Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Astrological Info On Remaining Dems

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 02:30 PM
Original message
Astrological Info On Remaining Dems
John Kerry, born on Dec. 11, 1943, is a Sagittarius with four Gemini planets in the public relationship sector of his birth chart. He has a judicial character, but also has little tolerance for fools. Born with the rare Mars retrograde, he entered life with a rage — a deep, inner need to overcome (the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. also had the Mars retrograde). He has a strong sense of responsibility as well as feelings of caution about his message. Over the last 18 months the planets have empowered him with core strength. The long-term picture depicts him achieving his highest goals

Howard Dean was born on Nov. 17, 1948, with a Scorpio Sun and Gemini Moon. Thus, Dr. Dean's character contains a paradox: he is both deep and shallow. He can be cool and distant or passionate and intense. The position of two of the planets in his chart shows erratic energy and emotional volatility. His horoscope for June 2003 through the coming spring shows a period of soul searching. Astrologically, it is a time of the mythic "brother battle," in which Mr. Dean's confrontations with others really reflect his own inner conflict.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/03/opinion/03SULL.html

Clark is a Capricorn / more presidents have been Capricorns, followed by Leos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CabalBuster Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. A very biased astrological chart favoring Kerry, the NYT is appalling n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDaddyLove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-03-04 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Do you mean the NYT is appalling for reporting what's.....
in Kerry's chart, or appalling because they're reporting it at all?

If it's there, it's there.....I'm not sure why that's appalling.

The fact that they consider this important enough to report is odd, but I don't find it appalling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC