Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

And the Avatar-hating movie snobs start the pile-on.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 12:28 AM
Original message
And the Avatar-hating movie snobs start the pile-on.
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yep it is starting already....
Very predictable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't hate Avatar.
I just loathe James Cameron as a person. I actually feel rather sad about the movie. It's a shame that a non-Tolkien fantasy can't ever seem to win the Big Awards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withywindle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. That bugs me too, the fantasy thing.
At least this year they acknowledged horror as a red-headed stepchild.

Even when Return of the King won, I think everyone knew that all the awards were really for the entire trilogy, which was such a gigantic, impossibly huge achievement. So I guess fantasy CAN win once in a blue moon--as long as it busts its ass three times as hard as everything else.

I really didn't think Avatar was all that, though. I didn't hate it. Had a good message and sure was amazing to look at. But it really wasn't that well-written or well-acted, and certainly not very original storywise. Wanna see the theme done wwaayyyy better in a fantasy movie? Miyazaki's "Princess Mononoke." Yeah, it's anime, but so what? That's one I would have been happy to see sweep something in its time, even though it's got a double-whammy of genre prejudice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
87. great comments, as usual, withy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. and the Avatar-loving philistines are drowning their sorrows
in some domestic beverage I'm sure. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Hey, I resemble that remark!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. What?
Did it win best animated film?

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. No, it should have, but some stupid war movie won instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
58. Which you saw, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. Yeah, hard to understand some people.
They live for what they hate instead of what they love. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. not everyone who disliked Avatar is a snob
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
74. I'm certainly not a snob- I loved "Aliens" and "Total Recall"...
"Avatar" was just a big pile of pretentious, pandering CRAP attempting
to disguise itself as a "film" with 500 Million dollars
worth of CGI.

Unwatchable dreck.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
10. Yep
I don't mind being called a movie snob. I have a brain and good taste, and I am not going to be falsely modest about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TCJ70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
11. I enjoyed Avatar...just didn't think it was a best movie contender.
Technical achievements? You bet! Storyline wise? Not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Wow! Have you actually looked at a list of winners over the years?
Many haven't stood the test of time at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
20. +1
This is how I felt about it as well. Visually stunning, but pretty cliched otherwise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
12. Ah yes, anyone who thought the writing and acting was sub-par in Avatar is a snob.
I guess standards for movies really have fallen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Basic DU Rule
If you don't like something that's popular, you're a snob.
If you argue for quality, you're a snob.
If you can articulate the criteria by which you judge cultural expression, you're a snob.
If you judge cultural expression at all, you're a snob.
If you seek out different forms of cultural expression, and understand how they work, you're a snob.

Moreover, you'll be called a snob by people who read Joseph Campbell and basically think it explains everything.

Please keep up.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. If I could add...
If you judge what others enjoy based on your own opinion of what is enjoyable and what isn't (and you think you can justify it), you're a snob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. This is why any statement on quality is immediately labeled snobbish
Because people "enjoy" something, and if they "enjoy" something, and you make an argument about quality (i.e., an evaluative argument), it suddenly appears as an affront to the person who "enjoyed" it (through some fairly contorted logic, I might add).

This is one of the saddest states of affairs there is, and it has everything to do with the way advertising has asked us to identify personally with those things we buy (whether restaurant food or movie tickets). It leads to the complete collapse of the ability to evaluate in any but the most inscrutable personal terms ("Well, I liked it!").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueamy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #13
31. If you went to a private HS
Edited on Mon Mar-08-10 08:28 AM by blueamy66
you're a snob

I haven't seen Avatar or Hurt Locker...but plan to see them both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #31
45. Both?
Snob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #45
63. Nice post, snob.
And you play right into Campbell's snob archetype, first seen in The Epic of Gilgamesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #63
72. Campbell was a snob.
His hero archetype was derivative of Jung.
Oh, and Jung was a snob too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #72
88. huh? Assuming sarcasm here...
Do people really think Campbell stole his study of historical lore/ analyses from Jung?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #31
68. Speaking of high school...
If you liked the valedictorian over the most popular kid in school, then you're a slob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
15. While not as bad as the Grammies, the Oscars have a long track record of getting it wrong!
Edited on Mon Mar-08-10 01:24 AM by JCMach1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
16. I don't think I saw any of the other movies that were nominated, but I knew Avatar had to lose
That movie sucked on ice. After one hour I had a headache and was wondering when the hell it was going to be over. Little did I know it would be another 90 minutes :eyes:

Sorry for the pile on, but you're living on the edge with that OP ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. Even if Avatar does suck on ice, Cameron is laughing all the way to the bank.
He got your money, didn't he. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #22
47. Is that how we measure movie quality these days?
He didn't get my money. I saw it for free.

Thankfully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #47
54. Well, I thought District 9 sucked and I saw that for free also.
Thankfully.

The thing is, I get to measure movie quality for me and you get to do the same for yourself. Like food, there is undoubtedly some that we might hate but others may think it is the food of the gods.

People decide what movies are good by buying tickets to see them. If Avatar was so bad it would have sunk like a rock, but it stayed on top for weeks. Some movies that deserve Oscar wins do not get them and others that might not, do. Such is life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. Ah, but District 9 was far superior in the writing and acting departments.
If you can tell me with a straight face that Avatar had good writing, acting and multi-dimensional characters, I'll be impressed.

"The thing is, I get to measure movie quality for me and you get to do the same for yourself. Like food, there is undoubtedly some that we might hate but others may think it is the food of the gods."

Yes, which is why people calling others "snobs" because they didn't like the wooden acting and slipshod writing of Avatar is silly.

"People decide what movies are good by buying tickets to see them."

No, they decide what movies they are going to see. Buying a ticket for a movie doesn't mean you think it's good. I bought tickets to see the 2nd and 3rd Matrix movies, but I thought they were both terrible.

"If Avatar was so bad it would have sunk like a rock, but it stayed on top for weeks."

Yeah, by that measure The Phantom Menace was one of the best movies ever. :eyes:

"Some movies that deserve Oscar wins do not get them and others that might not, do. Such is life."

I'm glad Avatar didn't win Best Picture. It would be a depressing sign of how far movie standards have fallen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. There will never be a consensus as to which movie is better
because that is in the eye of the beholder. Like the Nobel Prizes, the Academy Awards are their prizes and they can give them to whoever their people decide should get them. There is no worldwide vote as to who most deserves the Oscars or what is the best movie. No film snobs get to decide which movies are best for everyone or to impose their views on everyone, and neither is there any select committee that gets to decide what the movie standards are for everyone either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. But there was a consensus at the Academy Awards that Avatar didn't deserve Best Picture,
Which I agree with.

If you can't tell that the writing, acting and character development in District 9 was far superior to that of Avatar, I feel bad for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tigereye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #57
89. interesting article in the NYT today talking about how many of the Acad voters
are now alternative film-makers and actors as opposed to old school studio types, hence the greater likelihood of smaller, artier films winning rather than giant, lumbering blockbusters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkTirade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #55
81. Of course the characters were multi-dimensional.
They were in 3d. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #81
83. LOL! Good one.
Ironic that for all the attention to 3d CGI, the people in the movie were only one dimension.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #16
44. After one hour I had a headache and was wondering when the hell it was going to be over
me too. it just dragged on and on and on. and the headache just got worse and worse and worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
huskerlaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
17. Very little acting and a shoddy screenplay.
Edited on Mon Mar-08-10 01:31 AM by huskerlaw
But yes, please do call me a snob for thinking that a movie that was 80% computer generated shouldn't have won. :eyes:

As others have said, technical achievements, yes. But overall best picture? Give me a break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
19. not a bad movie
but Hurt Locker is far superior
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
21. I thought District 9 was better than both
I loved that film, not nearly enough people saw it.

It's especially powerful when you realize that the majority of the first person "these 'cockroaches' are garbage, we don't want them" interviews are REAL interviews, but about immigrants from central africa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. I don't break for Reavers either (big Firefly & Serenity fan),
but I hated District 9 and would have walked out had friends not taken me to it for my birthday. Maybe because I go to fictional movies to be entertained and not to be hit repeatedly over the head with a "message".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. I liked District 9 the best also. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #21
35. District 9 was very good. And SHOCKING.
And there is something symbolic about the main character being an Afrikaaner ("Dutch" South African).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #35
56. well, everyone was
It's one of the first major South African films. I liked the "protagonist." You didn't really LIKE him (when he roasted all the eggs he showed himself to be less than a nice guy) but you were still fascinated by him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #21
39. I loved District 9 - I just bought it on Blue Ray this weekend
I thought it was the most original film made this year and the plot really fit with what is happening in RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrownPrinceBandar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #21
48. I agree with you Vault Dweller........
I liked "Avatar", but I thought that "D9" had a far better story, and the cultural context made the story that much more compelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #21
51. i'll buy that, hurt locker was great but district 9 was even better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
65. No shit?!?!?
I loved the movie, but I didn't know that. What an amazing and horrible piece of trivia!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #65
70. yeah
if you watch again, notice that they NEVER say "aliens" or anything like that, it's always "they" or something that's not obvious.

Of course that doesn't count the fake interviews with company employees, but rather the man-on-the-street stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. I could look this up, but it's more fun to talk about it...
Were those the actual interviews, or were the recreated with actors?


As I mentioned, I loved the film on first viewing, but now I need to watch it again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #71
73. i THINK
that I read that they were actual interviews, but I don't know if that's the case
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #73
75. Wow.
Before it hit the theaters, I heard an NPR story about it and its commentary on race, but I was totally unaware that the interviews were real.

That's a brilliant technique, by the way. It incorporates elements of a "mockumentary" while also telling an engaging story that seems very simple.


I'll need to read more about the production. Thanks for the info!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #75
76. no problem
I was totally blown away; i expected a pretty bland sci-fi movie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mreilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
24. I'm not a snob; I like trashy movies...
... but Avatar had nothing to offer, in my mind. Zero plot, zero characters, zero interest. I left the movie theater after 45 minutes convinced I'd been had by a CGI ripoff that purported to be the "best cinematic experience ever." Kind of like being told "Take a ride in this Ferrari, the fastest most luxurious car ever!" then finding out you're sitting in a kid's Radio Flyer wagon, bumps and squeaks and all.

It's silly to argue over opinion; some people loved Avatar and I loathed it. Dances with Wolves was far superior, more original, more realistic and honestly represented in my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #24
34. When I heard a synopsis of the plot, I was reminded of..
...Dances with Wolves.

Anyway, I know what you mean. Trashy movies have a right to be trashy. I liked Aliens because it was what it was. No pretense. When I rented Frankenhooker, I wasn't expecting Laurence of Arabia. It was a fun movie for what it was. On that note, it was nice to see Corman getting some acclaim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burma Jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
27. I liked Avatar just fine.......
back when it was called Dances With Wolves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shining Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Lol !
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
29. And why would Avatar fans even take notice, much less be intimidated?
How many millions more critics would it take to qualify as an actual "pile-on"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
30. I liked District 9
How the fuck could that make me a snob?

I can not help it if some people think pretty pictures can make up for a brain numbing stupid excuse of a story. Pretty pictures are for lulling babies to sleep.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
32. Yep, we're snobs....
Because we ask for good plots and characters.

Sorry about not being impressed by the shiny wrapping paper/special effects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
33. I'm reminded of Jane Fonda's line in California Suite.
When Alan Alda accuses her of being a snob she says, "Thank God there's a few of us left."

I might rent it, but probably I won't. The derivative story and the amount of money used to make it is a turn-off for me. Not a fan of James Cameron anyway except for his really early stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
36. Cameron is the one who gets to walk away laughing at the snobs
he has the highest grossing movie of all time and has changed the way the world views 3D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. Actually he has the TWO highest grossing movies of all time
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #36
49. People who like good acting and writing are "snobs"? Movie standards really have fallen.
The fact that you measure movie quality in box office performance is just plain sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #36
52. Nerddom, Thou Art Avenged!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #36
66. So Cameron's got all the money and the popularity...
wait, who's a snob?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
37. Haven't seen it. Really have no desire to.
I saw Precious and the Hurt Locker. Both were pretty good, but not as good as other past winners or nominees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
38. I should see Avatar again ...
'cause the first time I saw it, I left without those cool glasses.

Next time, they're mine!

:hi:

... "The future's so bright ..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RadiationTherapy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
41. I would just like to say UNOBTANIUM!
UNOBTANIUM!

UNOBTANIUM!

UNOBTANIUM!UNOBTANIUM!UNOBTANIUM!UNOBTANIUM!UNOBTANIUM!UNOBTANIUM!

This movie never had a chance; or a writer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #41
43. Cameron intentionally used a sci-fi cliche.
Probably for symbolic purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RadiationTherapy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #43
46. Well, I mispelled it for symbolic purposes.
The only symbolism for 'unobtainium' is that it was unobtainable; except they were digging it up.

Also, the 'If you believe in hell, you may want to go there for R n R' - ridiculous and unfounded even within the context of the movie.

It's fine; I hate pop music too. I am a grumpy ass who has high demands for art and entertainment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #46
77. To be fair, "unobtainium" is a generic term used by material scientists & engineers
Basically, whenever they need a material to do some specific thing and can't figure out how to make it, they call it "unobtainium."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #43
67. A sci-fi cliche? It was used once in "The Core" and it was mocked then too.
What wasn't "intentionally using a sci fi cliche."

He needed Gargamel to destroy the Smurf village so he invented a cheap plot device to explain why.

That's not symbolic. That's not clever.

It's a classic symptom of bad writing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #43
85. It's a pretty good movie with groundbreaking effects
the world of Pandora is just absolutely spectacular. The story itself is well done, but nothing extraordinary. As I had said before, the cartoon movie "Battle for Terra" came out 3-4 years ago and was almost the exact same story. Sure, Dances with Wolves and Ferngully had similarities, but BfT was really close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
42. I think it has more to do with Hollywood people not liking James Cameron
than them not liking Avatar.

I hear he is not well liked by many of the Hollywood elite and they feel like he had his day in the sun with Titanic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
50. what's the big deal? it's just a sci-fi movie...
Edited on Mon Mar-08-10 10:42 AM by dionysus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuddhaGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
53. Loved it Loved it Loved it!!!
I can't wait to see it again, in IMAX this time - probably will go this week :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
60. Actually, Favorite Human Being is an Avatar-hater
but not because she's a snob. She doesn't feel it presents a positive message about disability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. That Jake Sully was a paraplegic was one of the things I liked about the movie.
Especially the part early in the movie where he says that he's doing it to prove wrong people that said he couldn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. I think it's that he becomes "non-disabled" when in his "avatar" body.
Then again, a) FHB does have a tendency to fixate on these kinds of things; and b) I haven't seen it, so I don't really know what the hell I'm talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
64. It's not our fault you like shitty, stupid movies.
Acting sucked. Plot sucked. Writing sucked.

Hell, even the action and the special effects weren't very good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike 03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
69. It is sad that intelligent people can't understand that just because you don't LOVE something
you don't HATE it either.

What ever happend to nuance and "in-between."

I guess we are entering into moronville, where common sense just evaporates, and people don't understand what "opinions" are worth anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #69
79. Well, that's the problem with threads about the president....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #69
80. It's getting more and more difficult to tell the left from the right
There is no room for nuance any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
78. They're snobs. It's a good movie. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
82. If by "snob" you mean someone smart enough to make a valid artistic critique, then yes.
Call me a snob.

I prefer the term "actually knows what I'm talking about", but 'snob' is a much easier way for the mentally challenged to dismiss their superiors.

I loved Avatar. I enjoyed the hell out of it. But apart from oscars for technical stuff - which was brilliant - it was otherwise a ham-fisted script with a heavy-handed message lacking in nuance, subtlety, or passion, and certainly deserved no oscars for directing, script, acting, or best picture.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bikebloke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
84. I preferred District 9, too.
Also Bright Star, which would have been perfect with a car chase.


:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
86. I didn't like Return to Gilligan's Island, either...
I didn't like Return to Gilligan's Island either, but then again, being the snob that I am, I like a meaty script with enough character depth to allow an actor to really get their teeth into.

Of course, Return to Gilligan's Island played off some long-established literary archetypes, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #86
90. I agree.
Gilligan's Island without Tina Louise is like Sherwood without his Schwartz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #90
91. Or Mary without Ann...
Tina's absence was part of the problem. She was able to bring a gravitas to her character that contrasted quite nicely with The Skipper's antics. Sure, we could go round and round about the age old conundrum of whether the Professor had a Doctorate or a Master's, but that's hardly germain... :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC