Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should the Yankees forfeit the Campaigns they won with Sherman?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 01:07 PM
Original message
Should the Yankees forfeit the Campaigns they won with Sherman?
Discuss...:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EastTennesseeDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. He was every bit as racist as any Confederate
so, sometimes I kind of wish...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Interesting.
I knew he was a bastard, but I didn't know he was a racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EastTennesseeDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Research "Ebenezer Creek" eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Will do...
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. He was about as racist as any northerner, too. Actually, he was probably better
than many. He was viewed by freed slaves on his march to Savannah as a conquering hero, and many followed him--something he tried to discourage. In Atlanta he met with a number of black leaders and decided to hand out land and equipment he had confiscated--the origins of "forty acres and a mule"--but Johnson later overturned his grants. One of the black leaders at the meeting commented that Sherman treated the freed slaves with courtesy at least equal to that he showed Stanton and the others from Washington.

Sherman gets labeled a racist for two main issues. First, he mishandled the many freed slaves following him (some even blame him for Johnson's reversal of his land grants), and second, he was opposed to freed slaves becoming troops in his army, even though the government had encouraged this. Both are taken somewhat out of context--Sherman's problem with the freed slaves was that he could not support them, and constantly encouraged them to stop following him (though they had no idea what else to do). His opposition to slaves in his army was was because he didn't want them to have to fight. He made some famous comment that Southerners were claiming the North couldn't defeat them except by fomenting rebellion amongst the slaves, and he wanted to prove them wrong.

He certainly felt, as most white people then (and many now) felt, that blacks were inferior to whites, but he did not seem to have an adverserial racism towards them. He was more paternalistic.

As for Ebenezer Creek, that was the result of one of his officers, Jefferson Davis (not THE JD). It was his plan, and his aggressive racism, that caused the slaughter.

Sherman also fought the Indians in the rest of his career, and was horribly brutal towards them, but that was more because of his attitudes towards war than towards Native Americans. At the same time, he was critical of America's treatment of Native Americans, especially on reservations. He once wrote in a letter to Savannah in response to them asking for leniency that he didn't start the war, and that the only way he saw to end the war was to make it so brutal that those who did start it wanted to stop it. After that, he said, he would be happy to dine with them, and would be their fiercest protector. That was his mentality in a nutshell. His actions were inspired by his attitude towards war, I believe, more than by racism.

And for the record I'm a Southerner and hate the bloody bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Can you un-rape the raped?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Absolutely not.
This was just a lame attempt at a copy cat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC