Tony_FLADEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-10 09:47 PM
Original message |
I figured out why O'Reilly defended Obama's response to the oil spill |
|
The reason is because Obama and his administration have not been tough on BP and the oil industry. For example, Obama has not advocated raising the limit amount they are responsible for. The instant Obama starts asking them to pay more O'Reilly will start attacking him.
|
The Velveteen Ocelot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-10 09:50 PM
Response to Original message |
1. This isn't a proper lounge thread |
|
since it does not involve cats, rock 'n' roll or flatulence.
|
Kali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-10 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
flying rabbit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu May-06-10 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
The noise escaping O'Reilly's mouth IS flatulence.
|
applegrove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-07-10 10:05 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Oreilly would likely have some oil stock. That is probably what is behind it too. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:49 PM
Response to Original message |