RIP >0

[CreekDog]

:shrug:

[TK421]

1. hmmmm?

what do you mean?

[Amerigo Vespucci]

2. Try rec-ing or un-recing a thread in The Lounge and see what happens

The admins killed it but haven;t finished clean-up detail.

[ghostsofgiants]

3. Another failed DU experiment.

Tragic.

[Amerigo Vespucci]

4. "unrec" = "New Coke"

:rofl:

[madinmaryland]

5. Maybe they wanted to get rid of the "+1" and "44-6". Just sayin.

[Symarip]

6. You'll always be >0 to me

We have memories. Le sigh.

[Bucky]

7. I want to both Recommend and Unrecommend this thread. Yes, all three.

"Iyai, wanna rock'n'roll all nigh-ight, and party ev-er-y day! Hey!"

[cwydro]

8. I thought Skinner said they were keeping it?

Did they just remove it in the Lounge?

[Strong Atheist]

9. Yes, but much more importantly, they removed

<0!!!!!!!!


:party:

:toast:

:bounce:

:woohoo:

:applause:

[cwydro]

10. Oh! OK.

Well, that was probably a good decision.:hi:

[Strong Atheist]

11. I think so...

:hi:

[TheMightyFavog]

12. And now a musical tribute...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IH0-DCA5uJg

[hunter]

13. I was hoping we could vote to tombstone and untombstone people.

Anarchy and mob rule! It would be great!!!

What we actually need is a scarlet A avatar. People with who consistently received more unrecommendes than recommends would automatically be assigned the scarlet letter, and their posts would get a -1 font size and the font color would fade a little closer to background. People who got twice as many unrecommends as recommends would get a -2 font size and a more faded font, etc., etc. until posters people consistently unrecommended would fade away entirely..

[Deja Q]

14. Uh, that's, in all probability, WHY they were banned to begin with...

:rofl: