Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-24-07 03:03 PM
Original message |
Can Kohls dept store charge a 5% 'return tax' on items returned past 30 days? |
|
I've never heard of such a tax, but that's what it's called on the receipt...
|
northzax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-24-07 03:09 PM
Response to Original message |
1. usually called a 'restocking fee' or something |
|
but yes, they can set their own return policies, whatever they want them to be, as long as they tell you about them.
|
hippiechick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-24-07 03:15 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I guess, 'cause now it's not "new merch" and if re-shelved |
|
... probably only qualifies as "clearance" instead of being considered "in-season" (ie, full price).
Hey, take it easy on Herb - he needs to make a buck, too. :eyes:
|
Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-24-07 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. I merely asked a simple question. |
|
Edited on Sun Jun-24-07 08:07 PM by HypnoToad
I apologize for apparently sounding so angry and hostile. NOWHERE in my post did I start an anti-Kohls tirade and I am getting sick and tired of being attacked by everybody around here for no reason. :eyes:
Having said that, what you said re: clearance vs in-season is accurate. But I will say, the clothes I returned were new, stickers and labels and all. (They will not take returns on any worn clothing.)
On edit: Clarification On edit 2: Addendum on the first edit to point out why I originally edited it. Some people think if a post is edited (a generalization, not about me personally) it means something was added - not corrected or clarified.
|
Droopy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-24-07 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. I don't think she meant to get under your skin |
|
As for me, I'd rather see you post a hostile attack on Kohls. That is far more entertaining. :)
|
hippiechick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-25-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. Jebus, take a pill already! |
Serial Mom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-25-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Herb hasn't owned or been involved in the Dept Stores since investors bought it in 1986. It's been a public company 1992.
|
hippiechick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-25-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. Does nobody on this site recognize SARCASM anymore? |
LostinVA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-25-07 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. I do -- I understood what you were saying |
|
And was, "WTF?" at the responses you received.
|
hippiechick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-25-07 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
That makes 2 of us :toast:
|
Serial Mom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-25-07 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
20. My response was just what it said - a little FYI |
|
it had nothing to do with understanding your sarcasm.
Thanks for your kindness.
|
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-24-07 03:35 PM
Response to Original message |
3. on the receipt for the return? I have a receipt for Kohl's and there is nothing |
|
on there about a 5% restocking fee.
|
triguy46
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-24-07 08:30 PM
Response to Original message |
|
retailers can define their return terms. A return is not required, but rather a courtesy, though a pretty much universal one.
|
ClassWarfare2008
(378 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-24-07 09:50 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I think some retailers actually get away with 15% |
|
If you can make a case for the merchandise being defective, you might be able to get out of it. But then they would probably exchange, rather than refund.
|
northzax
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-25-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
18. circuit city gets up to 25% "restocking' |
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jun-24-07 09:53 PM
Response to Original message |
|
but it's often negotiable if you bitch enough.
They're out of line calling it a "tax", though. That implies the government makes them collect it, which is untrue.
|
Dr. Strange
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-25-07 09:42 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Yes they can, however... |
|
they cannot demand that you submit to a cavity search.
Trust me on this...
|
ghostsofgiants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-25-07 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
They CAN'T do a cavity search? Boy is my face red.
|
Dr. Strange
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-25-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
I found this out, uh, from a friend of mine...
:evilgrin:
|
Deep13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-25-07 10:05 AM
Response to Original message |
12. Yes, though calling it a tax is a bit misleading. |
|
Edited on Mon Jun-25-07 10:07 AM by Deep13
It is not going to the state.
There is no right to return something after one buys it unless the item is defective. Most retailers allow it anyway, but there is no legal requirement that they do so. Consequently, there is nothing to prevent a retailer from charging a fee to accept a returned item.
|
madinmaryland
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-25-07 01:19 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Its not a tax. Most often refered to as a "restocking fee" |
|
Covers their cost to get it back into their inventory.
In many industries, it can be as high as 15-30%, depending on how well the item is selling.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:56 PM
Response to Original message |