TXlib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-30-04 03:51 PM
Original message |
Of the net 2 million+ unemployed since * took over... |
|
How many will vote D in the next election?
Statistically, there are (I think) about roughly equal numbers of die-hard Ds and Rs, so there must be about as many Rs who are long-term out of work as Ds.
How many of those Rs are going to continue to vote R?
|
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-30-04 03:54 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Most of them just will not admit to themselves that the R's have anything to do with it.
700K will still vote R. The other 200K -- well let's just see if we can get Pat to run. :)
|
TXlib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-30-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. The Dems need to fund a good classical conservative Libertarian |
|
candidate, somebody all the POed, disgruntled Rs can take their vote, when they don't want to cast it for *, and can't give it to the D candidate.
The repubs funded Nader's campaign in 2000... I say, payback's a bitch!
|
Kamika
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-30-04 04:09 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Fri Jan-30-04 04:10 PM by Kamika
if you go by statistics
The sheep have no goddamn clue.. they will vote for Bush and say its the unions fault because they force the companies to move out
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:44 AM
Response to Original message |