Do people simply have mucho reading comprehension problems?

[raccoon]

Or do people just read the top line of a post, and respond immediately, regardless of what else is said in the post????


Aargh!

[PVnRT]

1. How dare you accuse me of stupidity!!

I will salt your fields and burn your village!

[MissMillie]

2. am I the offending party?

If I'm not, I could be....

[raccoon]

12. check your pm. nt

[unpossibles]

3. What's wrong with being macho, tough guy!?!? nt

[Inchworm]

4. Suck, squeeze, pop, poof

That's how I remember the cycle.

:silly:

[raccoon]

5. Inchy, that doesn't sound too nice. nt

[Inchworm]

6. It was just zaniness

on compression.

Intake, compression, ignition, exaust = the 4 cycles of a 4 cycle engine.

No clue why I remembered this after reading the word comprehension, but I did and I shared. :P

:hi:

[rug]

7. What's this about munchos? I like them.

[Taitertots]

8. How dare he insult munchos!

[rug]

11. I wonder what he really thinks about pretzels.

[TxRider]

9. Yes

[Captain Hilts]

10. Yes. They don't read the whole thing. I've done it too. nt

[leeroysphitz]

13. What?

[Tuesday Afternoon]

14. tldr

sheesh. hurry it up. will ya.

[appamado amata padam]

15. yes, and another problem (I think) is

Original posters misunderstanding, and taking criticism of points in an excerpted article, as being directed at themselves.

I was just accused of "not even reading the post," and when I responded with a quote from the post to support my position,

*crickets*.