Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oh nos! Sal's out of Mad Men for good!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 07:07 PM
Original message
Oh nos! Sal's out of Mad Men for good!
He was one of the most interesting characters. Gripe gripe gripe. I was totally waiting for them to restart his story line all last season and was assuming they'd bring him back this season somehow.

Sal Leaving 'Mad Men': Bryan Batt Out Of Work

Don Draper unceremoniously fired Salvatore Romano when a spurned gay client tried to out him towards the end of last season, and now it looks we won't see any more of Sal as AMC has failed to renew Bryan Batt's contract for Season 4.

Creator Matthew Weiner told TV Guide that ousting Batt "was a tough moment for the show, but that's where we are. I know how people felt about Bryan. I obviously love working with him, and he has been an indelible character since the pilot. But I felt it was an expression of the times that he couldn't work there anymore. It's the ultimate case of sexual harassment."

Batt said that, despite his character's unemployability at Sterling Cooper, he didn't know he was being let go. "I was supposed to be notified by December 31, and nothing," he told the magazine. In the fall after Sal's firing he implored fans to start a Facebook group to keep him on. It doesn't look like they listened.


Geeze, they're making it sound like they were forced to write him out of the show. First off, Sal wasn't fired for being gay; he was fired because a powerful client spazzed out on him. This was a story line they chose to insert. There's a LOT more story to be told with this character--how a closeted gay man reacts to the changes in the mid 60s--not just Stonewall, but how Kitty his wife might react to the Feminine Mystique or how he'd handle becoming a father. Sal, unlike that British guy or the nerdy TV guy or that fucking annoying teacher Don was bonking, was actually an interesting character.

But furthermore, Sal's an artist. The new firm is still in marketing. If they wanted to continue the character, there's no reason at all they couldn't show him working with Cooper Sterling Draper and Britishguy as a freelancer. There might even be intriguing plot points in Sal sneaking in and out of the office with his sketches when the creepy tobacco client is there. Or how other characters treat him if they ever find out his secret. There's an interesting story to tell with Sal.

If they have a problem with Bryan Batt, I could understand. But they're not saying that. It's a lame argument that "we have to let him go cause folks in the 60s were just so anti-gay." Sorry, no, in 1963 being "antigay" meant you opposed happiness. All sorts of men hid their secret lives then--which is only the central theme to the entire Mad Men series. Sal rounded out that theme in the show, to the limited extent that they gave Bryan Batt air time. He played his role brilliantly, kept Sal from being either a joke or a neurotic shell as a lesser talent might've done. He's a great actor. His loss is the show's loss and the viewers'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sucks!
That was one of the best storylines! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. jeez, when he was fired in the first place I figured they were going to move towards Don starting
his own firm and that this would be how they would bring Sal back. I was right about Don getting his own firm, but I guess I was wrong about him bring Sal back on. I think that's a huge mistake on their part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pink-o Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. 2 hours ago, I was just wondering about him...
then I read your thread. Synchonistic again!

Anyway, I don't like the answer to my musings. I'm with you, I think dealing with being gay in those times is just as important as showing the ethnic and gender prejudices of the time. Plus Sal was tortured and vulnerable, a deep character.

Mistake to let him go and allow that storyline to die. Especially since I think Betty Draper is a pain in the ass (and I'm a chick!) and I wouldn't object to less screen time for her if Sal could have more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Aw, that sucks!
they could've played that storyline well. Big loss. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. They can't bring him back because of 'Lucky Strike'---
No way he works at the new firm because he pissed off the head guy's son at Lucky strike---he refused to be raped by him.

He was fired for not taking one for the team, quietly and satisfying the all-powerful client. Remember how Don kept Barret and Utz quiet? Why couldn't Sal do the same, was Don's question...

Sad, and wrong. I will miss Sal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuelahWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. Crap! One of the characters I wanted to come back!
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC