Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Footnotes or Endnotes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 07:50 PM
Original message
Poll question: Footnotes or Endnotes
If you had to chose only one:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excessive footnotes make the page format weirder.
Endnotes are just so much neater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Endnotes require a disruption in reading.
You have to mark your place, find the end note and hope that they aren't by chapter because then you have to find the chapter then the endnote, read the endnote, then find your place in the text again and resume reading.

Footnotes simply require that you keep your place, glance down to read, then glance back up to resume reading the main text.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's assuming you want to read them.
Often they're just citations--useful in certain contexts, but not continually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. They're better for citations than parenthetical citations and endnotes.
All the information you could ever want or need is right there on the page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh gawd ...
Edited on Thu Nov-13-08 08:20 PM by RoyGBiv
I just had a horrible flashback.

One of the history lists to which I subscribed actually devolved into something near a flame war over this issue. It was insane.

(I prefer footnotes, but I'm saying that very, very quietly in case any of the people from that list are lurking and see me.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Footnotes for remarks, endnotes for citations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. Footnotes are better. Endnotes suck but they're easier for editors.
The best system I ever saw was Jaraslav Pelikan's margin notes in his History of Christianity.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0226653757/ref=sib_dp_pt#reader-link

take a look at pages 9-14 and tell me that is not a beautiful system that allows for smooth reading, yet still allows the reader to check on what is informing him to say what he's saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. They're ok. I prefer the margins empty so there's space to write if necessary.
Margin notes can go to far--like when they simply say

"It is impossible to separate a cube into two cubes, or a fourth power into two fourth powers, or in general, any power higher than the second into two like powers. I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of this, which this margin is too narrow to contain."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Use the other margin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elshiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. I can't choose one. When I write I prefer endnotes, but when I read
I prefer footnotes. The teacher always said write 5-6 pages on this topic and I always thought it was "cheating" to put footnotes, takes up too much of the page. If I'm reading, I like to look at the bottom of the page for the notes instead of flipping to the back or the end of the chapter to read the notes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. Neither - say what you need to say in the text. If it's not important to
be in the body of the text, then you're just going off on a tangent. Focus your writing, cite your sources with a simple (author,date) and a literature cited section, and be done with it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ghostsofgiants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
12. If it's a short essay, endnotes. If it's a book or longer essay, footnotes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC