Tindalos
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-24-08 12:38 PM
Original message |
What's with Nader and the mushrooms? |
|
Help out a lowly Canuck here, please. I've heard of Nader and... um... that's about it.
His name is everywhere this morning, always accompanied by a picture of mushrooms. Why? What am I missing? :shrug:
|
FloridaJudy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-24-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message |
|
When it comes to Ralph Nader.
As to the mushrooms: I'm clueless. Unless it's the old saying "I must be a mushroom - they feed me shit, and I'm always in the dark".
|
Tindalos
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-24-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
It was the mushrooms that confused me.
|
havocmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-24-08 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. Then, there is the mushroom's tendency to just pop up every cycle |
|
Mushrooms are the visable, reproductive expression of an organism that is basically not seen at any other time.
Ralph pops up to get off every four years.
|
Connonym
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-24-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Or "if he thinks he's going to get elected he must be on shrooms" |
|
I'm practicing extensive self-control in not going on a rant filled with foul language.
|
Tindalos
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-24-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Well, that makes sense too. |
|
And, don't hold back on my account.
|
philosophie_en_rose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-24-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message |
5. They both thrive on shit. |
Tindalos
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-24-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. I wondered if there was an inside joke I was missing |
|
Maybe it's a make-up-your-own-punchline joke. :shrug:
|
Adsos Letter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-24-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:12 AM
Response to Original message |