Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bruce Davis, Academy mouthpiece, wraps ANOTHER insult around the Academy's Official Farrah Apology©

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 05:48 PM
Original message
Bruce Davis, Academy mouthpiece, wraps ANOTHER insult around the Academy's Official Farrah Apology©
You know, Michael Jackson, "The Wiz," blah blah blah, OK...he was the King of Pop and the King of Cinema. Gotcha.

But...

"Davis, who also says he stands by the decision about Fawcett's absence, had considered including her, but ultimately felt her "remarkable television work" would be more appropriately honored at the TV Academy's Emmys (which she was)."


...is BULLSHIT, because her performance in the FILM "The Apostle" was AMAZING. In the DVD commentary, Robert Duval defends the decision to cast her in the role because he knew she was right for it.

This little prick is like a Bush Administration toady...in the midst of public outrage, deliver a STFU "apology" wrapped around ANOTHER insult.

:rant:

The executive director of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has apologized to the friends, family and fans of Farrah Fawcett, who was conspicuously omitted from Sunday night's Oscar-event tribute to Hollywood personalities who had died over the past year.

While some agents and publicists, besides actors, were included in the memorial, Fawcett, a high-profile star better known for her TV work (who also appeared on the big screen), was not.

Neither was Gene Barry -- who was seen in both versions of "War of the Worlds" -- or Bea Arthur.

Among those criticizing the Academy for its selective omissions were critic Roger Ebert and Oscar-winner Jane Fonda.

In response, the Academy's Bruce Davis, who was responsible for the "in memoriam" segment (and has been since the tradition began in 1993), said late Tuesday: "There's nothing you can say to people, particularly to family members, within a day or two of the show that helps at all. They tend to be surprised and hurt, and we understand that and we're sorry for it."

Davis, who also says he stands by the decision about Fawcett's absence, had considered including her, but ultimately felt her "remarkable television work" would be more appropriately honored at the TV Academy's Emmys (which she was). He also noted that several notable screenwriters were not included in the tribute.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/Movies/03/10/farrah.fawcett.oscars.apology.ppl/index.html?hpt=C2


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Love Bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Turner Classic Movies does it right
The "In Memorium" segments they broadcast at the end of every year are done well and include all kinds of people involved in filmmaking: writers, producers, editors, actors, etc., etc. All Davis has to do is get ahold of a copy of that to make sure he doesn't overlook anyone. Idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't mean to seem insensitive, but I can only recall two film performances by her
Edited on Wed Mar-10-10 09:47 PM by Orrex
and one of them was Saturn III, for pity's sake! Does she have a significant history of work in film beyond these two movies?


However inelegantly they're handling the Oscar snub, it seems to me that she really was more of a tv icon than a film icon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC