Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Quiz: Differences in Lord of the Ring Book vs. Movie

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 04:12 PM
Original message
Quiz: Differences in Lord of the Ring Book vs. Movie
http://www.quizilla.com/users/MayitBe/quizzes/***Differences%20in%20Lord%20of%20the%20Ring%20Book%20vs.%20Movie***/

My Result:

****Wizard****
You have obviously tread the many intricate roads of middle earth and know the differences between the true story and Peter Jackson's adaption
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Book Lover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. I got the same result, but
weird that there was no info on what I had gotten right or wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. yeah
I got the same result too, but wanted to see which questions I got right and which ones wrong.

Oddly, I guessed on many of the answers - I read the books once over 30 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I know that's a bit annoying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Me too
Weird that it wouldn't be displayed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dukkha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. i didn't expect to do that well either
if someone who really knows the answers post them so I can see what I got right and wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
28. I sense many of us want to know the totally correct answers, so: Spoiler subthread
Like most of us (and those taking the quiz), I got 'wizard'. If we pool our answers, we may get the right ones (if Illuvatar feels like chipping in, that might help ...)

I said:

Which of these is in the movie but not in the book? Farmer Maggot chases hobbits off his land
Which of these eleves is in the book but not the movie? Gildor
When Frodo crosses the ford to escape the nazgul who is he riding with, if anyone (for the book and then for the movie) Book: Frodo - Movie: Arwen
All of these scenes the movie cuts out except for which one? Bilbo's birthday speech
Which of these scenes is implied but not described in the book, but is emphasized in the movie Boromir's death scene
Check all characters missing from movie
Tom Bombadil
Goldberry
Gildor
Mr.Proudfeet
Bill Ferny
Radagast

(ie everyone but Gollum)

I suspect that "Mr. Proudfeet" (sic - the joke is meant to be that he is Mr. Proudfoot, but in the plural they are meant to be called the 'Proudfeet') is the one I've most likely got wrong - I really can't remember if they put that in the film or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. My result: Illuvatar. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I got Wizard
Illuvatar must be the highest score so I'm wondering what I missed.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reciprocity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. ****Wizard****

You have obviously tread the many intricate roads of middle earth and know the differences between the true story and Peter Jackson's adaption
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wizard n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ironflange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wizard!


I'm not even a real LOTR geek; read it twice, seen each movie once.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wiz!
Piece of cake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. ****Wizard****
:bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :bounce:

I love LOTR

You have obviously tread the many intricate roads of middle earth and know the differences between the true story and Peter Jackson's adaption


72 other people got this result!
This quiz has been taken 2716 times.
86% of people had this result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. What was the most jarring change in the films?
No Old Forrest/Bombadil/Barrow Downs
Elves at Helms Deep
No Scouring of the Shire

There are many others but these are the ones that jump out at me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. In terms of Jarring
I would say the Elves at Helms Deep. That was the thing that jumped out. Perhaps because it was something Added instead of absent, the story is a rich and complex one but PJ selected Frodo getting the Ring to the mountain as The Focus so the absence of things like Bombadil and the Scouring didn't detracted from that more limited scope (whereas they do detract from the larger web of story and imagination JRRT created) and the Elves at Helm's Deep for me at least at once reminded me that the story I was seeing in the Movie was different and somewhat disconnected from the larger story of JRRT's mythology because they never would've been there in the context of that literary mythology.

But the absence of the Scouring of the Shire, or perhaps something that wasn't on your list, Sam using the ring, might be 'more significant' in terms of departure from the books but being absences there wasn't that 'jarring' realization while watching the movie that the 'addition' of the Elves had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Even the absenses were jarring
When they went straight from the Shire to Bree, that was jarring. When Strider shows up and passes out the blades, I was already wondering what they were going to do with Merry, Eowyn and the Witch King since in the book, the hobbits get their magic "Westernesse" blades Bombadil rescues them from the Barrow-Wight.

Not trying to come down too hard on Peter Jackson here because no film can capture the depth of the novel.

But it's harder to justify leaving out entire segments when other segments are pure invention. The whole attack by the warg riders with Aragorn being swept over the cliff was a complete invention for the film. Never happened in the book.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reciprocity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I don't have so much a problem about leaving out Tom Bombadil, as I do leaving out the Barrow Downs.
For those who read the books you may remember that it was in the Barrow Downs that Tom Bombadil gives each hobbit a dagger from the barrow-wight's treasure pile in The Fellowship of the Ring. This is significant because without the dagger Merry would not have broken the spell on the Witch-king of Angmar that allowed Eowyn to destroy him. There was a prophecy that “ not by the hand of Man shall he fall”

From ROTK...
"Out of the wreck rose a Black Rider, tall and threatening, towering above her. With a cry of hatred that stung the very ears like venom he let fall his mace. Her shield was shivered in many pieces, and her arm was broken; she stumbled to her knees. He bent over her like a cloud, and his eyes glittered; he raised his mace to kill.
But suddenly he too stumbled foward with a cry of bitter pain, and his stroke went wide, driving into the ground. Merry's sword had stabbed him from behind, shearing through the black mantle, and passing up beneath the hauberk had pierced the sinew behind the mighty knee.

<Snip>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So passed the sword of the Barrow-downs, work of Westernesse. But glad would he have been to know its fate who wrought it slowly long ago in the North-kingdom when the Dunedain were young, and chief among their foes was the dread realm of Angmar and its sorcerer king. No other blade, not though mightier hands had wielded it, would have dealt that foe a wound so bitter, cleaving the undead flesh, breaking the spell that knit his unseen sinews to his will.
LOTR, ROTK chapter 6.


If Merry had not had the blade of Westernesse, the Witch-king would still be with us.
This sword was made specifically to kill the king of Angmar. This was before he became a wraith, I believe. Like Sting, this was a magic sword. His spirit still lived even though his body had long been dead. Only a magic sword was able to destroy the spell that held

The one thing Jackson did that I don't think anyone else could have done, was the environment the story was taken place in. The absolute smartest decision Jackson made in the entire movies was to hire Alan Lee and John Howe. Both have been artist of Tolkien's world for decades. And it was there art on the wall that inspired Jackson and Walsh as they wrote the screenplay for the movies. They were the driving force behind the look and feel of the movies along with of landscape of New Zealand. Because of there work I am able to overlook all changes to the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. I guess they could have had the Barrow Downs without Bombadil
but for the sake of the movie, the blades they were given seemed rather ordinary.

As far as Glorfindel's prophecy that no man could ever defeat the Witch King, let us not forget Éowyn, like Merry, also not a man.

I've always interpreted it as Merry's blade of Westernesse breaking the spell, rendering him mortal for at least a time. Long enough for Éowyn to deliver the kill.

In the film, without the prophecy, without the magic blade, it just made the Witch King along with the rest of the Nazgul, rather pathetic.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Not having the Scouring of the Shire SUCKED
I also missed Tom Bombadil, and Glorfindel. And I didn't like all the extra stuff with Saruman and Gandalf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. Shelob's Lair
I'm surprised that nobody has mentioned the whole Shelob Lair scene in ROTK that was TOTALLY invented with Frodo turning against Sam because of Gollum's machinations, as well as Frodo throwing Gollum off the cliff. That....was....NOT.....in....the....book at all! That scene nearly ruined for me what was otherwise a great movie (the extended cut anyway).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionaryActs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. The two things that I loathed; one, making Faramir into such an ass
And having him take Frodo and Sam back to Osgiliath. :banghead: That made me so mad, because I love Faramir so much(one of my favorites) and to have him almost take the ring goes against everything he is in the books! :o
And taking out the Scouring of the Shire, because that was so important for the whole story!


Re: the Elves at Helms Deep, at least it was a really cool fight scene! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. The movie wasn't kind to any of the lords of Gondor
Denethor was made loony from the start, with no explanation given. Like the fact that his mind had been poisoned by Sauron via a Palantir? In the book Denethor orders the becons lit, even before Gandalf and Pippin arrive. He also doesn't send Faramir and his company on the suicide mission.

In the TT extended edition there is a scene where Denethor was sent to Rivendell for the Council of Elrond and instructed to seize the ring and bring it to Minas Tirith. None of that happens in the book. It turns Boromir into some kind of double agent within the Fellowship and a much more sinister character.

And of course everything you already said about what was done to Faramir's character.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'm a wizard.
Funny, I almost got tripped up on the "implied but not seen scene" question. Then I remembered: both The Bakshi LOTR and the Jackson LOTR show Boromir's death scene, which the book only refers to in the past tense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. Another Wizard checking in. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionaryActs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
22. I's a wizard! I's a wizard
go me, go me! :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reciprocity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
24. One more quiz.
Who is your Lord of the Rings love match?

http://film.guardian.co.uk/quiz/questions/0,,855242,00.html

Me.....
Who is your Lord of the Rings love match?
Faramir. You seek a man who is cultured, dutiful, and morally upright. A man who takes the trouble to clean under his fingernails. A perfumed dandy, in short. You're welcome to him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 04:16 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. I don't have to take the quiz
Eowyn

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Niccolo_Macchiavelli Donating Member (641 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
27. Wizard
i wonder what i got wrong if there's an Illuvatar ranking


What pissed me most of was the the extensive use of of the Dimholt ghosts in the battle of Minas Tirith. In the Books they only seized the Ships and the Armies on the Ships consisted of ex-captives of the corsairs and people they picked up underways.

Also the Elves at Helms Klamm shoot in the same hole...

it shoulda have been the introduction of the age of men but the use of elves instead of the rallied remains of the westfold army and ghosts instead of the Forces of Anduin domains (i fumed) foiled the message.

I'd rather seen the humans fight than some deus ex-machina mop-up-mr. propper ghost army. It made the human effort to rally forces kinda pointless if the ghosts could beat Mordors army free of losses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC