Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is this true?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
the_boxer_ Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:17 PM
Original message
Is this true?
Question: Can anyone corroborate this? I'm not sure if this is true.

In violation of Texas law, Wal-Mart has been taking out life
insurance policies on its employees without their knowledge
and naming the company as beneficiary. Another prominent
user of these "dead peasant" insurance policies is, you
guessed it, Enron. The difference between the Enron and
Wal-Mart in this matter is that Enron didn't break Texas Law
as did Wal-Mart. In Texas, it is illegal for any person or
company to take out a life insurance policy on any other
person without telling the person first. Wal-Mart chose to
ignore Texas law when it took some 350,000 dead
peasant policies on employees, including Texas
employees, without telling them. The arrogance of
Wal-Mart in purchasing these policies in defiance of Texas law
is almost beyond belief. Moreover, the proceeds of these
policies have reportedly been used to fund executive
retirement plans.

The ghoulishness of this practice speaks to the utter
disregard - indeed contempt - that Wal-Mart holds for its
"associates". Executives enriching themselves on the
death of their employees. How low can one sink?

I wonder how secure Mr.Coughlin and the rest of the
executives and directors of Wal-Mart would feel if
Wal-Mart employees started purchasing life insurance
on them without their knowledge. Do you think it might
give them cause for concern? There's a reason the Texas law
exists. And, there is need for a similar law at the federal level.

Conclusion: Wal-Mart is a company without a conscience. If
Wal-Mart was a person, the terms "psychopath" or
"sociopath" would apply. But Wal-Mart is a corporation, an
"artificial person" under the law. So, in Wal-Mart's case, there
seems to be a "collective psychopathy" on the part of its
directors and executives. It's time for the Texas Attorney
General take steps to control this monster.




http://www.walmartworkerstexas.com/death_and_money.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
junker Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Langis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't know if they did it without telling them
But they do take out life insurance on their employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Allegedly they did it without telling them...
Edited on Mon Jan-12-04 02:21 PM by Richardo
WTG, WalMart :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir_Shrek Donating Member (340 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes
They settled out of court when a lawsuit was brought though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think it's true.
I think the contract that the workers signed was so convoluted that they literally didn't know they were signing away life insurance...and it certainly wasn't explained to them.

That's what I heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brainshrub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes.
I think it's in the book "Nickled & Dimed" as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yes - and here's a link
to the article in the Austin American Statesman where the case was settled out of court for an undisclosed amount.

http://www.statesman.com/business/content/auto/epaper/editions/saturday/business_f3ff1b75d1b120a800fd.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flightful Donating Member (183 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. Used to be a common practice
A lot of companies took out insurance to cover the cost of survivor benefits. In Wal-Mart's case it was a tax dodge- investment income is taxable but insurance benefits are not, so even though life insurance policies provide a lower return on investment the after-tax return is higher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. It is to protect the company's interests if a resource becomes unusable

Wal-mart incurs costs in processing workers, and although training as such is minimal, for a large company, those costs can add up.

It is merely an additional method of generating revenue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the_boxer_ Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. That's dangerous...the company could end up killing you....
...if the didn't meet quarterly expectations.

How creepy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. The company is in business to maximize profits

Once the traditional capitalist incentives are removed (work hard, make money for the boss, get more money for you), there is a natural transition to the feudalist incentive (work hard, make money for the boss, stay alive)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. "feudalist incentive"...
...hence, "peasants insurance".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skypilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. Unfortunately, it's true.
They actually referred to it as "janitor's insurance" and "peasant insurance". Classy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the_boxer_ Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. Related story...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC