Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 05:36 PM
Original message |
|
My local independent bookstore, which is fantastic (caused a Waldenbooks across the street to go under and has thrived with a Borders just down the block) carries a HUGE variety of magazines.
I just bought "Blue" there, which is a gay-oriented art magazine featuring LOTS of full-frontal male nudity. I can buy any political magazine there, and any gay magazine. But they don't carry Playboy.
Does that strike others as odd? Is Playboy really THAT objectionable these days?
|
Kamika
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Bet it is considered too lame |
Richardo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. That's funny, Kamika... |
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. it'd be hard to believe |
|
that some of the very obscure magazines they carry are more popular than Playboy.
|
BigDaddyLove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Most of the competing magazines have gotten downright disgusting, which is what it seems people want these days.
So much for at least an attempt to make it artistic.
|
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. they don't carry any other "girlie" magazines, either |
|
But Playboy is a lot tamer than most others, and does indeed publish great authors and worthwhile interviews.
|
BigDaddyLove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
11. Authors and interviews? |
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
well, as a gay man, that's all I notice.
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
16. There is a magazine that has interviewed Mark Crispin Miller... |
|
author of the Bush Dyslexicon, has a right-wing asshole of the month every month, and this month has an interview with someone who is about to begin a year long jail sentence for hosting an anarchist website. See if you can guess the magazine of which I speak.
|
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
|
what's the point of this guessing game?
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
22. To see who is knowledgable in the genre |
|
I'll tell in a little while or after a few guesses are made
|
BigDaddyLove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
|
They also had an ad proclaiming a national day of prayer for the death of Bill O'Reilly
|
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
|
I'm still not seeing the relevance to this thread.
|
BigDaddyLove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
32. I didn't see mentioned in your original post whether or not....... |
|
Edited on Tue Feb-03-04 06:30 PM by BigDaddyLove
the store sold other 'porn' magazines and you were wondering about the absence of Playboy.....you mentioned the availability of 'Gay' magazines but not 'straght' ones.
|
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
33. I mentioned elsewhere they don't carry |
|
any "girlie" magazines, meaning Playboy, Penthouse, Hustler, etc.
I find Playboy the interesting one because it seems so mainstream. Hustler is just pornography. Penthouse is somewhere in the middle.
Of course, I haven't seen any of them in years, so I don't know that's still true.
|
BigDaddyLove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
34. I can only guess that if they in fact don't carry any of the 'girlie'.... |
|
magazines that they include Playboy in that group regardless of the other things (articles) that it offers because of the fleshy content.
|
Kamika
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
I meant that included in 'lame'
|
NightTrain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Back when I was into so-called "men's magazines," I only ever bought HUSTLER and PENTHOUSE.
PLAYBOY is for uptight rich guys who need to be told what wines to drink and which brand of high-end stereo to buy. And the photo spreads never show the pink stuff! Christ, would they run pictures of men without testicles?! (And I'm not talking about Bush and his cabinet.)
|
BigDaddyLove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
20. In my ever so humble opinion, the 'pink stuff' isn't everything.... |
|
Edited on Tue Feb-03-04 06:06 PM by BigDaddyLove
which is why I like the Playboy photographers...they are (mostly) artists.
|
Whitacre D_WI
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
26. Helmut Newton and Herb Ritts are geniuses. |
|
Truly brilliant photographers of the human form.
Not simply "nudie pic" photogs, these guys are responsible for high art, both in Playboy and in galleries.
|
BigDaddyLove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
|
They had an appreciation for the female form which is sorely lacking in 'porn' these days.
Newton died two weeks or so ago, so you'd have to say he 'was' a genius.
|
Whitacre D_WI
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
|
R.I.P. Helmut Newton.
You was a hell of an artist.
|
BigDaddyLove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
29. Car accident in L.A. I believe. |
Shrek
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 05:38 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Maybe it just doesn't sell? |
|
I dunno, just guessing . . . but that might be a valid reason not to carry it.
|
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
I've spoken to employees there - it's a "political" decision.
|
GoddessOfGuinness
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
mitchum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
30. He's actually a lifelong Democrat... |
|
but he still has a banal mind. I'll take Bob Guccione's porn aesthetic any day.
|
Bryan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-04-04 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
Playboy has a strong underlying interest in civil-libertarian issues that can tilt left (mocking uptight Republicans) or right (skewering PC) depending on who's writing the features in a given issue. Back when I had a subscription, the "Playboy Forum" section edited by James R. Petersen was a consistently interesting forum for freedom-of-expression issues. The features are often excellent, as well; I would recommend Molly Ivins' profile of Tom Delay from the May '99 issue.
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 05:46 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Why would anyone want Playboy? |
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
|
because they've published authors like Hemingway, Steinbeck, Kerouac, Alex Haley, Gore Vidal, Updike, Joyce Carol Oates and many others.
|
NightTrain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
19. That was a lo-o-o-ong time ago, Dookus. |
|
Has PLAYBOY done anything of note in the past, say, 25 years? Not that I'm aware of.
Sadly, the magazine that helped usher in the Sexual Revolution seems to have been completely overwhelmed by it.
|
Dookus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
|
I'm not trying to get into a debate on the merits of Playboy magazine. I find it much more interesting that in this day and age, a very progressive independent bookstore still refuses to carry it.
But a quick search shows they published Arthur C. Clarke in 2001, Gabriel Garcia Marquez in 1993, Nadine Gordimer in '91, Jay McInerney in '97, Joyce Carol Oates in 2002, Chuck Palahniuk in 2001, Mickey Spillane in '96, Paul Theroux in 2000, Scott Turow in 2000, Kurt Vonnegut in '97 et. al.
|
madrchsod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 05:54 PM
Response to Original message |
13. any magazine that features |
|
naked women is evil in the eyes of many. rockford ,il the third largest city in il ,just recently let borders sell playboy and penthouse. rockford has banned all nude magazines and x rated movies for years. it`s not playboy, it`s a womans body they find objectionable...
|
BigDaddyLove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
18. That's a shame, because a woman's body is......... |
|
anything but objectionable.
|
Whitacre D_WI
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Feb-03-04 05:54 PM
Response to Original message |
14. I let my subscription lapse... |
|
...after the Darva Conger pictorial.
:scared:
|
Loonman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-04-04 07:17 AM
Response to Original message |
36. Playboy is lame, anyway |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:51 PM
Response to Original message |