Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There are too many states nowadays. Please eliminate three. P.S. I am not a crackpot

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 11:07 AM
Original message
There are too many states nowadays. Please eliminate three. P.S. I am not a crackpot
So which 3 states would you eliminate and why. And btw, you can't pick Delaware, nuff said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TK421 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. This one could get ugly quick...ain't touching it!
:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beer Snob-50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. this is easy
ct- because there are too many uconn women basketball fans out there

ny- the yankees nuff said

mo- because of branson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes but I could live with the Yankees - rather get rid of Arizona
nuff said

NY Yankees vs. Racist Policians - the Yankees always win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beer Snob-50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. boviously you don't live in new england!!! LOL
we can ignore racist assholes, but you cannot ignore yankee fans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. You can't just eliminate the state, you have to combine states to do it
try again :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. Connecticut: Bush country
Florida: America's Wang

North Dakota: It's completely fictitious anyway, so why keep up the pretense?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TK421 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. You might add something
Florida: America's Uncircumcised Wang
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. Texas, Hawaii, Alaska.
pick three, she said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. States with populations less than D.C. get consolidated. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 11:45 AM
Original message
Right now, I'm looking at AZ and Oklahoma.
They seem to want out anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. *double post*
Edited on Thu Apr-29-10 11:45 AM by Deep13
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. I would combine Wyoming, Idaho and Montana
Then the new state would have a population worth caring about :hide:

Next, we would have to Annex Louisiana as part of Texas. We can't have the new state of Wyidatana be larger than Texas :) Plus by adding Louisiana we can have more of a star shaped state :)


Oh, and Rhode Island goes to the highest bidder between Massachusetts and Connecticut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TK421 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Wydahona?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
42. Wydahellnot?-------nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
57. That certainly sounds nicer than "Wymountaho"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. heh
why ever not. indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. The States of Confusion, Panic, Despair.
They don't do much good for people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Why do you hate America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'd make all the Conferederate states unify into one, then get rid of it. Then Illinois and Utah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. But Obama is from Illinois
Would the birthers then finally have a claim that he can no longer be president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. A lot of the birthers would be eliminated in my Confederate States manuever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Yes but Oily Taintz would still be there
so you fail

:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quickesst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
51. I live in Arkansas.....
...as millions of dem/liberal/progressives do, and most of us love our homes. Although the minority, and living with a majority with different political agendas, we are making some progress. I believe that progress would increase if not for the continuing support, misguided as it may be, from stereotype addicts who do their part in hindering such progress. "Get rid of it"? How? Extermination, A-bombs, enslavement, deportation? Those are your alternatives, because without such heinous action by the "enlightened", we'll still be here. From the millions of us "down here", thanks for caring. You make us proud.
quickesst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #51
56. Go back and read the OP,
and save your poutrage for another time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
18. Combine the Dakotas, Virginias and Carolinas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
44. No fucking way. North Carolina has all the good stuff and we don't feel like sharing
North Carolina has the Outer Banks.
South Carolina has Myrtle Beach.

North Carolina has Chapel Hill.
SC has Colombia.

North Carolina has Doc Watson.
SC has Hootie and the Blowfish.

I could go on and on and on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #44
54. North Carolina has Research Triangle Park. South Carolina has...
entirely too many fundies that want to attract more and turn itself into a religious state.


Break SC off and let it float out to sea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #54
73. Duke vs. South of the Border
Sounds like you both suck! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TK421 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #54
75. "Break SC off and let it float out to sea."
for the whole Hootie and the Blowfish thing alone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #44
69. South Carolina has Mark Sanford
nuff said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #18
63. Then split the Californias
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #63
71. We could have five Californias.
With Capitals of Los Angeles, San Francisco, Eureka, Barstow, and Bakersfield.

The Imperial Valley and Central Valley would be a single state connected by a corridor of rangelands following the San Andreas and her sister faults.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
19. First three to secede. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
21. Delaware should become part of Maryland, since Delaware seems hell-bent
on replacing Biden's senate seat with a repuke!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Ted Kauffman needs to run
Edited on Thu Apr-29-10 01:09 PM by LynneSin
We love Ted!

:loveya:

Hey at least we didn't have a numnuts like Michael Steele as our Lt. Governor!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Steele has actually never won a real election on his own.
I don't know who is worse: Steele or Alan Keyes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
22. Tamaulipas, Veracruz, Nuevo Leon.
Make them part of Texas. It would beautify Texas by giving us more beaches and more Democratic voters.

California can have the two Baja states. They need some voting help too these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chemenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
24. Just three???
Damn you making it hard!

Connecticut - Joe Lieberman
Alaska - Sarah Failin' (this one is a given ... so it doesn't count)
Arizona - John (I am not a Maverick so ... Nyah!) McCain ... and ... Show me your papers!
Minnesota - Michelle Bachmann (any state that would have her as its Congressional Representative needs to be cast adrift).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Wait you would get rid of Minnesota - what about Al Franken
:cry:

Why do you make baby jesus cry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #24
37. Minnesota?
You're crazy, you'd be getting rid of Al Franken and Keith Ellison. Just get rid of MB, the state should stay. Her district is a gerrymanderers wet dream. Get rid of her district.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #24
80. If Sarah still lives here, we haven't seen her in months...
not that anyone cares. We're doing just fine without her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
26. If Delaware is no longer a state, does it become Delawore? nt
Edited on Thu Apr-29-10 01:21 PM by jobycom
Edited for TWT--Typing While Tired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 03:33 PM
Original message
It becomes Delawas. Or Delawere. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
28. Hawaii, Alaska, and Florida
Hawaii and Alaska because I want a continental United States and Florida because it just hangs off the nation like some limp, useless penis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #28
81. I agree with you on Alaska.
Edited on Sat May-01-10 01:16 PM by Blue_In_AK
We should be part of Canada. I think Alaskans are much more like Yukon Territorians than they are, say, East Coasters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
29. Texas, Arizona, and Alaska
Do I need to explain?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosie1223 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
30. First, I'd combine Mississippi, Alabama, & Georgia
They're pretty much the same anyway.

Then I'd expand Illinois to cover Wisconsin. I'm really sick of their "FIB" belly-aching. Without Illinois tourist dollars, Wisconsin Dells would dry up and Wisconsin would convert to it's original breeding ground of methane and mosquitoes. It would be better off, I'm sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. .
Edited on Thu Apr-29-10 03:40 PM by racaulk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosie1223 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Just kidding, like everyone else on this thread.
Wisconsin is a fine state, too.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Whoa...sorry!
I really misread the intent of your post. I guess I'm a little too sensitive to the anti-Southern attitudes that, IMHO, appear a little too often around here. I forgot that I was in the Lounge for a moment! :blush:

My apologies for the snark -- you didn't deserve that. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosie1223 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. No Problem!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
31. Geezus fucking christ
You know I have yet to find something I don't like about any state I've visited . Even the much maligned Arizona has a lot- natural beauty fascinating wildlife and even you know that pesky MAYO CLINIC that *gasp* saves lives. But we don't like their politics so let's shit all over them! I remember a freeper type friend joking about getting rid of ALL of New England because of the "useless liberals". Wasn't funny when he said it and it's not funny now Lynne. Is there a point to this flamebait bullshit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
32. I don't think we have enough states.
NYC deserves its own state, as does DC and PR. Texas should be split up into 3-4 states. Same with CA. UP MI should be spun off on its own too.

There should also be some way for Native Americans to have direct representation in Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
33. 1 Dakota. WVA joins VA. RI joins CT. nt
Dakotas. There are not enough people to warrant two states. We could call it "The Dakota Territory" again.
West VA doesn't have a diverse enough economy.
RI is horribly corrupt and incompetent. Give it to Tidy Connecticut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
35. I am still fairly certain that Kansas does not and never has existed.
Bad case of consensus reality, I say. No one can offer me convincing proof that it does.

And if we got rid of texas and florida, where would all the news come from? MMmm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #35
70. I'm guessing you haven't watched "The Wizard of Oz"
Proof that Kansas is real!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #70
74. WHAT? It's a documentary?
I can't find it on the net but I was told of a newspaper description of the Wizard of Oz when it aired once: "A young girl goes to a strange new place, kills the first person she meets, hooks up with three strangers and goes on to kill again."

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
39. Combine the Dakotas
Combine Utah, Wyoming, Idaho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
40. Get rid of all states starting with "I"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftinOH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
43. North Dakota & South Dakota should be joined together -seriously;
the total population would still be quite small. Currently, FOUR US Senators represent about 1.7 million people. In addition, Wyoming could join Colorado.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carlyhippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #43
52. HA! maybe with both Dakotas combined they may actually hit 1 million people
in the summer months anyway, it will only be about half that in the winter after the snow birds drive south to Texas, Arizona and NM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
45. Texas, Alaska, and Alabama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
46. How about if we just simplify the names?
Edited on Thu Apr-29-10 04:35 PM by brooklynite
For example, Minnesota could become "East Dakota" and Montana could become "West Dakota"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
47. No. This is stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommy_Carcetti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
48. As someone who's heard his fair share of "Floriduh" jokes, I'll pass on this one.
Every state has something worthwhile about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
miscsoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
49. I'll be deep in the cold, cold ground before I recognize Missourah
also, uh, south carolina and alaska, i don't like the shape of alaska, it is the ugliest state
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Throd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
50. California should be broken into three pieces
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #50
67. Please elaborate
I have considered this. I do not see it improving the country any. What am I missing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Throd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #67
72. It isn't about improving the country.
I have lived for 20 years in Southern California and 12 years in Northern California. What is important to people in Arcata is often irrelevant in San Diego and vice versa. I think the citizens would be better served.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
53. Confusion. War. Fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brother Buzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
55. Think how spastic a 47 star flag would look
Let's just eliminate two and go back to the beautiful 48 star flag I remember from my childhood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #55
61. Here's a 47 star flag


New Mexico & Arizona were admitted into the union about a month apart, becoming states #47 & #48. The official turnover date for new stars on the flag is July 4th, so there never was a 47 star flag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brother Buzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. That cool but still spastic
I heard there was an unofficial forty-seven star flag, just like there was an unofficial forty-nine star flag, but I never saw one. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
58. North Dakota, Texas, and the one I can't pick. We can keep Rhode Island. It's cute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
59. The south, the west, and Alaska.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-29-10 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
64. Texas. Texas. And Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apex3350 Donating Member (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
65. texass, wyoming, and utah
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
66. Negatory. I would add 3. Perhaps more
DC for one. Guam and the Northern Marianis combined for another. Puerto rico and US virgin Islands for the third. And add any of our other local territories to whatever they are closest too.

6 more senators from. A handful of reps. And the rights and responsibilities that go with state hood, no more free ride for territories. No more "made in USA" under fully libertarian regulations, no more republican forced sex retreat islands on US soil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikeytherat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
68. "Whenever I view your magazine, I don't see one wrinkled face or a single toothless grin. For shame!
To the sickos at Modern Bride magazine."

mikey_the_rat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Troop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
76. Well, of course NY would have to go....
they might be able to squeak by if they put the Yankees in prison. The other ones? The tiny States - RI, DE and, uh, CT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
77. I would eliminate and combine...
I would temporarily eliminate Texas even though I live there just to show all these dumb ass secession people how great federal dollars are. But let them back once my point was made. I would combine Arizona and New Mexico, North and South Dakota, Tennessee and Kentucky and all of the New England states into one, and call it New Delaware. Give Alaska to Canada, then make Puerto Rico a state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #77
83. Another vote for giving Alaska to Canada!
I really like this idea. I'm really not too fond of the United States, although I like some of you people down there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
78. Those tiny northeastern ones have no business being separate states.
Combine Vermont and New Hampshire.
Connecticut, Rhode Island and Massachusetts must become one state that people can spell.
Delaware must combine with either New Jersey or Delaware. They can vote on it. We need to make room for a new state like DC, Puerto Rico or Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #78
85. We could give ME back to MA, but that wouldn't help with the spelling issue.
Maine is one of the NE states that was not one of the 13 colonies. NH is the other, and VT is easier to spell, so if we return NH to VT, it kind of cancels out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
79. I wouldn't mind if Alaska left
as long as we could be part of Canada, which makes infinitely more sense than being part of the US of A anyway.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoGOPZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
82. Last in, first out. Hawaii, Alaska and Arizona
Of course, it's simply an easy way of getting rid of Palin and the Arizona legislature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #82
84. Palin is the Lower 48's problem now.
We're so over her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
86. A 47-star flag would look like crap.
You really might want to rethink this. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC