Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lust declared virtue, not vice

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Resistance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 03:56 PM
Original message
Lust declared virtue, not vice
BBC Story

Lust has been wrongly branded a vice and should be "reclaimed for humanity" as a life-affirming virtue, according to a top philsopher.

Professor Simon Blackburn of Cambridge University is trying to "rescue" lust, arguing it has been wrongly condemned for centuries, the Sunday Times says.

His campaign is part of an Oxford University Press project on the modern relevance of the seven deadly sins.

According to the Sunday Times, Prof Blackburn has defined lust as "the enthusiastic desire for sexual activity and its pleasures for its own sake".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NightTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Now tell me something I *don't* know!

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mercurius Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. I've always considered lust
to be a perfect compliment to love. Therefore, it must be a virtue. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Torrey Pines Donating Member (147 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. For my 100th post,
I want to tell you that I agree with you completely. Je t'aime, Mercurius. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mercurius Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I certianly liked your 100th post!
Je t'aime, aussi. But you already knew that. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacefreak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. And...
virtue is its own punishment:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Lust isn't great, but given the means to satisfy the lust is destructive.
People lust after money. Most of them can be found in America.

People lust after sex. Most of them can be found in Amsterdam.

People lust after collections of things. Most of them own lots of credit cards.

Lust is bad. The means for obtaining what one lusts after is worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Only if it is mutual and no one gets hurt
In many cultures of the past and present, most people got married around puberty. These marriages were often arranged. If they were lusting, it was usually after someone else's spouse. Adultery, in most cultures, is considered bad and usually someone usually got hurt if this lust was fullfilled, even killed.
Currently in the U.S. most people do not marry so close to going through puberty. More people are marrying later or not at all. Lust is usually a factor in choosing a marriage partner now. This can be good or bad. Dating is usually longer and closer than the trraditional courtship so lust might be necessary as a build up to marriage but it can also blind people into marrying someone incompatible. Some people go through a lusting phase in which they have no desire to find a marriage partner. They want only sex, without a relationship. If their sexual partner does not share the same views, their sex partner will get hurt. Some people lust after people that don't want them. This can lead to sexual harassment or even sexual assult. This is not good either.
Lust is good in a marriage or other committed partnership because it helps bind the couple together and stay interested. I don't know if I'd call it good in other instances although not harmful in some other cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC