|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 02:11 PM Original message |
Bummer, New Star Trek movie isn't going to be until June 2012 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tigereye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
1. what, so they can mess more with the canon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 05:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. You sound like Torquemada. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tigereye (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 11:33 AM Response to Reply #9 |
15. he he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 06:04 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. No one messed with the canon more than Gene Roddenberry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. This is way too long |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
3. I bet they ruin it by doing a 2012 tie in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
4. It's strategically important to give the audience more time to forget what Star Trek used to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AsahinaKimi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 04:33 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. If It wasn't for Youtube |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gidney N Cloyd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
5. Whew. I might actually have finished watching the first one by then, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katkat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
6. I couldn't bring myself to watch the first one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
7. Goddammit. All the actors will be way too old by then! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rebel with a cause (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 07:23 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Wow. A whole two years older!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire Walk With Me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 05:20 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Gah! It'll be Star Trek 5 all over again! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Initech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 07:37 PM Response to Original message |
12. Will they get Shatner in for a cameo this time around? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bikebloke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
13. Will the DVD be released before the end of the world? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dr. Strange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 11:52 PM Response to Original message |
14. In this movie... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
16. Better than having it suck big, bumpy rocks because they rushed it, I guess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 06:23 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. I love the reboot too, watch it at least once a week, big fun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-11-10 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
17. Who will Kirk and crew summarily execute this time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:05 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC