Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did the music make "Blade Runner"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
UndertheOcean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 12:09 AM
Original message
Did the music make "Blade Runner"?
I think , without the music we won't be hearing about the movie today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. I like the music - but I've heard people say it dates the movie...
To me, the sets are what makes the movie.

They still can't quite match models withthe CGI (but they are getting close)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. The music does very little for me. It's too Chariots of Fire IMO
And it definitely dates the film, as much as Rachael's prodigious shoulder pads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. I barely remember it ...

So, I guess "no" for me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Deckard is a Replicant.
And Roy Batty is the hero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorax7844 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think the awesome story, acting, script, sets, and music make the movie
Roy's scene at the end is one of the deepest scenes in movie history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. I heard he ad-libbed the "Tears in rain" speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. It's a gesamtkuntzwerk
Just about everything in it is perfect for the story that the movie tells.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. No need to use profanity
And I don't accept that everything in the film is perfect, not even for the story it tells.


It's still damn good, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. It's my favorite movie of all time
Sorry about the swearing. I'm too lazy to Google gesamtkunstwerk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. Deckard is not a Replicant.
But Roy Batty is the hero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. Of Course it did
Edited on Fri Jul-17-09 09:50 AM by CBGLuthier
And so did the voice over dialog, screw you Ridley Scott.

But, I am a major Vangelis (and other electronic music) fan so I may be biased. The love theme is a timeless classic and the end title music is a personal favorite.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9KAqhbIZ7o

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAwo7DPUFUM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Ugh! The voiceover was terrible!
I understand that it was an homage to noir voiceovers, but that's no excuse. It served no purpose but to give information that was either irrelevant or redundant.

Scott is wrong about many things, not least his mistaken belief that Deckard was a Replicant, but he was exactly right to remove the voiceover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Scott did NOT want the voiceover.
It was something the studio forced him to do- typical "dumb it down so the morons in the audience don't feel left out" bullshit.

Scott removed it for the Director's Cut.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Yes, I know, I don't care
I agree some of it, most of it even, was bullshit lame exposition, but I still like the semi=noir feeling it gave the movie.

I think there is a compromise version that would be superior with some of the voiceover, remove the happy ending and stop trying to prove Decker was really a replicant "all along."

I am not an adherent to the auter theory for directors. I believe film is a collaborative medium and writers deserve more credit than directors.

That said, some directors are "auters" for certain but I don't include Ridley Scott quite in that hallowed group. If he had made more intelligent, quality films like The Duelists I might feel differently about his work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. No, we would definitely still hear about it.
It's one of the most influential movies of the last 30 years, even sans music.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. Production Design killed the radio star
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
13. The music was secondary or thirday to the story.
IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
16. Are you forgetting how visually stunning that film was?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
19. I think that's pretty silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
20. vangelis did some GREAT movie scores...
Edited on Fri Jul-17-09 01:49 PM by dysfunctional press
'opera sauvage', used in 'the year of living dangerously' is still my favorite, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lethe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
21. the music was a huge part of the movie
vangelis's music is not really dateable.

i'm not really sure if i could have received the full impact of the movie without the music.

the people who are saying that the music dates the movie....thats pretty ridiculous. It was quite fantastic, and not at all trendy. It's in the same category as Tangerine Dream or Kraftwerk, it sounds as fresh and moving as it did back then.

The opening synthesizer sounds are nothing short of fantastic, it still gives me chills. Memories of Green is a modern masterpiece. How do you react when you realize you are not real?



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cg0cmhjdiLs

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC