Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm switching antivirus programs...Do I uninstall the old before dowloading the new?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:07 PM
Original message
I'm switching antivirus programs...Do I uninstall the old before dowloading the new?
I also posted on the Computer & Tech Issues board; but I'm feeling impatient today...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. That Bytes
The memory model of an architecture is strongly influenced by the word size. In particular, the resolution of a memory address, that is, the smallest unit that can be designated by an address, has often been chosen to be the word. In this approach, address values which differ by one designate adjacent memory words. This is natural in machines which deal almost always in word (or multiple-word) units, and has the advantage of allowing instructions to use minimally-sized fields to contain addresses, which can permit a smaller instruction size or a larger variety of instructions.

When byte processing is to be a significant part of the workload, it is usually more advantageous to use the byte, rather than the word, as the unit of address resolution. This allows an arbitrary character within a character string to be addressed straightforwardly. A word can still be addressed, but the address to be used requires a few more bits than the word-resolution alternative. The word size needs to be an integral multiple of the character size in this organization. This addressing approach was used in the IBM 360, and has been the most common approach in machines designed since then.
There are design considerations which encourage particular bit-group sizes for particular uses (e.g. for addresses), and these considerations point to different sizes for different uses. However, considerations of economy in design strongly push for one size, or a very few sizes related by multiples or fractions (submultiples) to a primary size. That preferred size becomes the word size of the architecture.

Character size is one of the influences on a choice of word size. Before the mid-1960s, characters were most often stored in six bits; this allowed no more than 64 characters, so alphabetics were limited to upper case. Since it is efficient in time and space to have the word size be a multiple of the character size, word sizes in this period were usually multiples of 6 bits (in binary machines). A common choice then was the 36-bit word, which is also a good size for the numeric properties of a floating point format.

After the introduction of the IBM System/360 design which used eight-bit characters and supported lower-case letters, the standard size of a character (or more accurately, a byte) became eight bits. Word sizes thereafter were naturally multiples of eight bits, with 16, 32, and 64 bits being commonly used.
Most of these machines work on one unit of memory at a time and since each instruction or datum is several units long, each instruction takes several cycles just to access memory. These machines are often quite slow because of this. For example, instruction fetches on an IBM 1620 Model I take 8 cycles just to read the 12 digits of the instruction (the Model II reduced this to 6 cycles, but reduced the fetch times to 4 cycles if one or 1 cycle if both address fields were not needed by the instruction). Instruction execution took a completely variable number of cycles, depending on the size of the operands.
--------------
Then you screw the wangdoozle nut tight after you insert the CD into the drive...........Oh wait
that is what I did last night............:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :hi:

Actually I have no idea how you do that...............

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Ask a simple question
and get a complex answer. :spank::rofl:

I'm switching to an online version. I already downloaded it; but I'm thinking I should remove my old anti-virusware before installing the new one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omphaloskepsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Un-install it before you install the new one.
It will be fine to have it on while you download the new one. It is a bad idea to have two anti-virus programs running at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Thanks!
That's what I thought... :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Program
What he said................:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes.
Having two antivirus programs on your computer at the same time (or two firewalls for that matter) is never a good thing. There is always the potential for conflict and you never know if the subsequent uninstallation will delete a DLL needed by the other program. It's best to clean your old AV software off first, restart your machine, and then immediately install the new.

Of course, if your new AV software comes as a self-contained .exe file, there's no reason you can't download it before you uninstall the old. Just don't install it until you do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Oh good!
Because that's what I just did.

I guess I'll log off and do the install now.

Thanks for replying! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. You almost have to
Antivirus progs are very turf-oriented. Not like antispyware apps where you have several on the same machine without much commotion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. It's good to know about the antispyware ones too...
I'm trying AVG's, and I was wondering if I'd need to delete AdAware.
Thanks for your post! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
astral Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. No, you don't have to delete Adaware
It's not an anti-virus program. You can have both, and the Castellini on Computers program has also recommend Spy-Bot Search and Destroy. I have switched from Norton to AVG and it seems to take care of thing fine. The free version is usually the one recommended for home computers, although they do have a paid subscription version as well.

If you use Firefox instead of Internet Explorer as your browser it helps too. You can keep Internet Explorer on your machine, though, for when you want it or when Microsoft needs to go home (it won't use Firefox).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. AVG instead of Norton?
Is this a good move? I would like to dump Norton because of bloating and poor performance? I know AVG is free, does it keep your machine as secure as the pay AntiViruses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Better
Norton sucks big green ones. Another good free antivirus is antivir, I use the free version I think it's http://www.antivir.com it updates almost daily and I love it. The guard has saved my bacon a few times now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Thanks, I will give it a try
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatholicEdHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Ok, I installed it but the free license is only gooduntil Nov 30
After that I have to pay again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-28-07 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I asked about this in the Tech Issues forum...
and received a thumbs up for AVG from RoyGBiv, who makes a living knowing about this stuff. He said the free version is as effective as the one you pay for. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC