This is totally compounding the mistake made in the Brazil game. I'm also a bit skeptical about how independent the team leaders were in this decision, but if it was their decision alone then they're full of it.
Here's why:
1) What Hope said is not that bad, and was made under frustration.
2) Although it's a third place game, it's not totally meaningless, it's for the tangible result of a $10,000 bonus, and the intangible of scavenging some dignity. So she said something, her comments didn't lose the game. Deal with it for one more game and then do what you're going to do. Hope is objectively still the best goalkeeper here.
3) This has happened before. Only in that case it was Brianna Scurry 'dissing' the starting goalkeeper at the time Siri Mullinix:
"If she (Brianna) had been the starting goalkeeper four years ago in Sydney, the U.S. women's soccer team would have won the gold medal.
``I put myself into that entire game,'' she said. ``And I've always felt -- and I still feel -- that if I were playing, we would have won.''
http://www.usateamhandball.org/11723_22487.htmI put the dissing in quotes because I don't feel it was wrong then and it's not wrong now. But since the team does feel it's wrong now, what happened back then?
This is Jackass Ryan's decision coming back turning into an avalanche of hurt. This blog entry from a soccer enthusiast sums up my feelings. Here's a snippet:
"It's disappointing for me to hear Foudy, of all people, call Solo out for her honesty and say that she wouldn't want to play in front of her. Foudy was famous for saying all sorts of things, and some of them weren't very nice. She let herself be human and spoke candidly, yet she won't allow the next generation to do the same?"
http://sidelineviews.blogspot.com/2007/09/playing-cute-card.html