begin_within
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-26-10 07:14 AM
Original message |
Wyman photoshopped out of Stones' album cover |
BurtWorm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-26-10 07:36 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Fri Mar-26-10 07:36 AM by BurtWorm
The Rolling Stalins.
|
edbermac
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-26-10 07:40 AM
Response to Original message |
2. At least the Stones didn't do a Brian Jones on him. |
|
http://static1.purepeople.com/articles/8/38/97/8/@/273566-brian-jones-avec-les-rolling-stones-en-637x0-3.jpg
|
raccoon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-26-10 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Thanks for the picture--I hadn't seen that one. nt |
Amerigo Vespucci
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-26-10 08:59 AM
Response to Original message |
4. It only adds insult to injury, because that "Rarities" album was junk. |
|
The majority of "rare" tracks were culled from readily-available Stones albums.
|
begin_within
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-26-10 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. And they probably included one or two tracks collectors wanted, |
|
to guarantee sales to the market of collectors and hard-core fans who have to have everything. In general my feeling about "rare tracks" is that they are rare for the reason that nobody wants much to listen to them anyway. Those "new" Beatles tracks a few years back (I think they were "Real Love" and "Free as a Bird")... are people clamoring to listen to them now?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:02 AM
Response to Original message |