Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Recession Strikes Deep - Rich Cutting Back on payments to mistresses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 11:52 AM
Original message
Recession Strikes Deep - Rich Cutting Back on payments to mistresses
I thought this would get more response after I posted it in GD, but I guess too many people are still worked up over Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder and Joe Lieberman…
But, I thought this was funny that somebody would actually publish their findings on this – welcome to the new Wall Street Journal of Rupert Murdoch. I guess this was too good for the NY Post? It was not from the Onion.

November 18, 2008, 11:20 am
Rich Cut Back on Payments to Mistresses

You know times are tough when the rich start cutting costs on their mistresses.

According to a new survey by Prince & Assoc., more than 80% of multimillionaires who had extra-marital lovers planned to cut back on their gifts and allowances. Still, only 12% of the multimillionaire cheaters said they plan to give up on their lovers altogether for financial reasons.

Rich people are getting hit, and they’re all expressing the need to curtail unnecessary spending,” said Russ Alan Prince, president of Prince & Assoc., a wealth-research firm based in Connecticut. “Lovers are part of the same calculation.”

Of course, any study of millionaires and their mistresses should be taken with a large grain of salt. The survey–a subset of a larger wealth study–polled 191 individuals with a minimum net worth of $20 million who said they had lovers of at least a year or more (this to screen out the one-night stands, etc.). About two thirds of the respondents were men and one third women. All were married and all had personal control over their finances, meaning the women and men surveyed were the primary wealth holders in their homes.

http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2008/11/18/rich-cut-back-on-payments-to-mistresses/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC