datasuspect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 04:48 PM
Original message |
Poll question: what do you think about having multiple partners behind your SO's back |
|
?
if what they don't know doesn't hurt them, does that make it acceptable to you?
|
Deja Q
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 04:50 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Even if the SO wanted an orgy, it's wrong, dangerous, and stupid. |
|
Even if both SO and I wanted to have an "open" relationship and circumvent any heartache (in theory), the risk of STDs will always be there and condoms aren't a panacea either. Neither is Zovirax.
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 04:50 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Completely immoral, which means it is totally awesome and sweet |
|
If you can swing it, do it, if your SO has problems then maybe they need to become and ex-SO
|
datasuspect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. and stop being such a stick in the mud and shit |
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Drink, smoke, be evil! |
datasuspect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. more than 50% of marriages end in divorce |
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. If she's busting your balls now, it means that she never really loved you anyway! |
|
The kids probably aren't yours. Run away, never let her know where you are, and by no means should you EVER send a check!
|
datasuspect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. I went to sleep last night, I work as hard as I can-a |
|
I bring home my money, you take my money, give it to another man I should have quite you, baby-a, oh, such a long time ago-ho
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. So I guess the coclusion is: go for it, sleep around |
skygazer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 05:05 PM
Response to Original message |
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. Yes it is. An offer from me. |
datasuspect
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. there's plenty of datasuspect to go around |
|
i saw your heart before you were born. i am love.
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. *mutters* damn he's smooth. I bettter stalk up on wine-coolers and champale if I'm to compete |
skygazer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Well, it said "multiple" |
|
Why do you have to compete?
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. ooohhhh, I believe we have a "brazen hussy" on our hands |
|
Edited on Sun Sep-16-07 05:09 PM by JVS
As Mr. Burns would say: Excellent!
|
skygazer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
16. Yeah, but I don't drink those crap wine coolers or champale, buster |
|
Good bourbon or vodka only.
|
crim son
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Perceived morality aside, it is sad |
|
especially but not only if the partner believes that s/he is in a loving, monogamous relationship.
|
Rabrrrrrr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 05:13 PM
Response to Original message |
17. It's what being a family-hating flag-burnin' liberal is all about! |
TOhioLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 06:04 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Immoral and unethical... |
|
Edited on Sun Sep-16-07 06:09 PM by TOhioLiberal
...who knows what you'd be bringing home with you.
Edited cause I can't speel gud.
|
BarenakedLady
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 06:39 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Ahhh you said "multiple" |
Bryan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 07:01 PM
Response to Original message |
|
...not to mention callous, selfish, and risky from an STD communicability standpoint. Ongoing dishonesty is destructive to relationships.
Now, having multiple partners that your SO knows about and always taking precautions with them-or safely partaking of multiple partners and having no SO whatever-is a whoooooole other kettle of fish.
|
triguy46
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 07:05 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Seems like you would need to redefine "significant' to mean something like |
|
just another piece of ass.
|
Redstone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 07:07 PM
Response to Original message |
22. I would not do it. Not even ONE "secret parter." But that's just me. |
MrsMatt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 08:38 PM
Response to Original message |
|
it doesn't matter what your partner knows or doesn't know. It diminshes you as a person.
|
Nikia
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Sep-16-07 08:51 PM
Response to Original message |
24. I think it is a bad idea |
|
Immoral and too much work. On the otherhand...No there is no other hand.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:45 AM
Response to Original message |