Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

*STAR TREK (2009) TRAILER OUT NOW*

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
charlie and algernon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:45 PM
Original message
*STAR TREK (2009) TRAILER OUT NOW*
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7b_0WAbBVs

Looks awsome, can't wait to see it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. legit version is up too
http://www.startrekmovie.com/

Unfortunately everyone on the internet is trying to view it so good luck. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. I can't believe they're waiting till May to release
I'm not a fanboy Trekker by any means, but that's just mean to the people who are. Clearly it's just about done.

Guess they have to get all the toy enterprises built
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Was due to be out this year; who lost confidence and moved it forward?
Not to mention, who is the target audience; people who hated Kirk and/or William Shatner? (No wonder he's not making a cameo; the trailer adding something to make an inference with...)

A fan of Kirk's era myself, Kirk usually broke the prime directive to help other societies and not to be a pompous donkey rump.

Okay, yes, he bonked or it was insinuated but that's not important right now.

The trailer starts with a boy who has driven a convertible over a cliff (:wtf:) -- he later drives by the Enterprise being built.

Once again: :wtf:

23rd century and they drive convertibles and here's Kirk being a rebellious twerp by plunging one over...

One heck of a reboot.

Is the new Kirk based on the original Kirk, or a loose inference of a certain actor who played Kirk at one time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Can anyone explain why we have to wait six months to see this movie?
The wait ain't over yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think they thought they'd have better box office as a summer blockbuster v. Christmastime
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. That's probably it, unless there's been script problems
speaking as someone who has worked in film, there's usually only two reasons for long delays like this: A). Marketing strategies; the coveted 16-35 yo male demographic spends more on movies over the summer, so that would be the ideal release date, or B). The completed film had shaky scores with test audiences, sending it back into script rewrites and production. This happens more often than many people think!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. They did the same thing with Harry Potter 6
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. OMG!!! HOLY FUCK! HOLY FUCK!
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think it looks like shit.
I hope I'm not the only one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrownPrinceBandar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Nope. Looks like you are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Nope. I saw the trailer in the theater and I don't know where to end in wondering what it's about,
and for whom is the target audience.

Not to mention, just showing Kirk like that means it's either a reboot of the Kirk era in a new vision or the writers don't know jack **** about Kirk's motives and instead are using some news articles involving William Shatner and his known ego in lieu of Kirk.

The original series has Kirk violating the chain of command when it helped civilizations, or even to get Spock back. Talk about crimes against humanity (not!). That trailer is the typical cynical lame-buttocks-for-brains approach to modern film making. Trek is supposed to be optimistic, amongst other things. Not self-aggrandizing recklessness, though I won't deny Kirk had a lot of jiggy and they already explored the result of one of his sexual escapades by giving him a son in "Star Trek II" (1982) and that was well handled.

And I hope my interpretation of that trailer is wrong, in which case I'll retract my unspoken expletive, but even I am seeing something of a pattern in modern day media and I don't like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I'm reminded of Armageddeon.
For some reason modern blockbuster writers feel the complusion to put their hero in a fancy sports car and have him tear ass through the desert. Nevermind that it's a movie about spaceships.

I think they tried the same thing with Picard driving an SUV through the desert in one of the recent movies. I don' t know, I've stopped watching them.

"Trek is supposed to be optimistic"

I keep hearing that, but I don't know where it comes from. Star Trek was always a cheap rip-off of Forbidden Planet. A flying saucer and it's earthman crew lands on a new planet, experiences some problem, maybe an interesting sci-fi concept, usually a sci-fi cliche, then flies off to a new planet next week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. there are worse things than ripping off Forbidden Planet...
which is a rip-off of The Tempest, which is a rip-off of ___________



:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Oh it's a great concept for a TV series.
New planet every week. Works great.

But I think this two hours of teenagers fist fighting in space might be missing the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. kid sez, "How many explosions does it have?"

:rofl:


It did kind of have that look, eh? That was the problem with Enterprise, after a while.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. The first few notes of the main theme...
...still gives me goosebumps!






/geek I am
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. The first trailer gets me all goosebumpy with the theme and Nimoy doing "space, the final frontier"
I get all verklempt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I had to look that one up1
:D


"verklempt" says it quite well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. I am not sure I can care.....Because....
I got hooked on "Enterprise" and I recall that Paramount did not treat the actors or producers well. They made a real effort on that and them like dirt. IT was an awful way to end that series...Bad taste in my mouth..Doesn't mean much anymore..sorry..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
17. interesting - but the actor's faces seem to lack, well, character
I'll go anyway and give it a chance... gotta appease the Trek addiction.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
19. i saw that trailer on Saturday before Bond, i'm looking forward to seeing the movie
and like the new Bond film i won't be reading any reviews before i see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
21. Two concerns.
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 07:30 PM by MilesColtrane
The bridge of the Enterprise is too white and shiny.
It looks like an Apple™ store fer chrissakes.


There better be a damned good reason for Spock physically attacking Kirk on the bridge.
I hope Abrams isn't just going to chalk it up to Spock's youthful exuberance, cause Vulcans don't roll like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Well, now we know one of the movie's sponsors...
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 07:15 PM by HypnoToad
They have to find product placement somehow... :D

Of course, Kirk and/or Spock might have their minds taken over by alien entities... (and how many times did the original show already do that? Quite a few...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Yeah, I can just see Kirk taking his first tour of the Enterprise...
Edited on Mon Nov-17-08 07:32 PM by MilesColtrane
..from stem to stern, ending up on the bridge.

At the end, Steve Jobs the sixth steps out of the turbolift in a black turtleneck and says, "Oh, and there's just one more thing...".

Re:Bridge Fight

Maybe Spock is in Pon Far and he's jealous because Kirk is banging Uhura?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie and algernon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-17-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I noticed that too, about the look of the bridge
Looks too "Modern" when you consider the original bridge. Unless we're supposed to believe that the bridge as been worn down by the time Kirk gets to the Shatner age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC