Rabrrrrrr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-30-08 06:37 PM
Original message |
Question about 83j-bit computing |
|
Yeah, I know, some of you are thinking "83j"? Yeah, as a true geek I only deal with unreal amounts of bits. Only simpering momma's boys and wusses use real numbers of bits, and especially only they use them in powers of 2.
It's all about the primes, baby. The primes. 32-bit? 64-bit? Please. Give me my bits in groups of 97 or 701 or 79.
And yeah, some of you silly loafoffs who only studied math and not the purity of application might be thinking, "j?" Of course, as a EE I use the more appropriate and correct "j", instead of the infantile and bogus "i" that the lessers use.
And, well, now I've forgotten what my question was, but it was probably beyond your comprehension anyway.
|
Rabrrrrrr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-31-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I'm kicking this because... |
|
well, because I have an inflated ego, and I think this was pretty fucking funny.
|
ZombieNixon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-31-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-31-08 04:06 PM by ZombieNixon
:thumbsup:
|
Rabrrrrrr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-31-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. That's e^(PI)j, Philistine. |
ZombieNixon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-31-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Fuck your j, Phjljstjne |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-31-08 04:23 PM by ZombieNixon
:P
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 10:48 AM
Response to Original message |