Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

O'Reilly now skeptical about Bush & Co. Apologizes to Viewers...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 01:37 PM
Original message
O'Reilly now skeptical about Bush & Co. Apologizes to Viewers...
Edited on Tue Feb-10-04 01:39 PM by YellowRubberDuckie
:wow:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20040210/people_nm/campaign_bush_oreilly_dc_3
<snip>"I was wrong. I am not pleased about it at all and I think all Americans should be concerned about this," O'Reilly said in an interview with ABC's "Good Morning America."

"What do you want me to do, go over and kiss the camera?" asked O'Reilly, who had promised rival ABC last year he would publicly apologize if weapons were not found.

O'Reilly said he was "much more skeptical about the Bush administration now" since former weapons inspector David Kay said he did not think Saddam had any weapons of mass destruction. <end snip>

On edit: I need to read the rest of the fucking article before being shocked. He actually says that Smirk didn't lie purposely and blames Clinton. Somethings never change.

Well, things are looking really bad for Bush now. One of his main ass lickers is now having doubts.
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hong Kong Cavalier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. He apparently mumbled an apology.
And managed to blame Tenet in almost the same breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventhson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I wish we got an apology from Kerry
and HE's blaming Tenet instead of accepting blame too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NWHarkness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It was half-assed but that's OK
All Joe Public is going to come away from the story with is "Gee, even O'Reilly thinks Bush is a bum."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gringo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. O'Reilly is a stupid, stupid, stupid man
Not quite as stupid as dim son, but he's down there with the "Fox & Fiends" crew and people like Britney Spears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adams Wulff Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. We've been waiting for this, BUT...
There is a huge difference between apologizing on GMA and apologizing on you own friggin show, O'Reilly!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. How long have you been waiting for hell to freeze over?
O'Reilly won't apologize on his show for a damned thing - he will always blame others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VermontDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. He still found a way to blame Clinton though
While critical of President Bush, O'Reilly said he did not think the president intentionally lied. Rather, O'Reilly blamed CIA Director George Tenet, who was appointed by former President Bill Clinton.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC