Rabrrrrrr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 02:34 PM
Original message |
Are Oasis really the new Beatles? |
ghostsofgiants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message |
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message |
2. No, the Beatles are the old Oasis. |
HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 02:36 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Yes, but Bush is the new Oasis. |
supernova
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 02:38 PM
Response to Original message |
4. No, but Oasis are quite |
|
comical, in that charming not-meaning-to-be way.
Music is pretty good, if not very deep. Time will tell of they are capable of something other than grandiose self-absorption.
|
Writer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 03:04 PM
Response to Original message |
5. No, but congrats for writing like a Brit. ;) |
Rabrrrrrr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
Efilroft Sul
(827 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 03:16 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Oasis is the new ELO, which was the old Beatles. |
|
Everything old is new again.
|
Zywiec
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 03:18 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Are they even still together? |
|
I haven't heard from them in years.
|
KG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 03:25 PM
Response to Original message |
8. masters of the profound album titles: |
|
'definitely maybe' 'don't believe the truth' :eyes:
|
Dukkha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 03:43 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Beatles are as popular and revered now as in the 60's |
|
The band members and recordings will continue to be played, discussed, disected, analyzed, and covered for many more decades. They weren't just famous, they were important. Oasis dissapeared like a fart in the wind. Just a bunch of obnoxious self absorbed brits who got lucky.
|
Debi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 03:48 PM
Response to Original message |
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 03:49 PM
Response to Original message |
11. No, 30 Seconds to Mars is. |
johnnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 03:51 PM
Response to Original message |
12. I thought it was going to be The Knack |
Burma Jones
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 03:52 PM
Response to Original message |
13. I thought it was the Bay City Rollers |
MAGICBULLET
(606 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 04:11 PM
Response to Original message |
|
as much as Destiny's Child are the new Supremes
|
Bryan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-27-07 02:24 AM
Response to Original message |
16. The new Happy Mondays, maybe |
|
but not the new Beatles.
Say, while we're at it, who would qualify as "the new Beatles"?
|
Ptah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-27-07 02:32 AM
Response to Original message |
17. This is the you tube. Spell on me. |
triguy46
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-27-07 08:14 AM
Response to Original message |
18. Haven't they been the new Beatles for about 15 years? |
mikeytherat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-27-07 08:29 AM
Response to Original message |
19. Oasis? What about Blur? How about some love for Blur? |
edbermac
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-27-07 08:47 AM
Response to Original message |
20. No, they're the male version of the Spice Girls. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 14th 2024, 06:55 AM
Response to Original message |