T Roosevelt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 07:13 PM
Original message |
Looking for a good Linux text editor |
|
I have Textpad for Windows and love it, but I haven't configured Wine yet, so that's out. Any recommendations?
|
lcordero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 07:17 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I've never had a problem with Vi, nano, gedit or pico |
gold_bug
(485 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 07:20 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I was using nedit the other day, |
|
it's a nice little editor. But I don't use Unix very often so I just try to find the most basic editor available -- I'm not really sure what else there is. I use pico at the CLI because I'm too lazy to learn vi or emacs.
|
benburch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 07:21 PM
Response to Original message |
jmowreader
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 07:21 PM
Response to Original message |
Xithras
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 07:22 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Dunno why, I know that there are many better CLI text editors out there, but I somehow got started using Pico and just never stopped.
|
theorist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 07:39 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I use "emacs" almost exclusively, but occasionally "ed" |
|
for editing single lines at a time. "ed" is ancient, and not very user friendly, but the stream editor "sed" that spawned off of it is incredibly powerful for dealing with large files.
|
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 07:47 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I use vi almost all the time, but I'm a mutant geek from Hell. |
|
Humans might be more comfy with mcedit (part of the Midnight Commander package).
|
Ellen Forradalom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 07:53 PM
Original message |
|
but then a vi enthusiast taught me early in my computing career--and I've been a vi user ever since.
|
theorist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Does that mean you have written your own shells and can |
|
program in assembly? I like the avatar, by the way.
|
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
Edited on Sun Feb-22-04 08:05 PM by JCCyC
Why would I write my own shell when there's the totally kickass bash? And yes, I do have huge assembly language experience. (up to the 386/486 level, no MMX or 3DNow! or other recent fancies)
On edit: my avatar is GPL. Feel free to leech it.
|
Mike Niendorff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 08:03 PM
Response to Original message |
|
For straight text, there's no beating Xemacs (imho). But if you're looking for general word-processing, you might also want to check out Abiword.
MDN
|
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. I don't think any of the mentioned editors has any bigotry coded in. |
|
They'd be probably equally good at editing gay text. (Sorry, couldn't resist. The devil made me do it. :evilgrin:)
|
theorist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
So did T Roosevelt find this thread useful?
|
PaveThePlanet
(30 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-22-04 08:57 PM
Response to Original message |
|
a lot of my über-geek (I haven't achieved that level yet) friends like 'vi' but it's too involved for me
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 05:21 PM
Response to Original message |