." "I don't care, your job is to get her money. Try using some angle to get her to give - you need to have a hook."
If I remember correctly, the supervisors got a bonus depending on how much money the canvassers collected over quota, so it was in their interest to use high pressure tactics on the canvassers to get us to squeeze more money out of people.
There's a moral issue involved here, and I now have a policy of never giving money to ANYONE who uses phone canvassing or door to door canvassing to ask for money. If they're calling or stopping by to talk with me about their candidate, I am friendly. If they are doing so to ask for money, they will get hung up on or the door slammed in their face, and I don't care how "liberal" the group is. There is nothing liberal or progressive about PIRG's canvassing program.
|