NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-20-09 09:25 AM
Original message |
Cool movie triology meter |
motely36
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-20-09 09:29 AM
Response to Original message |
1. It's just not worth making the third movie... |
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-20-09 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. There were a surprising number of franchises that jumped the shark with the |
|
third attempt. Still there seems to be an equal number where the quality held strong on the third attempt, such as Star Wars, LTR and Indiana Jones.
|
Tommy_Carcetti
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-20-09 10:18 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Of course, most of these are not true trilogies anymore. |
|
Godfather, Lord of the Rings, Matrix, Back to the Future, and a couple of others count as trilogies with an actual beginning and an end. Star Trek, Rocky, Alien, Rambo and those who extend beyond three films do not. And Star Wars is iffy. It's a true trilogy if you count the three original films and the story ark, but then you have to figure in the three crappy prequels.
And how are we judging Batman? By the films of the 90s? 00s? Were there Batman movies made in the 60s, or was it just the TV show?
|
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-20-09 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. There was one Batman movie made in the 60s |
|
Although there may have been even older serial movies, I am not sure. The one in the 60s was with the same cast and was along the same lines as the hilarious TV show.
|
3.14158675309
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-20-09 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Good point. A "trilogy" isn't just three random movies with the same cast. |
insanity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-20-09 11:18 AM
Response to Original message |
6. The second Indiana Jones was way worse than the third |
|
And in the fourth, the filmmakers raped Indiana Jones.
|
Blue_Tires
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-20-09 11:21 AM
Response to Original message |
7. for the most part, i'd have to agree with the graph |
|
Edited on Fri Feb-20-09 11:21 AM by Blue_Tires
i wonder what a 'police academy' one would look like?
|
DarkTirade
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-20-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message |
8. They're all good except for the Die Hard one... |
|
I'm sorry, Die Hard 2 was a classic example of a shitty 80s sequel that was only made because the original made money. However, since it was still entertaining despite that, so I'd put it down somewhere around the halfway mark.
|
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-20-09 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. I agree, I thought that was the one that I didn't agree with either |
|
DH 2 was nothing but a pale copy of the origninal. The series didn't pick itself up again, until the 3rd one (with the 4th one being pretty good as well, even if the premise was far fetched).
|
arcadian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-20-09 11:57 AM
Response to Original message |
10. I'm going to disagree with the Jurassic Park assessment |
|
I think the third movie was actually the best.
|
OwnedByFerrets
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-20-09 12:45 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Only a couple of these that I completely agree with. |
|
Movie's are such a personal experience that everyone is going to have a different opinion.
|
gatorboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-20-09 12:54 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Die Hard 2 & 3 rate that high? Really? |
|
Has anyone seen these films lately?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:54 AM
Response to Original message |