Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Okay, so I just finally got around to watching Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
DarkTirade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 08:50 PM
Original message
Okay, so I just finally got around to watching Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull...
... and I really don't see what everyone was complaining about. No, it wasn't Lost Crusade or Raiders. It couldn't be. It's been about 20 years since then. The whole point of the Indiana Jones movies was to make an adventure movie that was a modern movie, but set in a different zeitgeist. In the originals, that was the WWII era. It's been 20 years. The new era has a different feel to it. Indy's gained 20 years, he's still the same guy but he's changed with the time. My only real complaint was the vine-swinging scene. (and those who've seen the movie know what I'm talking about.) Well, that and the fact that the trailer pretty much spoiled the entire first 10 minutes of the movie.

The treasure/villains? Yes they were different. But they fit the time and place. Some of the overdramatic moments, like the nuclear tests and the government commie witch hunts? Those were the fears of that era. Same with the treasure. It was beginning of the technology race between ourselves and the 'reds'. When Hitler was the bad guy, his obsession with the occult provided fodder for the first and third movies. Now that the obsession is getting a technological advantage over the enemy and dealing with the people outside our nice American way of life, the new fears and goals came into play.

As far as Mutt... well, I was pleasantly surprised. I was expecting the normal annoying spastic Shia LaBeouf character. Hell, I was expecting him to be this movie's Jar-Jar. But he wasn't. He was reigned in and let the character be the forefront and not himself. Not sure how much of that was directing and how much was himself, but whatever the cause, it worked.

The other complaint I've heard a lot are the various pratfalls. My response to that is... did you see the other three movies? Indy's schtick is that he's not perfect. He does screw up from time to time. What makes him the hero is that when that happens, he keeps going. I think the only reason it seemed more noticeable in this movie was A) nostalgia goggles. He was the hero 20 years ago so we forget his mistakes, and B) he's older and so any pratfalls he does now could be seen as poking at his age.

Honestly, I'd rate this one as being the third best out of the four movies. But I never was that big a fan of Temple of Doom. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hmm---I pretty much agree with you.
There were some things that were ridiculous (the refigrerator/bomb thing) but overall I thought it was an entertaining movie...Now, Orrex to come in and tell you and me how wrong we are in 3....2.....1....:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkTirade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, that was a bit silly.
Edited on Mon Feb-23-09 09:00 PM by DarkTirade
But no sillier than melting wax Nazis. :P

*edit* Actually I forgot that I was going to mention something about that... the only part with him in the fridge that I found REALLY ridiculous was the way it flew and bounced around. He woulda been pulverised in there. I can picture it withstanding the heat for a few brief seconds. I can picture it getting knocked over and flying a few feet. But the way it did... no. That did kinda jar you out of the fantasy for a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TK421 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. This movie sucked...sorry, but it was the biggest bore
I don't remember ever thinking to myself "Isn't this movie over yet"? but more especially when it comes to Indiana Jones. Temple of Doom was never a favorite of mine...Raiders was always my favorite. I also liked Last Crusade, though the whole Sean Connery aspect put a different, almost mushy spin on Indianas character. KOTCS seemed like it was rushed when they put it together, and certain parts were so......god-damn BORING!! Fuck! Indiana Jones movies are not supposed to be boring!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkTirade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I agree that it didn't have the flair of the original,
but I wouldn't call it boring. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kinda agree with you.
But my better judgment tells me that the movie was just god awful. But I will watch it again and I like pretty much all sci-fi no matter how awful and sucky, it's my MST3K syndrome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkTirade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. I wouldn't even really look at it as sci-fi, just an escapist adventure movie
that happens to revolve around one major sci-fi plot point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. i hated it, the moment i saw Shia LaBeouf in the Wild one outfit it was all over for me.
then it was just hilarious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkTirade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. That was my initial reaction.
But I think it was to show that he's a young guy trying a little too hard to be a big tough man. And not succeeding.

So if that is what they were going for, it totally worked. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost in CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Aliens? Aliens???? ALIENS?????
Sorry I can excuse the fridge and the CGI groundhogs... but the movie sank around the Tarzan sequence and the end simply could not have been stupider if they had tried.

Plus was it me or did Karen Allen look like she was on Quaaludes throughout the entire film?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkTirade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. As opposed to an ancient relic that melts people's faces off, or a guy who can use magic to reach
into your chest and pull your heart out? I don't see how aliens is really that big a difference there. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost in CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. At least those are based on "true" stories.
If the Ark of the Covenant showed up in Star Wars I would be just as perterbed... (Not that the prequels weren't perturbing enough.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkTirade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Aliens and Area 51 are embedded into our culture now just as those things are.
They're just a little closer to the surface. More recent. While I was a bit surprised that that's the way they chose to go, I'm not surprised that they tried something different. And they went for something that, like I said, fit the time the movie was set fairly well. I certainly don't think this movie lived up to the legacy of Raiders or Last Crusade, but neither do I think it was as horrible as people are saying it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redneck Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Meh, it was pretty bad.
It started off dumb and went down hill from there. Maybe my expectations were too high (probably) but the fridge scene killed the entire movie for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. i totally agree, my mistake was in looking forward to it.
after seeing that movie i have been way too hard on Alien 3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkTirade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Maybe that's why I enjoyed it... my expectations were low, so the movie exceeded them.
Edited on Mon Feb-23-09 11:35 PM by DarkTirade
Unlike Star Wars Episode I... my expectations were low, and it still didn't exceed them...

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sammythecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Likewise
If someone hadn't sorta pushed it on me I probably wouldn't have seen it. It was much better than I expected. Not great, or memorable really, but it was an entertaining way to while away a couple of hours, to say the least.

Nice synopsis/critique/review/analysis you gave up top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lethe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
16. the fridge thing was just too much for me
i didn't like the cgi stuff either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
18. I saw it with a bunch of physics friends. (mild spoilers)
As such, surviving a nuke in a fridge and "magic aliens did it" as the only rational explanation added to our enjoyment rather than detracted from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
19. not sure it deserved a razzie, although the plot was a bit over the top
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
20. The consensus is that they made a weak, silly movie.
They didn't have to do that--no matter that it's been a couple of decades. Good writers and a good director could have made a movie as exciting (or more) as the earlier installments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
21. I thought it was a great popcorn movie...
I thought it was a great popcorn movie. Much better than numbers two or three (but nothing can hold a candle to number one). Fast, campy, cheesy fun-- that's what I wanted from the the movie and that's exactly what I got from the movie.



Good stuff!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strong Atheist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
22. The biggest flaw in the movie was
that the skull was taken a long time ago. Why hadn't the aliens left then, when they were whole? They leave as soon as the skull is back...

And how did it get stolen in the first place? Indy had to activate that sand/temple thingy, it was not already open...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
23. Indy movies were just highbudget Saturday afternoon serials
as Spielburg said at the time. Just like Star Wars is simply a western in space.


:shrug:

We have had the new Indy movie for a while (netflix) just haven't gotten around to watching it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC