Mike 03
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 06:40 PM
Original message |
Inspired by other recent posts here: Who is the Most Over-Rated Director? |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-06-10 06:40 PM by Mike 03
I credit others in the Lounge for raising this topic, but I think it is quite interesting.
In your opinion, which movie director(s) are taken way more seriously than they deserve?
|
MilesColtrane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 06:47 PM
Response to Original message |
|
M. Night Shamalamadingdong
George Lucas
|
Mike 03
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. My God, I sure agree with you about M. Night Shalaman. |
|
That is a brilliant selection. SIGNS sucked, and so did THE VILLAGE, and so did LADY IN THE WATER and THE HAPPENING.
Massively good pick!!
|
GCP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
16. M. Knight and Taratino |
|
Both horribly over-rated IMHO
|
nuxvomica
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
9. I thought Sixth Sense was brilliant |
|
But The Village, Signs, and The Happening were complete letdowns. I'm mixed on Lady in the Water and Unbreakable.
|
Zomby Woof
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-07-10 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
29. I can't stand that prick Shystermyalan or whatever his name is |
|
I figured out 'The Sixth Sense' very early in the movie, which made it duller than it already was - and really, should a director hinge all of his movies on a gimmick? I wasn't even trying, because I didn't even know there was a 'hook'.
He's a pompous asshole, which just adds to my contempt for his work.
|
Fire Walk With Me
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 06:54 PM
Response to Original message |
Mike 03
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Cameron fascinates me, but I have heard that AVATAR is not all that great. But since |
|
I have not seen it, I am in position to judge it.
|
MilesColtrane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. It's great to look at, but take away the tech and it sucks. |
Mike 03
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
13. I believe you 100%, and it matches up with everything I have heard. NT |
Fire Walk With Me
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-07-10 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
35. I saw the last half and I agree with Miles as well. |
|
Extremely good-looking, but smaller, warmer films with the same theme blow it away (Local Hero, Princess Mononoke, etc.)
If he helps a generation to be conservation activists, then it's well worth the memory it takes up in digital storage, so I'll give him that. I wish that "The Last Mimzy" had had the same attention and success, for the same reasons (although it is more of a child's film).
|
Orrex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
23. In the past 15 years or so he's made several FANTASTIC half-hour movies |
|
Unfortunately, he's stretched each and every one of them past the two-hour mark.
|
progressoid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-08-10 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
41. It's interesting that Katherine Bigelow mentioned collaboration being in important part of film maki... |
|
Conversely, Cameron has to have it his way or no way.
He's an egotistical dick.
|
Auggie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-08-10 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
47. I think Cameron is a pretty good director |
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-08-10 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
49. Cameron has been overrated since Titanic |
Xipe Totec
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 06:57 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Daniel Myrick - Blair Witch Project nt |
Mike 03
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. One of my fondest recollections is watching BLAIR WITCH with my mother and we were laughing |
nuxvomica
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 07:02 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Here is my evidence:
Forrest Gump What Lies Beneath Polar Express Contact Death Becomes Her
Exculpatory evidence (just to be fair):
Who Framed Roger Rabbit? Used Cars Castaway
And a shout-out to Kenneth Branagh for such overblown crap as Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and Dead Again.
|
begin_within
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
"Contact" is brilliant filmmaking.
|
nuxvomica
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
14. I thought the acting and writing where terrible |
|
The special effects were awesome, though.
|
begin_within
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
there was no chemistry whatsoever between Jodie Foster and Matthew McConaughey, and that the cast never really coalesced. The script was, of course, a condensed version of the book, and as usual, a lot was lost when going from book to screenplay. But as far as directing, photography, effects, editing, sound - I believe it outclassed 'Titanic' which came out in the same year.
|
nuxvomica
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
19. Alright then, that's something we can agree on |
|
Frankly I never got all the way through Titanic. And Contact gets points for the interesting way things finally played out in that story.
|
cemaphonic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-07-10 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
27. He gets a pass for Back to the Future too |
REP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 07:08 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Manipulative dreck. Well, I liked Jaws. And Duel.
|
Mike 03
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. WOW, I anticipated most every name on this thread so far, but never Spielberg. |
|
Edited on Sat Mar-06-10 07:14 PM by Mike 03
But maybe I need a slap in the head. I love his work, but I am open to having my mind changed if there are good arguments in defiance of the talent of his work.
|
pink-o
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
15. His most commercial movies are surely manipulative. |
|
And the last bit in Schindler's List where he has them going by the cemetery with their characters from the film almost wrecked it for me.
But I thought "Munich" was brilliant and totally underrated. Should've won against "Crash" that's for sure. And I usually like Paul Haggis, but that one bit of his directing is totally overrated!
|
Mike 03
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
17. I LOVED MUNICH, I agree with you about SCHINDLER'S LIST. |
|
I think MUNICH deserved the Academy Award that year, way more than CRASH (or whatever other movie it lost to).
Also, I loved AI and MINORITY REPORT.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I do admit, I like many of his films, but I agree also that he has made some blunders, like THE COLOR PURPLE.
|
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-07-10 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
Correct, you are wrong. If that wasn't the absolute worst premise for a movie of all time, then I'd hate to see something worse. Regardless of how the boy comes into the house (and the contrived nature of that set-up was just wretched), nobody would ask that monster in. Yeah, it's cute how he's eight years old and all when you take him in when you're 32. But when you're 40, he's still . . . eight years old. When you're 50, he's, uh, eight. Never progresses past third grade. Never hits puberty. Never matures. Never does anything but exists as an eight year old. You're 64 and you've just barked your shin on the coffee table, hopping toward to bathroom to get some ibuprofen, and here's litte Marblehead with drawing number 8,759 in a never-ending series of drawings of "Mommy and Me." Get out of the way, you little shit!
Spielberg took this over from Stanley Kubrick, a project that Kubrick had kicked around for years before he died. My guess is that Kubrick didn't have any idea how to get into or out of the set-up, which is why the story never got done. Spielberg took it on, and should have just burned the footage and moved on to something else of a more enduring quality. Say a remake of "1941" with an all gerbil cast.
|
edbermac
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-08-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #26 |
38. A.I. is pretty interesting. |
REP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
22. He's too busy telling the audience what they should be feeling, instead of doing the work |
|
Too much 'magic of children,' too much reliance on heavy-handed musical scores, too few real reasons to care about many of the characters in many of his movies once the spell of the music and moving pictures has worn off. There are some that are fine entertainment, but not much more than that; there are some that could have been great but he couldn't resist making sure that the audience was 'feeling' enough (Schindler's List, for example). I think it's the combination of pomposity and superficiality that bothers me so much about the majority of his work.
|
Ron Green
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-07-10 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
|
His last good movie was "Jaws," and even then you could feel twinges of the emotional manipulation that would become his method.
|
MrCoffee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-08-10 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
44. "too much reliance on heavy-handed musical scores" |
Zomby Woof
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-07-10 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
31. I liked "Close Encounters" before he ruined it later |
|
...with a goddamned 'Special Edition'. You nailed it in another post below - he doesn't know when to leave well enough alone, or let the audience do the work. In the original CE3K, he left it a mystery on what Dreyfuss saw when he boarded the mother ship. That was part of the movie's charm - the sense of mystery and awe such an occurrence would bring to us. Not showing us what he saw allowed our imaginations to take over.
So 2 years later he decides to issue a 'Special Edition', and lure people back in the theaters just so we can see HIS vision of the mother ship. Which really wasn't all that spectacular or awe-inspiring as we were supposed to expect - hence another form of manipulation. I never trusted him after that, although I enjoyed the first installment of 'Raiders of the Lost Ark' - but the sequels only reinforced my distrust. And 'E.T.' cemented my loathing of him.
|
peekaloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-07-10 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
Rabrrrrrr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-07-10 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
36. That's the one! Not that he hasn't pulled off some genius stuff, but mostly emotionally manipulative |
|
pablum.
I rarely feel as cheated as I do after a Spielberg movie.
|
Deep13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-08-10 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
I wanted to like War of the Worlds and it would have been great without all the family drama, the scared kid shots and the images of people looking at things off screen. In short, it was like every other Spielberg movie I have seen since Close Encounters.
|
Archae
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 08:17 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Has he ever NOT fucked it up?
|
Manifestor_of_Light
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 08:25 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Tarantino and Kevin Smith. |
|
My kid made me watch: Pulp Fiction, Kill Bill, Dogma, and (I think) Reservoir Dogs.
Lots of crappy violence and shit I don't remember.
Dogma baffled me. The only part I got was George Carlin's bit as the priest introducing "Buddy Christ". That was funny.
I thought Clerks was really funny.
Titanic was good except for the shitty script. And the fact that Leo wasn't really old enough to be a leading man. And Billy Zane as a cardboard Snidely Whiplash.
|
progressoid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-08-10 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
|
Both are waaay over rated.
|
Richardo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 09:56 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The deft touch of a sledgehammer
|
DerekG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-06-10 10:44 PM
Response to Original message |
25. David Lynch, definitely |
|
Hey Lynch, remember Elephant Man, Blue Velvet and the Straight Story. Do that again! Stop masturbating and present me with a goddamn narrative!
|
Zomby Woof
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-07-10 01:47 AM
Response to Original message |
|
The Master of Cloyingly Sentimental Dreck. :puke:
|
OmahaBlueDog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-07-10 02:13 AM
Response to Original message |
|
After MP&THG, it was all downhill. I'll give him props for "The Fisher King", but "Jabberwocky" may be one of the worst films ever made, and "Brazil" and "Time Bandits" are vastly overrated.
|
MrCoffee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-08-10 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
48. 12 Monkeys was brilliant and no other director alive could have pulled off Fear and Loathing |
Patsy Stone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-07-10 08:40 AM
Response to Original message |
Initech
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-07-10 04:59 PM
Response to Original message |
Tommy_Carcetti
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-08-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Clerks was passable due to it being somewhat original and creative. The rest of his movies are just pretentious, annoying hipster-fanboy hybrid crap.
|
Deep13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-08-10 11:57 AM
Response to Original message |
Auggie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-08-10 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #43 |
45. I was going to say Guy Ritchie until you reminded me of DeMille. I concur. |
MrCoffee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-08-10 05:01 PM
Response to Original message |
|
How many times has Woody Allen made the same movie over and over and over again?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:22 AM
Response to Original message |