Further proof of my boredom today....

[SacredCow]

I ended up (forgive me) sleazing over to FReeperland to see what brand(s) of crazy are currently being promoted. In their "homosexual agenda" category, there is a thread entitled "Victory For Christian Registrar Who Refused To Carry Out Gay ‘Weddings’." I had to read the following excerpt a couple of times to be sure I wasn't hallucinating:

So the Left (i.e., Satan) has been waging war on fatherhood, first of all. Women’s Suffrage was a huge step in that direction. Women’s Suffrage implies that families do not exist—the only political reality is the State and the individual. Denying women the vote is a recognition that the family is a reality PRIOR to the State, and that the father has the function of speaking for his family in the public square.

Only married men with children should be allowed to vote. The explosion of Socialism has been concurrent with the dissolution of the idea of the family, followed by the dissolution of actual families. Women who do not have a reliable husband “marry the government.”

:wtf:

[KitchenWitch]

1. I think your sigpic has the answer to that one!

:wtf:

[SacredCow]

3. I think this is out of even St. Dogbert's league..... n/t

[BulletproofLandshark]

2. "Only married men with children should be allowed to vote"

All this dolt had to do was add "white landowner" to that and he'd would've fit right in in the early 18th century.

[SacredCow]

4. The "with children" caveat is just bizarre....

somehow, your sperm count is a factor of whether you can vote? :shrug:

[KitchenWitch]

5. Wonder if that would count for sperm donors...

[SacredCow]

6. Or if the children weren't actually his....

I know better than to go there- even for entertainment purposes... :spank: